High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Prolongs Safe Apnea Time in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S518271
Guiyu Lei, Siliu Yang, Lili Wu, Yue Yin, Chunhua Xi, Qingwen Yang, Guyan Wang
{"title":"High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Prolongs Safe Apnea Time in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Guiyu Lei, Siliu Yang, Lili Wu, Yue Yin, Chunhua Xi, Qingwen Yang, Guyan Wang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S518271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for rapid oxygen desaturation during anesthesia induction. Apneic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has proven effective in prolonging safe apnea time in various patient populations. However, evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in OSA patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of HFNO during anesthesia induction in OSA patients prolongs safe apnea time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective randomized clinical trial, all participants underwent standardized pre-oxygenation and anesthesia induction. During the apneic period, oxygen was delivered either via HFNO at 60L/min (HFNO group) or with the nasal cannula left in place but disconnected from the oxygen source (control group, no supplemental oxygen). The primary outcome of this study was the time to peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO<sub>2</sub> < 95%) during apneic oxygenation. Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO<sub>2,</sub> re-oxygenation time, and tcCO<sub>2</sub> levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HFNO group demonstrated a significantly prolonged safe apnea time compared to the Control group (18.1 [12.1,18.8] vs 4.2 [2.5,6.3] minutes; <i>p</i> <0.001). Additionally, minimum SpO<sub>2</sub> levels were higher, and re-oxygenation time was shorter in the HFNO group (<i>p</i> <0.001 for both). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a substantially reduced risk of desaturation in the HFNO group (hazard ratio: 0.071; 95% CI, 0.021-0.222; <i>p</i> <0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this randomized controlled trial, HFNO significantly prolongs safe apnea time and enhances oxygenation during anesthesia induction in OSA patients. These findings highlight the potential of HFNO to improve perioperative airway management and patient safety in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"2469-2477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S518271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are at high risk for rapid oxygen desaturation during anesthesia induction. Apneic oxygenation with high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) has proven effective in prolonging safe apnea time in various patient populations. However, evidence for the efficacy of HFNO in OSA patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the use of HFNO during anesthesia induction in OSA patients prolongs safe apnea time.

Methods: In this prospective randomized clinical trial, all participants underwent standardized pre-oxygenation and anesthesia induction. During the apneic period, oxygen was delivered either via HFNO at 60L/min (HFNO group) or with the nasal cannula left in place but disconnected from the oxygen source (control group, no supplemental oxygen). The primary outcome of this study was the time to peripheral oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 95%) during apneic oxygenation. Secondary outcomes included minimum SpO2, re-oxygenation time, and tcCO2 levels.

Results: The HFNO group demonstrated a significantly prolonged safe apnea time compared to the Control group (18.1 [12.1,18.8] vs 4.2 [2.5,6.3] minutes; p <0.001). Additionally, minimum SpO2 levels were higher, and re-oxygenation time was shorter in the HFNO group (p <0.001 for both). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a substantially reduced risk of desaturation in the HFNO group (hazard ratio: 0.071; 95% CI, 0.021-0.222; p <0.001). No serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusion: In this randomized controlled trial, HFNO significantly prolongs safe apnea time and enhances oxygenation during anesthesia induction in OSA patients. These findings highlight the potential of HFNO to improve perioperative airway management and patient safety in this high-risk population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

高流量鼻吸氧延长全麻阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的安全呼吸暂停时间:一项随机对照试验。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者在麻醉诱导过程中存在快速氧去饱和的高风险。在不同的患者群体中,高流量鼻氧(HFNO)在延长安全呼吸暂停时间方面已被证明是有效的。然而,关于HFNO对OSA患者疗效的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评价在OSA患者麻醉诱导过程中使用HFNO是否延长了安全呼吸暂停时间。方法:在这项前瞻性随机临床试验中,所有参与者都进行了标准化的预充氧和麻醉诱导。在呼吸暂停期间,通过高氧一氧化氮以60L/min的速度给氧(高氧一氧化氮组)或保留鼻插管,但与氧气源断开(对照组,不补充氧气)。本研究的主要终点是在无氧氧合期间外周氧去饱和(SpO2 < 95%)的时间。次要结局包括最低SpO2、再氧化时间和tcCO2水平。结果:与对照组相比,HFNO组明显延长了安全呼吸暂停时间(18.1 [12.1,18.8]vs 4.2[2.5,6.3]分钟;结论:在本随机对照试验中,高氧一氧化氮能显著延长OSA患者麻醉诱导时的安全呼吸时间,增强患者的氧合能力。这些发现强调了HFNO在改善高危人群围手术期气道管理和患者安全方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信