{"title":"The limits of energy conservation: Why doubling current energy efficiency progress is no easy feat","authors":"Fateh Belaïd","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy efficiency is central to achieving global decarbonization objectives. The COP28 agreement calls for doubling the average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from 2 % to 4 % annually by 2030. To explore the feasibility of this target, we first apply a Kaya-identity decomposition—at both global and regional levels—to separate activity, structural, and intensity effects, distinguishing conversion from final-energy efficiency at the point of use. The regional breakdown exposes marked heterogeneity across industrialized, emerging, and least-developed economies. We then used a complementary forecasting framework—autoregressive integrated moving-average, exponential smoothing, and prophet models—that provides complementary outlooks. While historical gains have moderated energy demand, sustained improvements beyond 2 % per year have been rare and typically driven by economic contractions rather than structural shifts. Our baseline projections reach only 1.9 % per year under current policies, leaving a persistent annual shortfall of 2–3 percentage points and a cumulative gap of ≈19 % by 2030. We interpret these findings through the multi-level perspective: (i) at the landscape level, international commitments outpace many national capabilities; (ii) at the regime level, established rules, limited finance, and “low-hanging-fruit” depletion slow further progress; and (iii) at the niche level, innovations such as widespread electrification, smart demand response, and low-cost retrofits can accelerate savings but remain unevenly accessible. Meeting the 4 % target will require binding performance standards, sizable financial incentives, accelerated technology diffusion, and explicit safeguards for affordability and equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104253"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Energy efficiency is central to achieving global decarbonization objectives. The COP28 agreement calls for doubling the average annual rate of energy efficiency improvements from 2 % to 4 % annually by 2030. To explore the feasibility of this target, we first apply a Kaya-identity decomposition—at both global and regional levels—to separate activity, structural, and intensity effects, distinguishing conversion from final-energy efficiency at the point of use. The regional breakdown exposes marked heterogeneity across industrialized, emerging, and least-developed economies. We then used a complementary forecasting framework—autoregressive integrated moving-average, exponential smoothing, and prophet models—that provides complementary outlooks. While historical gains have moderated energy demand, sustained improvements beyond 2 % per year have been rare and typically driven by economic contractions rather than structural shifts. Our baseline projections reach only 1.9 % per year under current policies, leaving a persistent annual shortfall of 2–3 percentage points and a cumulative gap of ≈19 % by 2030. We interpret these findings through the multi-level perspective: (i) at the landscape level, international commitments outpace many national capabilities; (ii) at the regime level, established rules, limited finance, and “low-hanging-fruit” depletion slow further progress; and (iii) at the niche level, innovations such as widespread electrification, smart demand response, and low-cost retrofits can accelerate savings but remain unevenly accessible. Meeting the 4 % target will require binding performance standards, sizable financial incentives, accelerated technology diffusion, and explicit safeguards for affordability and equity.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.