Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) profiles of carabid beetle communities exposed to acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos or λ-cyhalothrin

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Agnieszka J. Bednarska , Grzegorz Sowa , Danuta Frydryszak , Renata Śliwińska-Grochot , Ryszard Laskowski
{"title":"Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) profiles of carabid beetle communities exposed to acetamiprid, chlorpyrifos or λ-cyhalothrin","authors":"Agnieszka J. Bednarska ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Sowa ,&nbsp;Danuta Frydryszak ,&nbsp;Renata Śliwińska-Grochot ,&nbsp;Ryszard Laskowski","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many carabid species are essential for pest management in agricultural areas, but at the same time can be exposed to pesticides. To understand how pesticides may affect ecosystem services provided by carabids, it is crucial to assess the effects of exposure not only for individual species but for whole communities. The objective of our study was thus to assess the distribution of sensitivity in carabid communities inhabiting agricultural landscapes toward three insecticides representing three major groups: neonicotinoid acetamiprid, organophosphate chlorpyrifos, and pyrethroid λ-cyhalothrin. Using a vial test, in which an active ingredient dissolved in acetone is evenly distributed inside a glass vial, we first assessed the median lethal doses (24-h LD<sub>50</sub>) for each insecticide to 10–20 species collected in agricultural areas, which were further used to establish Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) profiles. Each insecticide tested caused a serious threat to beetle communities at the recommended field doses, with the strongest effect caused by chlorpyrifos and the weakest by acetamiprid. The estimated Potentially Affected Fraction (PAF) of species at doses of the insecticides recommended for field use was 100 % for chlorpyrifos, 99.8 % for λ-cyhalothrin, and ca. 66 % for acetamiprid. The Hazardous Doses for 5 % species (HD5) were 0.034, 0.47, and 3.79 % of their recommended field doses, respectively. Our findings prove that carabids are a group of ecosystem service providers at considerable risk from insecticide exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"996 ","pages":"Article 180154"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725017942","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many carabid species are essential for pest management in agricultural areas, but at the same time can be exposed to pesticides. To understand how pesticides may affect ecosystem services provided by carabids, it is crucial to assess the effects of exposure not only for individual species but for whole communities. The objective of our study was thus to assess the distribution of sensitivity in carabid communities inhabiting agricultural landscapes toward three insecticides representing three major groups: neonicotinoid acetamiprid, organophosphate chlorpyrifos, and pyrethroid λ-cyhalothrin. Using a vial test, in which an active ingredient dissolved in acetone is evenly distributed inside a glass vial, we first assessed the median lethal doses (24-h LD50) for each insecticide to 10–20 species collected in agricultural areas, which were further used to establish Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) profiles. Each insecticide tested caused a serious threat to beetle communities at the recommended field doses, with the strongest effect caused by chlorpyrifos and the weakest by acetamiprid. The estimated Potentially Affected Fraction (PAF) of species at doses of the insecticides recommended for field use was 100 % for chlorpyrifos, 99.8 % for λ-cyhalothrin, and ca. 66 % for acetamiprid. The Hazardous Doses for 5 % species (HD5) were 0.034, 0.47, and 3.79 % of their recommended field doses, respectively. Our findings prove that carabids are a group of ecosystem service providers at considerable risk from insecticide exposure.

Abstract Image

吡虫脒、毒死蜱和λ-氯氟氰菊酯对瓢虫群落的敏感性分布特征
许多瓢虫种类对农业地区的病虫害管理至关重要,但同时也可能暴露于杀虫剂。要了解农药如何影响瓢虫提供的生态系统服务,不仅要评估对单个物种的影响,还要评估对整个群落的影响。因此,本研究的目的是评估居住在农业景观中的瓢虫群落对三大类杀虫剂的敏感性分布:新烟碱类杀虫剂、有机磷毒死蜱和拟除虫菊酯λ-氯氟氰菊酯。采用小瓶法,将有效成分溶解于丙酮中均匀分布于玻璃小瓶中,首先评估了每种杀虫剂对农业地区采集的10-20个物种的中位致死剂量(24小时LD50),并利用该方法建立了物种敏感性分布(SSD)曲线。在推荐的田间剂量下,所测试的每种杀虫剂都对甲虫群落造成严重威胁,毒死蜱造成的影响最强,对乙酰咪啶造成的影响最弱。在田间推荐使用的杀虫剂剂量下,估计的物种潜在影响分数(PAF)为毒死蜱100%,λ-氯氟氰菊酯99.8%,啶虫脒约66%。5%种(HD5)的危险剂量分别为野外推荐剂量的0.034%、0.47%和3.79%。我们的研究结果证明,瓢虫是一组生态系统服务提供者,面临杀虫剂暴露的相当大的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信