Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman
{"title":"Palliative Care Consults Among Critically Ill Patients: Does Timing Matter?","authors":"Ankita Mehta, Emily Chai, Samuel Acquah, Joshua Lasseigne, Amy Newman, Li Zeng, Laura P Gelfman","doi":"10.1177/10499091251364245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251364245"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251364245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionData supports the need for palliative care for critically ill patients. It is unclear if clinicians are able to identify which patients would benefit most from an in-ICU consult by the palliative care team. Given the limitations of our data, we used in-hospital mortality as a proxy for unmet palliative care needs.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in our palliative care consultation registry who had a MICU length of stay (LOS) ≥ 72 h at Mount Sinai Hospital in 2022. Using electronic health record and administrative data, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients who received an in-ICU palliative care consult and those who received a post-ICU consult.ResultsIn our sample, 195 patients received an in-ICU palliative care consultation and 63 had a post-ICU consultation. There were no sociodemographic or clinical differences among the two groups. As compared to the post-ICU consult group, patients who received an in-ICU consult had a longer median ICU LOS and had more days between consult and discharge. There was no difference with regards to in-hospital mortality.DiscussionOur findings suggest that sociodemographic and clinical indicators do not distinguish which patients receive an in-ICU consult. Yet, all patients in this sample have a high in-hospital mortality rate regardless of consult timing. Delivery models are needed to ensure more patients with a MICU LOS ≥72 h receive an in-ICU palliative care consult.