Feasibility of intraoperative indocyanine green injection to identify lymph nodes at risk of metastatic disease for early-stage lung cancer

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Desi K.M. ter Woerds MSc , Roel L.J. Verhoeven PhD , Stefan M. van der Heide MD , Erik H.J.G. Aarntzen MD, PhD , Monika G. Looijen-Salamon MD, PhD , Shoko Vos MD, PhD , Ad F.T.M. Verhagen MD, PhD , Erik H.F.M. van der Heijden MD, PhD
{"title":"Feasibility of intraoperative indocyanine green injection to identify lymph nodes at risk of metastatic disease for early-stage lung cancer","authors":"Desi K.M. ter Woerds MSc ,&nbsp;Roel L.J. Verhoeven PhD ,&nbsp;Stefan M. van der Heide MD ,&nbsp;Erik H.J.G. Aarntzen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Monika G. Looijen-Salamon MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Shoko Vos MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Ad F.T.M. Verhagen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Erik H.F.M. van der Heijden MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.xjtc.2025.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Despite surgical resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection, 34% of patients with stage IB to IIB non–small cell lung cancer demonstrate recurrence within 3.5 years, indicating disease dissemination undetected by current staging methods. Although 23.1% of patients with clinical N0 disease are upstaged to pN1 or pN2 disease after surgery, occult disease may still be present in patients with pN0 disease. The aim of this research was to explore implementation of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure to identify lymph nodes at risk and determine its effect on staging.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this single-center prospective study, patients with cN0 disease with resectable non–small cell lung cancer underwent intraoperative indocyanine green injection followed by the identification of up to 3 SLNs with near-infrared imaging. All lymph nodes were analyzed by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining and the SLNs were additionally analyzed by serial sectioning and cytokeratin staining to detect tumor cells that may be missed by conventional analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SLNs were successfully identified in all 48 patients (100%). In 3 cases, injections were incorrectly positioned, possibly leading to incorrect SLN identification. Eight patients were diagnosed with pN1 or pN2 disease postoperatively; all were detected by conventional pathological assessment. Analysis of correctly performed SLN procedures showed negative SLNs were 100% indicative of absence of metastatic spread downstream. In 2 patients, serial sectioning and cytokeratin staining of the SLN revealed isolated tumor cells in 1 N1 node.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>An intraoperative SLN procedure using indocyanine green is feasible with an identification rate of 100%. A negative SLN was an indicator for absence of metastases in lymph nodes downstream.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53413,"journal":{"name":"JTCVS Techniques","volume":"32 ","pages":"Pages 172-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTCVS Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666250725002238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Despite surgical resection and mediastinal lymph node dissection, 34% of patients with stage IB to IIB non–small cell lung cancer demonstrate recurrence within 3.5 years, indicating disease dissemination undetected by current staging methods. Although 23.1% of patients with clinical N0 disease are upstaged to pN1 or pN2 disease after surgery, occult disease may still be present in patients with pN0 disease. The aim of this research was to explore implementation of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure to identify lymph nodes at risk and determine its effect on staging.

Methods

In this single-center prospective study, patients with cN0 disease with resectable non–small cell lung cancer underwent intraoperative indocyanine green injection followed by the identification of up to 3 SLNs with near-infrared imaging. All lymph nodes were analyzed by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining and the SLNs were additionally analyzed by serial sectioning and cytokeratin staining to detect tumor cells that may be missed by conventional analysis.

Results

SLNs were successfully identified in all 48 patients (100%). In 3 cases, injections were incorrectly positioned, possibly leading to incorrect SLN identification. Eight patients were diagnosed with pN1 or pN2 disease postoperatively; all were detected by conventional pathological assessment. Analysis of correctly performed SLN procedures showed negative SLNs were 100% indicative of absence of metastatic spread downstream. In 2 patients, serial sectioning and cytokeratin staining of the SLN revealed isolated tumor cells in 1 N1 node.

Conclusions

An intraoperative SLN procedure using indocyanine green is feasible with an identification rate of 100%. A negative SLN was an indicator for absence of metastases in lymph nodes downstream.
术中注射吲哚菁绿鉴别早期肺癌淋巴结转移风险的可行性
尽管手术切除和纵隔淋巴结清扫,34%的IB至IIB期非小细胞肺癌患者在3.5年内复发,表明目前的分期方法未检测到疾病的传播。尽管23.1%的临床N0疾病患者在手术后被抢镜为pN1或pN2疾病,但pN0疾病患者仍可能存在隐匿性疾病。本研究的目的是探索前哨淋巴结(SLN)手术的实施,以识别处于危险中的淋巴结,并确定其对分期的影响。方法在这项单中心前瞻性研究中,cN0病变合并可切除的非小细胞肺癌患者术中注射吲哚菁绿,并通过近红外成像识别多达3个sln。所有淋巴结采用常规苏木精染色和伊红染色进行分析,sln采用连续切片和细胞角蛋白染色进行分析,以检测常规分析可能遗漏的肿瘤细胞。结果48例患者均成功鉴定出sln(100%)。3例注射剂位置不正确,可能导致SLN识别错误。8例患者术后诊断为pN1或pN2疾病;均经常规病理检查。正确执行SLN手术的分析显示,阴性SLN 100%表明没有转移扩散。在2例患者中,SLN的连续切片和细胞角蛋白染色显示在1个N1淋巴结中分离出肿瘤细胞。结论术中应用吲哚菁绿进行SLN是可行的,其识别率为100%。SLN阴性表明下游淋巴结没有转移。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JTCVS Techniques
JTCVS Techniques Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
311
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信