Cochlear Implantation in Ménière's Disease.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Justin Cottrell, Arianna Winchester, David Friedmann, Sean McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Daniel Jethanamest
{"title":"Cochlear Implantation in Ménière's Disease.","authors":"Justin Cottrell, Arianna Winchester, David Friedmann, Sean McMenomey, J Thomas Roland, Daniel Jethanamest","doi":"10.1159/000547572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cochlear implantation has demonstrated benefit for restoring hearing in patients with Ménière's disease. We sought to examine disease and management factors that may influence postoperative speech performance and vertigo control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective chart review between 2010 and 2023 of patients with Ménière's disease receiving a cochlear implant (CI). The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative word recognition score on Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) testing. Postoperative vertigo control was assessed as a secondary outcome. Variables including concurrent labyrinthectomy, pre- and postoperative Ménière's disease symptoms and treatments, duration of deafness, and hearing loss laterality were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five patients were identified over the study period. Of those, 9 (36%) also underwent labyrinthectomy; 6 (67%) were performed simultaneously with CI and 3 (33%) received a CI following surgical ablation. There was a statistically significant (p = 0.03) higher rate of bilateral Ménière's disease in the CI-only cohort (n = 9, 56%), compared to the cochlear implant and labyrinthectomy (CI + L) cohort (n = 1, 11%). There was also a higher rate of preoperative uncontrolled vertigo (n = 5, 56%) in the CI + L cohort compared to the CI-only cohort (n = 3, 20%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The average pre- and postoperative CNC score for the CI + L cohort was 3.6 (SD 5.9) and 36.7 (SD 17.5), respectively, and 7.1 (SD 10.1) and 62.1 (SD 14.3) for the CI-only group. There was a statistically significant difference noted at most recent CNC follow-up testing (p = 0.01) between the CI + L and CI-only group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Ménière's disease meeting CI candidacy criteria may undergo CI safely and achieve speech performance benefit. A trend toward worse performance in patients who undergo concurrent labyrinthectomy with CI compared to CI alone was seen which warrants further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547572","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implantation has demonstrated benefit for restoring hearing in patients with Ménière's disease. We sought to examine disease and management factors that may influence postoperative speech performance and vertigo control.

Methods: A single-center retrospective chart review between 2010 and 2023 of patients with Ménière's disease receiving a cochlear implant (CI). The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative word recognition score on Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) testing. Postoperative vertigo control was assessed as a secondary outcome. Variables including concurrent labyrinthectomy, pre- and postoperative Ménière's disease symptoms and treatments, duration of deafness, and hearing loss laterality were analyzed.

Results: Twenty-five patients were identified over the study period. Of those, 9 (36%) also underwent labyrinthectomy; 6 (67%) were performed simultaneously with CI and 3 (33%) received a CI following surgical ablation. There was a statistically significant (p = 0.03) higher rate of bilateral Ménière's disease in the CI-only cohort (n = 9, 56%), compared to the cochlear implant and labyrinthectomy (CI + L) cohort (n = 1, 11%). There was also a higher rate of preoperative uncontrolled vertigo (n = 5, 56%) in the CI + L cohort compared to the CI-only cohort (n = 3, 20%), although this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The average pre- and postoperative CNC score for the CI + L cohort was 3.6 (SD 5.9) and 36.7 (SD 17.5), respectively, and 7.1 (SD 10.1) and 62.1 (SD 14.3) for the CI-only group. There was a statistically significant difference noted at most recent CNC follow-up testing (p = 0.01) between the CI + L and CI-only group.

Conclusion: Patients with Ménière's disease meeting CI candidacy criteria may undergo CI safely and achieve speech performance benefit. A trend toward worse performance in patients who undergo concurrent labyrinthectomy with CI compared to CI alone was seen which warrants further study.

Meniérè病的人工耳蜗植入。
人工耳蜗植入术对梅尼埃氏病患者的听力恢复有明显的益处。我们试图检查可能影响术后语言表现和眩晕控制的疾病和管理因素。方法对2010-2023年接受人工耳蜗(CI)治疗的梅尼埃病患者进行单中心回顾性分析。主要结果是术后一年的单词识别辅音-核-辅音(CNC)测试得分。术后眩晕控制作为次要结果进行评估。分析变量包括并发迷路切除术、术前和术后梅尼埃病症状和治疗、耳聋持续时间和听力损失侧边性。结果25例患者在研究期间被确定。其中9例(36%)同时行迷路切除术;6例(67%)与CI同时进行,3例(33%)在手术消融后接受CI。单纯CI组双侧梅尼埃病发生率(n= 9,56%)高于人工耳蜗+迷路切除术组(n= 1,11%),差异有统计学意义(p = 0.03)。CI+L组的术前未控制眩晕发生率(n= 5.56%)也高于仅CI组(n= 3.20%),尽管这没有达到统计学意义(p=0.08)。CI+L组的平均术前和术后CNC评分分别为3.6 (SD 5.9)和36.7 (SD 17.5),仅CI组的平均评分为7.1 (SD 10.1)和62.1 (SD 14.3)。CI+L组和仅CI组在最近的CNC随访测试中有统计学显著差异(p = 0.01)。结论符合人工耳蜗候选标准的梅尼埃病患者可安全接受人工耳蜗植入,并可获得良好的语言表现。与单纯CI相比,同时行迷路切除术合并CI的患者表现更差,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信