Aditya Mahadevan, Armon Azizi, Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Jennifer Valerin, April Choi, Harry Nguyen, Farshid Dayyani
{"title":"First-line use of antiangiogenic agents in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a double-edged sword?","authors":"Aditya Mahadevan, Armon Azizi, Nadine Abi-Jaoudeh, Jennifer Valerin, April Choi, Harry Nguyen, Farshid Dayyani","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver malignancy, have historically been limited, particularly in unresectable cases with underlying cirrhosis. Initial systemic therapy with antiangiogenic agents, notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as sorafenib, showed modest survival gains but lacked durable responses. Subsequent trials with more potent VEGF pathway inhibitors failed to improve overall survival significantly, raising concerns about the long-term utility and potential hepatic and renal toxicities of prolonged VEGF blockade. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) marked a paradigm shift. Trial results demonstrating that dual-ICI regimens induced more durable responses and achieved higher long-term survival rates have challenged the prior VEGF-centric therapeutic approach and suggest that early use of dual ICIs may offer a more transformative effect on disease trajectory. Although anti-VEGF therapies remain valuable for initial tumor shrinkage, prolonged use may compromise liver regeneration and worsen portal hypertension. A refined treatment strategy emphasizing VEGF inhibition for a limited duration followed by or combined with ICIs may optimize both efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI response and on developing regimens that maximize long-term survival in unresectable HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":51585,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","volume":"23 5","pages":"301-306"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most prevalent primary liver malignancy, have historically been limited, particularly in unresectable cases with underlying cirrhosis. Initial systemic therapy with antiangiogenic agents, notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors such as sorafenib, showed modest survival gains but lacked durable responses. Subsequent trials with more potent VEGF pathway inhibitors failed to improve overall survival significantly, raising concerns about the long-term utility and potential hepatic and renal toxicities of prolonged VEGF blockade. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) marked a paradigm shift. Trial results demonstrating that dual-ICI regimens induced more durable responses and achieved higher long-term survival rates have challenged the prior VEGF-centric therapeutic approach and suggest that early use of dual ICIs may offer a more transformative effect on disease trajectory. Although anti-VEGF therapies remain valuable for initial tumor shrinkage, prolonged use may compromise liver regeneration and worsen portal hypertension. A refined treatment strategy emphasizing VEGF inhibition for a limited duration followed by or combined with ICIs may optimize both efficacy and safety. Future research should focus on identifying predictive biomarkers for ICI response and on developing regimens that maximize long-term survival in unresectable HCC.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology (CAH&O) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal reaching more than 27,000 hematology and oncology clinicians. CAH&O provides editorial content encompassing a wide array of topics relevant and useful to the fields of oncology and hematology, both separately and together. Content is directed by the strong input of today’s top thought leaders in hematology & oncology, including feature-length review articles, monthly columns consisting of engaging interviews with experts on current issues in solid tumor oncology, hematologic malignancies, hematologic disorders, drug development, and clinical case studies with expert commentary. CAH&O also publishes industry-supported meeting highlights, clinical roundtable monographs, and clinical review supplements.