Palliative Care Consults Among Critically Ill Patients: Does Timing Matter?

IF 1.4
Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman
{"title":"Palliative Care Consults Among Critically Ill Patients: Does Timing Matter?","authors":"Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman","doi":"10.1177/10499091251364245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251364245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251364245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.

危重病人的姑息治疗咨询:时机重要吗?
数据支持危重病人需要姑息治疗。目前尚不清楚临床医生是否能够确定哪些患者将从姑息治疗小组的icu会诊中获益最多。鉴于我们数据的局限性,我们使用住院死亡率作为未满足的姑息治疗需求的代理。方法:我们对2022年在西奈山医院姑息治疗咨询登记的MICU住院时间(LOS)≥72 h的患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用电子健康记录和管理数据,我们比较了接受icu内姑息治疗咨询的患者和接受icu后咨询的患者的社会人口学和临床特征。结果在我们的样本中,195例患者接受了icu内姑息治疗咨询,63例患者接受了icu后咨询。两组之间没有社会人口学或临床差异。与ICU后会诊组相比,接受ICU会诊的患者ICU LOS中位数更长,会诊至出院的天数更长。在住院死亡率方面没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,社会人口学和临床指标不能区分哪些患者接受了icu会诊。然而,无论就诊时间如何,本样本中所有患者的住院死亡率都很高。分娩模式需要确保更多MICU LOS≥72 h的患者接受icu姑息治疗咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信