Intersection crash analysis considering longitudinal and lateral risky driving behavior from connected vehicle data: A spatial machine learning approach

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Lei Han, Mohamed Abdel-Aty
{"title":"Intersection crash analysis considering longitudinal and lateral risky driving behavior from connected vehicle data: A spatial machine learning approach","authors":"Lei Han,&nbsp;Mohamed Abdel-Aty","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing intersection safety analysis studies have primarily focused on macro-level static infrastructure and highly aggregated traffic features. The emergence of Connected Vehicle (CV) has enabled researchers to extract micro-level driving behavior attributes from CVs. Although longitudinal driving behaviors (e.g., hard braking) have been studied recently, critical lateral left and right turn behaviors, which are common and pose potential conflict risk at intersections, have been largely overlooked. Meanwhile, dealing with both spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear effects between crash frequency and multitudinous driving features is another critical challenge for intersection safety analysis. To address such gaps, this study extracted driving behavior features for both longitudinal movements and lateral left and right turns to comprehensively capture driving dynamics at intersections. A novel spatial ML framework was proposed to integrate nonlinear ML models (e.g., LightGBM) with geographically weighted regression: Besides a global ML model training on all samples to fit average estimations, distinct local ML models are trained for each spatial sample with its neighbors to capture localized spatial heterogeneity. Empirical experiments using CV data at a Florida county show that the inclusion of lateral turning behavior (e.g., hard left/right turns) leads to improved accuracy of intersection crash frequency prediction. Compared to traditional Rrandom Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Multilayer Perceptron models, the spatial ML integrating LightGBM demonstrates significant improvements of 5.8%, 6.3%, and 5.6% in RMSE, MAE, and R<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The results reveal the nonlinear impact of driving features and their spatial heterogeneity: In downtown, hard braking events primarily influence the risk of rear-end (RE) crashes. Drivers’ acceleration also is more likely to lead to RE crashes in urban areas. While hard left turns show greater influence of sideswipe and left turn crashes at suburban intersections.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108180"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525002660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing intersection safety analysis studies have primarily focused on macro-level static infrastructure and highly aggregated traffic features. The emergence of Connected Vehicle (CV) has enabled researchers to extract micro-level driving behavior attributes from CVs. Although longitudinal driving behaviors (e.g., hard braking) have been studied recently, critical lateral left and right turn behaviors, which are common and pose potential conflict risk at intersections, have been largely overlooked. Meanwhile, dealing with both spatial heterogeneity and nonlinear effects between crash frequency and multitudinous driving features is another critical challenge for intersection safety analysis. To address such gaps, this study extracted driving behavior features for both longitudinal movements and lateral left and right turns to comprehensively capture driving dynamics at intersections. A novel spatial ML framework was proposed to integrate nonlinear ML models (e.g., LightGBM) with geographically weighted regression: Besides a global ML model training on all samples to fit average estimations, distinct local ML models are trained for each spatial sample with its neighbors to capture localized spatial heterogeneity. Empirical experiments using CV data at a Florida county show that the inclusion of lateral turning behavior (e.g., hard left/right turns) leads to improved accuracy of intersection crash frequency prediction. Compared to traditional Rrandom Forest, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Multilayer Perceptron models, the spatial ML integrating LightGBM demonstrates significant improvements of 5.8%, 6.3%, and 5.6% in RMSE, MAE, and R2, respectively. The results reveal the nonlinear impact of driving features and their spatial heterogeneity: In downtown, hard braking events primarily influence the risk of rear-end (RE) crashes. Drivers’ acceleration also is more likely to lead to RE crashes in urban areas. While hard left turns show greater influence of sideswipe and left turn crashes at suburban intersections.
基于互联车辆数据的纵向和横向危险驾驶行为交叉口碰撞分析:一种空间机器学习方法
现有的交叉口安全分析研究主要集中在宏观层面的静态基础设施和高度聚集的交通特征。互联汽车(CV)的出现使研究人员能够从CV中提取微观层面的驾驶行为属性。虽然纵向驾驶行为(如急刹车)最近得到了研究,但在十字路口常见且具有潜在冲突风险的临界横向左转弯和右转弯行为在很大程度上被忽视了。同时,处理碰撞频率与众多驾驶特征之间的空间异质性和非线性效应是交叉口安全分析的另一个关键挑战。为了解决这些差距,本研究提取了纵向运动和横向左右转弯的驾驶行为特征,以全面捕捉十字路口的驾驶动态。提出了一种新的空间机器学习框架,将非线性机器学习模型(例如LightGBM)与地理加权回归相结合:除了对所有样本进行全局机器学习模型训练以拟合平均估计外,还对每个空间样本及其相邻样本训练不同的局部机器学习模型以捕获局部空间异质性。在佛罗里达州的一个县使用CV数据进行的经验实验表明,包含横向转向行为(例如,向左/向右急转弯)可以提高交叉口碰撞频率预测的准确性。与传统的random Forest、XGBoost、LightGBM和Multilayer Perceptron模型相比,集成LightGBM的空间机器学习在RMSE、MAE和R2上分别提高了5.8%、6.3%和5.6%。研究结果揭示了驾驶特征的非线性影响及其空间异质性:在市区,硬制动事件主要影响追尾碰撞风险;在城市地区,司机的加速也更有可能导致RE碰撞。而在郊区十字路口,急转弯对侧擦和左转事故的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信