Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) in a nutshell: A systematic review based on the empirical evidence from across the globe

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Ridhi Kochar, Anjala Kalsie, Nabajyoti Deka
{"title":"Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) in a nutshell: A systematic review based on the empirical evidence from across the globe","authors":"Ridhi Kochar,&nbsp;Anjala Kalsie,&nbsp;Nabajyoti Deka","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) have attracted various stakeholders to participate in their value chain as they allow carbon credits to be traded. This study systematically reviews the academic literature pertinent to VCMs combined with an analysis of the selected studies on certain bases such as classification based on the climate zones &amp; regions, Global North- Global South perspective, and land use perspective. Further, it also explores the broad themes, the research timeline, and the empirical methods used in the extant literature. Additionally, the study digs into the gendered dimension in certain VCM projects. To fulfill these purposes, sixty-nine studies based on empirical evidence have been chosen from the vast literature. A critical appraisal of the key findings reveals an urgent requirement for a policy framework for VCMs irrespective of the climate zone the study belongs to. A focus on the financial and socio-economic aspects of carbon projects is noted and a substantial difference in the nature of studies conducted in Global North/Global South is observed. Effective land use regarding superior alternatives is cited in informing policymakers and project developers of financially, environmentally, and socially feasible uses. The gender stereotypes revolving around certain VCM-based projects need to be addressed. Drawing upon the critical findings of this study, possible future work in the domain of carbon pricing in VCM, investigating efficient land use to combat climate change, “Women and ESG”, and the unified role of compliance and voluntary markets in mitigating climate change is suggested.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"522 ","pages":"Article 146261"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625016117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voluntary Carbon Markets (VCMs) have attracted various stakeholders to participate in their value chain as they allow carbon credits to be traded. This study systematically reviews the academic literature pertinent to VCMs combined with an analysis of the selected studies on certain bases such as classification based on the climate zones & regions, Global North- Global South perspective, and land use perspective. Further, it also explores the broad themes, the research timeline, and the empirical methods used in the extant literature. Additionally, the study digs into the gendered dimension in certain VCM projects. To fulfill these purposes, sixty-nine studies based on empirical evidence have been chosen from the vast literature. A critical appraisal of the key findings reveals an urgent requirement for a policy framework for VCMs irrespective of the climate zone the study belongs to. A focus on the financial and socio-economic aspects of carbon projects is noted and a substantial difference in the nature of studies conducted in Global North/Global South is observed. Effective land use regarding superior alternatives is cited in informing policymakers and project developers of financially, environmentally, and socially feasible uses. The gender stereotypes revolving around certain VCM-based projects need to be addressed. Drawing upon the critical findings of this study, possible future work in the domain of carbon pricing in VCM, investigating efficient land use to combat climate change, “Women and ESG”, and the unified role of compliance and voluntary markets in mitigating climate change is suggested.
简而言之,自愿碳市场(VCMs):基于全球经验证据的系统回顾
自愿碳市场(VCMs)允许碳信用额进行交易,因此吸引了各种利益相关者参与其价值链。本研究系统地回顾了与vcm相关的学术文献,并在一定的基础上,如基于气候带的分类和分析了选择的研究。区域、全球南北视角和土地利用视角。此外,它还探讨了广泛的主题,研究时间线,以及在现有文献中使用的实证方法。此外,本研究还深入探讨了某些VCM项目中的性别维度。为了实现这些目的,从大量文献中选择了69项基于经验证据的研究。对关键发现的批判性评估表明,无论该研究属于哪个气候带,都迫切需要一个vcm政策框架。注意到对碳项目的财政和社会经济方面的关注,并注意到在全球北方/全球南方进行的研究在性质上有很大的不同。在向决策者和项目开发商通报经济、环境和社会可行的土地利用方案时,引用了有关优越替代方案的有效土地利用。需要解决围绕某些基于vcm的项目的性别陈规定型观念。根据本研究的重要发现,建议未来在VCM碳定价领域可能开展的工作,调查有效的土地利用以应对气候变化,“妇女与ESG”,以及合规和自愿市场在减缓气候变化中的统一作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信