Evaluating the weighting of extracurricular involvement in standardised curriculum vitae scoring criteria for entrance into Australian medical and surgical speciality training programs.

IF 1.4
Matthew Robertson, Thomas Muecke, Stephen Bacchi, Robert Casson, Weng Onn Chan
{"title":"Evaluating the weighting of extracurricular involvement in standardised curriculum vitae scoring criteria for entrance into Australian medical and surgical speciality training programs.","authors":"Matthew Robertson, Thomas Muecke, Stephen Bacchi, Robert Casson, Weng Onn Chan","doi":"10.1071/AH24348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aims to evaluate how extracurricular involvement, such as sports, music, volunteering and teaching, are weighted within standardised curriculum vitae (CV) scoring criteria for medical officers applying to medical and surgical specialty training programs in Australia. Methods A cross-sectional observational analysis of point allocations for extracurricular involvement was performed, as detailed by publicly available standardised CV scoring criteria for medical and surgical training programs. The analysis includes all specialty training programs in Australian and New Zealand listed by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency that publish these criteria for the 2023 intake. Results Of the 47 reviewed specialty training programs, 14 publish publicly available standardised CV scoring criteria, and 8 of these allocate points for extracurricular involvement. The mean weighting for extracurricular involvement was 11.5% (range 4.5-20%), compared with 42.5% for research. The allocation of points varies by training program and subdomain. Conclusion The weighting of extracurricular involvement within standardised CV scoring criteria is limited and varied among specialty training programs, despite alignment with non-cognitive competencies emphasised by training frameworks. Current emphasis on academic achievements may disadvantage applicants with limited access to research opportunities. Greater clarity and consistency in evaluating non-academic attributes may support fairer, more holistic selection processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aims to evaluate how extracurricular involvement, such as sports, music, volunteering and teaching, are weighted within standardised curriculum vitae (CV) scoring criteria for medical officers applying to medical and surgical specialty training programs in Australia. Methods A cross-sectional observational analysis of point allocations for extracurricular involvement was performed, as detailed by publicly available standardised CV scoring criteria for medical and surgical training programs. The analysis includes all specialty training programs in Australian and New Zealand listed by the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency that publish these criteria for the 2023 intake. Results Of the 47 reviewed specialty training programs, 14 publish publicly available standardised CV scoring criteria, and 8 of these allocate points for extracurricular involvement. The mean weighting for extracurricular involvement was 11.5% (range 4.5-20%), compared with 42.5% for research. The allocation of points varies by training program and subdomain. Conclusion The weighting of extracurricular involvement within standardised CV scoring criteria is limited and varied among specialty training programs, despite alignment with non-cognitive competencies emphasised by training frameworks. Current emphasis on academic achievements may disadvantage applicants with limited access to research opportunities. Greater clarity and consistency in evaluating non-academic attributes may support fairer, more holistic selection processes.

评估课外活动在进入澳大利亚医学和外科专业培训项目的标准化简历评分标准中的权重。
本研究旨在评估在澳大利亚申请医学和外科专业培训项目的医务人员的标准化简历(CV)评分标准中,课外参与(如体育、音乐、志愿服务和教学)的权重。方法采用公开可用的医学和外科培训项目标准化CV评分标准,对课外活动的分值进行横断面观察分析。该分析包括澳大利亚健康从业者监管机构列出的澳大利亚和新西兰的所有专业培训项目,该机构公布了这些2023年入学标准。结果:在47个专业培训项目中,14个公开发布了标准化的简历评分标准,其中8个为课外参与分配分数。课外活动的平均权重为11.5%(范围为4.5-20%),而研究的平均权重为42.5%。分数的分配因训练计划和子领域而异。结论:尽管专业培训框架强调非认知能力,但课外活动在标准化CV评分标准中的权重有限且各不相同。目前对学术成就的重视可能会使申请人在获得研究机会方面处于不利地位。在评估非学术属性方面更加清晰和一致,可能会支持更公平、更全面的选拔过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信