Iulian Antoniac , Veronica Manescu (Paltanea) , Gheorghe Paltanea , Aurora Antoniac , Marco Fosca , Dan Laptoiu , Julietta V. Rau
{"title":"Advancements in biomaterials and bioactive solutions for lumbar spine fusion cages: Current trends and future perspectives","authors":"Iulian Antoniac , Veronica Manescu (Paltanea) , Gheorghe Paltanea , Aurora Antoniac , Marco Fosca , Dan Laptoiu , Julietta V. Rau","doi":"10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.07.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Spinal fusion is considered today as the last treatment option for different spinal conditions, such as degenerative and infectious illnesses. It consists of fusing two or more vertebrae to obtain reinforcement/fixation based on several methods used to sustain osteosynthesis and grafting, such as cage insertion in the intervertebral space, which provides an important level of mechanical stability, impacting only a low amount of the natural biomechanics of the spine and facilitating the implant bony ingrowth. This review paper first explores the background of intervertebral fusion, emphasizing medical applications and material properties of interbody fusion cages. It then provides a brief historical overview and discusses antibacterial efficacy-related issues. Additionally, some of the most met-in-clinical practice lumbar interbody cages with a detailed description of their geometry and examples of clinical trials performed worldwide are provided. The biomaterials used in lumbar cage manufacture are comprehensively described. In the last part of this review paper, special attention is devoted to prospective biomaterials and coatings for spine fusion cages. Firstly, the rationale for using Mg-based alloys or high osteogenic polycaprolactone as biodegradable and bioresorbable alternatives in the spinal cage industry, addressing the clinical limitations of traditional Ti alloys and polyether ether ketone, is provided. Then, a more conservative approach, focusing on the use of bioactive or antibacterial coatings on the already certified biomaterials, is presented as a second alternative to the existing products on the market. Relevant literature studies are reviewed, and the osteointegrative, bioactive, or antibacterial character of the coatings is explained. Finally, our review identifies current clinical limitations and offers future perspectives that will provide better bioactive solutions, improving the existing biomaterials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8762,"journal":{"name":"Bioactive Materials","volume":"53 ","pages":"Pages 656-703"},"PeriodicalIF":18.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioactive Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X25003287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spinal fusion is considered today as the last treatment option for different spinal conditions, such as degenerative and infectious illnesses. It consists of fusing two or more vertebrae to obtain reinforcement/fixation based on several methods used to sustain osteosynthesis and grafting, such as cage insertion in the intervertebral space, which provides an important level of mechanical stability, impacting only a low amount of the natural biomechanics of the spine and facilitating the implant bony ingrowth. This review paper first explores the background of intervertebral fusion, emphasizing medical applications and material properties of interbody fusion cages. It then provides a brief historical overview and discusses antibacterial efficacy-related issues. Additionally, some of the most met-in-clinical practice lumbar interbody cages with a detailed description of their geometry and examples of clinical trials performed worldwide are provided. The biomaterials used in lumbar cage manufacture are comprehensively described. In the last part of this review paper, special attention is devoted to prospective biomaterials and coatings for spine fusion cages. Firstly, the rationale for using Mg-based alloys or high osteogenic polycaprolactone as biodegradable and bioresorbable alternatives in the spinal cage industry, addressing the clinical limitations of traditional Ti alloys and polyether ether ketone, is provided. Then, a more conservative approach, focusing on the use of bioactive or antibacterial coatings on the already certified biomaterials, is presented as a second alternative to the existing products on the market. Relevant literature studies are reviewed, and the osteointegrative, bioactive, or antibacterial character of the coatings is explained. Finally, our review identifies current clinical limitations and offers future perspectives that will provide better bioactive solutions, improving the existing biomaterials.
Bioactive MaterialsBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
28.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
436
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍:
Bioactive Materials is a peer-reviewed research publication that focuses on advancements in bioactive materials. The journal accepts research papers, reviews, and rapid communications in the field of next-generation biomaterials that interact with cells, tissues, and organs in various living organisms.
The primary goal of Bioactive Materials is to promote the science and engineering of biomaterials that exhibit adaptiveness to the biological environment. These materials are specifically designed to stimulate or direct appropriate cell and tissue responses or regulate interactions with microorganisms.
The journal covers a wide range of bioactive materials, including those that are engineered or designed in terms of their physical form (e.g. particulate, fiber), topology (e.g. porosity, surface roughness), or dimensions (ranging from macro to nano-scales). Contributions are sought from the following categories of bioactive materials:
Bioactive metals and alloys
Bioactive inorganics: ceramics, glasses, and carbon-based materials
Bioactive polymers and gels
Bioactive materials derived from natural sources
Bioactive composites
These materials find applications in human and veterinary medicine, such as implants, tissue engineering scaffolds, cell/drug/gene carriers, as well as imaging and sensing devices.