Elevated thyroglobulin levels in fine-needle aspiration washout fluid from thyroid nodules: a potential marker of benign nature?

Endokrynologia Polska Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-29 DOI:10.5603/ep.105584
Serhat Uysal, Cem Sulu, Banu Betul Kocaman, Ilkin Muradov, Lala Soltanova, Serdar Sahin, Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Dildar Konukoglu, Taner Damci, Mustafa Sait Gonen
{"title":"Elevated thyroglobulin levels in fine-needle aspiration washout fluid from thyroid nodules: a potential marker of benign nature?","authors":"Serhat Uysal, Cem Sulu, Banu Betul Kocaman, Ilkin Muradov, Lala Soltanova, Serdar Sahin, Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Dildar Konukoglu, Taner Damci, Mustafa Sait Gonen","doi":"10.5603/ep.105584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the relationship between thyroglobulin (Tg) levels obtained from thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cytopathological results.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent FNA between January 2023 and August 2024 in accordance with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System risk scoring. Patients with pure cystic nodules, non-thyroid malignancy, and major psychiatric disorders that could interfere with compliance during the procedure were excluded from the study. FNA-Tg samples were obtained from the nodules using a 22-gauge needle on the first attempt. FNA-Tg levels were then measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. These levels were compared among different patient groups and classified according to the cytopathological examination results based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 193 FNA samples in 193 patients. In 148 (76.7%) out of 193 samples the aspirate was diagnostic. Of these, 101 (68.2%) were benign (Bethesda II), 29 (19.6%) were indeterminate (Bethesda III-IV), and 18 (12.2%) were malignant (Bethesda V-VI). FNA-Tg levels were significantly higher in benign nodules compared to malignant ones (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between concomitant serum Tg levels in patients with benign and malignant nodules (p = 0.614). An FNA-Tg value above 13,262 ng/mL predicted benign cytology with 71.3% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FNA-Tg levels may provide valuable insights into FNA cytology and serve as an effective marker for distinguishing benign nodules from those with malignant characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93990,"journal":{"name":"Endokrynologia Polska","volume":" ","pages":"397-402"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endokrynologia Polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/ep.105584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the relationship between thyroglobulin (Tg) levels obtained from thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and cytopathological results.

Material and methods: This cross-sectional study included patients who underwent FNA between January 2023 and August 2024 in accordance with the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System risk scoring. Patients with pure cystic nodules, non-thyroid malignancy, and major psychiatric disorders that could interfere with compliance during the procedure were excluded from the study. FNA-Tg samples were obtained from the nodules using a 22-gauge needle on the first attempt. FNA-Tg levels were then measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. These levels were compared among different patient groups and classified according to the cytopathological examination results based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 20.

Results: The study included 193 FNA samples in 193 patients. In 148 (76.7%) out of 193 samples the aspirate was diagnostic. Of these, 101 (68.2%) were benign (Bethesda II), 29 (19.6%) were indeterminate (Bethesda III-IV), and 18 (12.2%) were malignant (Bethesda V-VI). FNA-Tg levels were significantly higher in benign nodules compared to malignant ones (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between concomitant serum Tg levels in patients with benign and malignant nodules (p = 0.614). An FNA-Tg value above 13,262 ng/mL predicted benign cytology with 71.3% sensitivity and 77.8% specificity.

Conclusions: FNA-Tg levels may provide valuable insights into FNA cytology and serve as an effective marker for distinguishing benign nodules from those with malignant characteristics.

细针穿刺甲状腺结节冲洗液中甲状腺球蛋白水平升高:良性的潜在标志?
前言:探讨甲状腺细针穿刺(FNA)所得甲状腺球蛋白(Tg)水平与细胞病理学结果的关系。材料和方法:根据美国放射学会甲状腺影像学报告和数据系统风险评分,本横断面研究纳入了2023年1月至2024年8月期间接受FNA的患者。单纯囊性结节、非甲状腺恶性肿瘤和可能影响手术依从性的主要精神疾病患者被排除在研究之外。第一次尝试使用22号针从结节中获得FNA-Tg样品。然后用电化学发光免疫分析法测定FNA-Tg水平。这些水平在不同患者组之间进行比较,并根据基于Bethesda甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统的细胞病理学检查结果进行分类。统计分析使用统计软件包为社会科学,版本20进行。结果:本研究纳入193例患者的193份FNA样本。193例样本中有148例(76.7%)是诊断性的。其中101例(68.2%)为良性(Bethesda II), 29例(19.6%)为不确定(Bethesda III-IV), 18例(12.2%)为恶性(Bethesda V-VI)。良性结节中FNA-Tg水平明显高于恶性结节(p < 0.001)。良、恶性结节患者伴发血清Tg水平差异无统计学意义(p = 0.614)。FNA-Tg值高于13262 ng/mL预测良性细胞学,敏感性为71.3%,特异性为77.8%。结论:FNA- tg水平可以为FNA细胞学提供有价值的见解,并可作为区分良性结节与恶性结节的有效标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信