Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification
Antonio Escolar Conesa, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Vanessa Roldán, Eva Soler Espejo, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Pablo Gil Pérez, Eduardo González Lozano, José María Arribas Leal, Sergio Cánovas López, Daniel Saura Espín, María José Oliva Sandoval, Eduardo Pinar Bermúdez, Juan García De Lara, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Francisco Marín
{"title":"Evaluation of the Presence of Native Valvular Disease in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using the EHRA (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic, or Artificial) Classification","authors":"Antonio Escolar Conesa, María Asunción Esteve-Pastor, Vanessa Roldán, Eva Soler Espejo, José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca, Pablo Gil Pérez, Eduardo González Lozano, José María Arribas Leal, Sergio Cánovas López, Daniel Saura Espín, María José Oliva Sandoval, Eduardo Pinar Bermúdez, Juan García De Lara, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Francisco Marín","doi":"10.1002/clc.70172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Atrial fibrillation (AF) in association with native valvular heart disease (VHD) is very common and both entities perpetuate each other due to volume and pressure overload. In 2017, the new EHRA classification (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial) was proposed: EHRA 1 (mechanical prostheses or moderate/severe mitral stenosis), EHRA 2 (native valvular involvement or biological prosthesis) and EHRA 3 (without valve disease). The objective was to analyze the clinical characteristics as well as adverse events in the follow-up of AF patients under oral anticoagulation classified according EHRA classification.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multicenter retrospective observational descriptive study was designed and collected clinical, analytical, echocardiographic characteristics as well as adverse events in the follow-up of patients with AF who start oral anticoagulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>1.399 patients were included (mean age 75.3 ± 9.9 years; 659 (47.1%) male), of whom, 63% were classified as EHRA 2. After a median follow-up of 910 (IQR 730−1018) days, native EHRA 2 patients had higher event rates/patient-year as well as a higher total rate of adverse events such as cardiovascular mortality (5.5% vs. 1.1% event/patient-year; 8.7% vs. 1.1% <i>p</i> < 0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (8.9% vs. 3.4% event/patient-year; 14.2% vs. 3.1% <i>p</i> < 0.001), compared with EHRA 3 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that native EHRA 2 group was independently associated with all major adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In anticoagulated AF patients, those with native valve involvement (EHRA 2) have a worse prognosis than patients without valve involvement (EHRA 3). The presence of native valvular disease is shown as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, ACS, heart failure, and MACE.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/clc.70172","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in association with native valvular heart disease (VHD) is very common and both entities perpetuate each other due to volume and pressure overload. In 2017, the new EHRA classification (Evaluated Heartvalves, Rheumatic or Artificial) was proposed: EHRA 1 (mechanical prostheses or moderate/severe mitral stenosis), EHRA 2 (native valvular involvement or biological prosthesis) and EHRA 3 (without valve disease). The objective was to analyze the clinical characteristics as well as adverse events in the follow-up of AF patients under oral anticoagulation classified according EHRA classification.
Methods
A multicenter retrospective observational descriptive study was designed and collected clinical, analytical, echocardiographic characteristics as well as adverse events in the follow-up of patients with AF who start oral anticoagulation.
Results
1.399 patients were included (mean age 75.3 ± 9.9 years; 659 (47.1%) male), of whom, 63% were classified as EHRA 2. After a median follow-up of 910 (IQR 730−1018) days, native EHRA 2 patients had higher event rates/patient-year as well as a higher total rate of adverse events such as cardiovascular mortality (5.5% vs. 1.1% event/patient-year; 8.7% vs. 1.1% p < 0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (8.9% vs. 3.4% event/patient-year; 14.2% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), compared with EHRA 3 patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that native EHRA 2 group was independently associated with all major adverse events.
Conclusion
In anticoagulated AF patients, those with native valve involvement (EHRA 2) have a worse prognosis than patients without valve involvement (EHRA 3). The presence of native valvular disease is shown as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality, major bleeding, cardiovascular mortality, ACS, heart failure, and MACE.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.