Strategic stakeholder analysis for Vietnam’s carbon credit system: a neutrosophic approach

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Phi-Hung Nguyen, Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen, Duc-Minh Vu, Tra-Giang Vu, Anh-Phuong Danh-Nguyen, Thi-Lien Nguyen
{"title":"Strategic stakeholder analysis for Vietnam’s carbon credit system: a neutrosophic approach","authors":"Phi-Hung Nguyen,&nbsp;Lan-Anh Thi Nguyen,&nbsp;Duc-Minh Vu,&nbsp;Tra-Giang Vu,&nbsp;Anh-Phuong Danh-Nguyen,&nbsp;Thi-Lien Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global carbon credit market has evolved into a key mechanism for mitigating climate change, yet challenges persist regarding transparency, stakeholder trust, and market efficiency. Vietnam is in the initial phase of developing its carbon credit framework, driven by its pledge to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Despite regulatory developments, the Vietnamese carbon market remains fragmented, with concerns over pricing disparities, market liquidity, verification standards, and stakeholder engagement. This study assesses stakeholder preferences in Vietnam’s carbon credit system using an advanced Neutrosophic Sets (NS) combined with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Framework, integrating Delphi and DEMATEL methods. Unlike traditional fuzzy logic-based models, NS offers a more refined depiction of uncertainty through the truth, indeterminacy, and falsity integration, enabling a more accurate stakeholder preference modeling. The NS Delphi method is applied to refine expert consensus, while NS DEMATEL identifies interdependencies among key stakeholder concerns, including policy alignment, financial incentives, verification mechanisms, and market accessibility. Findings reveal that regulatory transparency, price stability, and cross-border certification are critical factors shaping market participation. Moreover, private sector involvement and financial institutions play a pivotal role in market development, requiring stronger incentives and risk mitigation measures. The results contribute to both theoretical advancements in decision science and practical policymaking by offering structured recommendations to enhance Vietnam’s carbon trading system. By integrating stakeholder perspectives with uncertainty modeling, this study provides a strategic foundation for developing a more transparent, efficient, and scalable carbon credit framework in Vietnam, ensuring alignment with global carbon pricing mechanisms and fostering long-term sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"11 3","pages":"Article 100597"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853125001325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global carbon credit market has evolved into a key mechanism for mitigating climate change, yet challenges persist regarding transparency, stakeholder trust, and market efficiency. Vietnam is in the initial phase of developing its carbon credit framework, driven by its pledge to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Despite regulatory developments, the Vietnamese carbon market remains fragmented, with concerns over pricing disparities, market liquidity, verification standards, and stakeholder engagement. This study assesses stakeholder preferences in Vietnam’s carbon credit system using an advanced Neutrosophic Sets (NS) combined with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Framework, integrating Delphi and DEMATEL methods. Unlike traditional fuzzy logic-based models, NS offers a more refined depiction of uncertainty through the truth, indeterminacy, and falsity integration, enabling a more accurate stakeholder preference modeling. The NS Delphi method is applied to refine expert consensus, while NS DEMATEL identifies interdependencies among key stakeholder concerns, including policy alignment, financial incentives, verification mechanisms, and market accessibility. Findings reveal that regulatory transparency, price stability, and cross-border certification are critical factors shaping market participation. Moreover, private sector involvement and financial institutions play a pivotal role in market development, requiring stronger incentives and risk mitigation measures. The results contribute to both theoretical advancements in decision science and practical policymaking by offering structured recommendations to enhance Vietnam’s carbon trading system. By integrating stakeholder perspectives with uncertainty modeling, this study provides a strategic foundation for developing a more transparent, efficient, and scalable carbon credit framework in Vietnam, ensuring alignment with global carbon pricing mechanisms and fostering long-term sustainability.
越南碳信用体系的战略利益相关者分析:中性方法
全球碳信用市场已发展成为减缓气候变化的关键机制,但在透明度、利益相关者信任和市场效率方面仍存在挑战。越南正处于制定碳信用框架的初始阶段,其目标是到2050年实现净零排放。尽管监管方面有所发展,但越南碳市场仍然分散,存在定价差异、市场流动性、核查标准和利益相关者参与等问题。本研究利用先进的中性集(NS)和多准则决策(MCDM)框架,结合Delphi和DEMATEL方法,评估了越南碳信用体系中的利益相关者偏好。与传统的基于模糊逻辑的模型不同,NS通过真实、不确定和虚假的整合提供了更精细的不确定性描述,从而实现了更准确的利益相关者偏好建模。NS德尔菲法用于细化专家共识,而NS DEMATEL则确定关键利益相关者关注点之间的相互依赖关系,包括政策一致性、财政激励、验证机制和市场可及性。研究结果表明,监管透明度、价格稳定性和跨境认证是影响市场参与的关键因素。此外,私营部门的参与和金融机构在市场发展中发挥着关键作用,因此需要更强有力的激励措施和减轻风险措施。研究结果通过为加强越南碳交易体系提供结构化建议,为决策科学的理论进步和实际政策制定做出了贡献。通过将利益相关者视角与不确定性模型相结合,本研究为在越南建立更加透明、高效和可扩展的碳信用框架提供了战略基础,确保与全球碳定价机制保持一致,并促进长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信