A systematic literature review furthering the participatory futures and governance debate to capacities

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Sai Varsha Akavarapu
{"title":"A systematic literature review furthering the participatory futures and governance debate to capacities","authors":"Sai Varsha Akavarapu","doi":"10.1016/j.futures.2025.103670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, participatory futures practices have become integral to urban futures studies. While the design, method, and approach of participatory futures processes have been gaining traction, there is a growing recognition that the success of such initiatives hinges on the capacities of local organizations and actors responsible for designing, driving, and governing these discourses. Positioned at the intersection of capacities, participation, and futures governance, this study explores three key questions: How are the capacities required to guide participatory futures conceptualized in the urban context? and what are they? How are the capacities intertwined with the governance of participatory futures? and moreover, whose capacities exert the most significant influence in shaping participatory futures practices? Through a systematic literature review of 43 studies, this research identified four distinct perspectives that further the participatory futures and governance debate to capacities: (1) <em><strong>the institutionalist perspective</strong></em> emphasizes the prescriptive role of structures in facilitating participatory futuring; (2) <em><strong>the organizational perspective</strong></em> highlights the role of system dynamics and participatory cultures within organizations as determinants of effective participatory futuring; (3) <em><strong>the transformative perspective</strong></em> centers on individual actors actions, specifically on their capacity to break away from unsustainable practices in shaping transformative participatory futures; (4) <em><strong>the participatory futures practice-oriented</strong></em> perspective focuses on methods, vision, duration and citizen input integration in participatory futures processes, emphasizing upon reflexivity in methodological aspects of these exercises. Findings reveal that while existing research increasingly prioritizes innovation in participatory methods and approaches, a critical gap remains in examining the capacities that enable immersive and transformative participatory futures processes. A capacity-driven approach to participatory futures practices focused on deliberative citizen empowerment is the need of the hour to advance the co-production of sustainable futures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48239,"journal":{"name":"Futures","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 103670"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Futures","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328725001326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past two decades, participatory futures practices have become integral to urban futures studies. While the design, method, and approach of participatory futures processes have been gaining traction, there is a growing recognition that the success of such initiatives hinges on the capacities of local organizations and actors responsible for designing, driving, and governing these discourses. Positioned at the intersection of capacities, participation, and futures governance, this study explores three key questions: How are the capacities required to guide participatory futures conceptualized in the urban context? and what are they? How are the capacities intertwined with the governance of participatory futures? and moreover, whose capacities exert the most significant influence in shaping participatory futures practices? Through a systematic literature review of 43 studies, this research identified four distinct perspectives that further the participatory futures and governance debate to capacities: (1) the institutionalist perspective emphasizes the prescriptive role of structures in facilitating participatory futuring; (2) the organizational perspective highlights the role of system dynamics and participatory cultures within organizations as determinants of effective participatory futuring; (3) the transformative perspective centers on individual actors actions, specifically on their capacity to break away from unsustainable practices in shaping transformative participatory futures; (4) the participatory futures practice-oriented perspective focuses on methods, vision, duration and citizen input integration in participatory futures processes, emphasizing upon reflexivity in methodological aspects of these exercises. Findings reveal that while existing research increasingly prioritizes innovation in participatory methods and approaches, a critical gap remains in examining the capacities that enable immersive and transformative participatory futures processes. A capacity-driven approach to participatory futures practices focused on deliberative citizen empowerment is the need of the hour to advance the co-production of sustainable futures.
一项系统的文献综述,将参与性未来和治理辩论推向能力
在过去的二十年中,参与式期货实践已经成为城市期货研究不可或缺的一部分。虽然参与式未来进程的设计、方法和途径已经获得了牵引力,但人们越来越认识到,这些倡议的成功取决于负责设计、推动和管理这些话语的地方组织和行动者的能力。本研究定位于能力、参与和未来治理的交叉点,探讨了三个关键问题:如何在城市背景下指导参与式未来的概念?它们是什么呢?这些能力是如何与参与性未来的治理交织在一起的?此外,谁的能力在塑造参与式未来实践方面发挥着最重要的影响?通过对43项研究的系统文献回顾,本研究确定了四种不同的观点,将参与性未来和治理辩论进一步推进到能力:(1)制度主义观点强调结构在促进参与性未来中的规范性作用;(2)组织视角强调了组织内系统动力学和参与性文化作为有效参与性未来决定因素的作用;(3)变革视角关注个体行动者的行动,特别是他们在塑造变革参与性未来方面摆脱不可持续做法的能力;(4)参与式期货实践导向视角关注参与式期货过程的方法、愿景、持续时间和公民输入整合,强调这些实践在方法方面的反身性。调查结果显示,虽然现有研究越来越重视参与性方法和方法的创新,但在审查实现沉浸式和变革性参与性未来进程的能力方面仍然存在重大差距。以能力为导向的参与性未来实践侧重于公民协商赋权,是推动共同生产可持续未来的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Futures
Futures Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Futures is an international, refereed, multidisciplinary journal concerned with medium and long-term futures of cultures and societies, science and technology, economics and politics, environment and the planet and individuals and humanity. Covering methods and practices of futures studies, the journal seeks to examine possible and alternative futures of all human endeavours. Futures seeks to promote divergent and pluralistic visions, ideas and opinions about the future. The editors do not necessarily agree with the views expressed in the pages of Futures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信