[Person-centered wound care : Legitimation and theoretical concept].

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Eva-Maria Panfil, Joachim Dissemond, Julian-Dario Rembe, Bernd Assenheimer, Veronika Gerber, Christian Hafner, Peter Kurz, Martin Motzkus, Robert Strohal, Jürg Traber, Sebastian Probst
{"title":"[Person-centered wound care : Legitimation and theoretical concept].","authors":"Eva-Maria Panfil, Joachim Dissemond, Julian-Dario Rembe, Bernd Assenheimer, Veronika Gerber, Christian Hafner, Peter Kurz, Martin Motzkus, Robert Strohal, Jürg Traber, Sebastian Probst","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02466-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>International associations advocate the care model of person-centered care (PCC) that focuses on people with chronic illnesses rather than on disease patterns.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present the concept and its legitimacy concerning the care of people with chronic wounds.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A narrative review, identification and analysis of review articles as well as conceptual foundations, practical examples and discussion of implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCC is based on the health needs, expectations, values and commitments of persons and not on diseases, symptoms and clinical data. Key components include providing the affected individuals with the support and education needed to make decisions and participate in their own care. Evaluations of PCC implementation primarily measure components, such as communication or shared decision making and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM). The largest barriers to implementing the concept are a healthcare system focused on acute care, a lack of patient involvement in decision making, inadequate communication skills and disease-oriented attitudes. A successful implementation requires cultural, structural and organizational measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing PCC into the clinical practice requires commitment and perseverance. Organizations must be willing to engage in this approach. The German-Austrian-Swiss Wound Healing Organization (WundD.A.CH) has identified the promotion of its implementation as a key priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"511-516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12454617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02466-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: International associations advocate the care model of person-centered care (PCC) that focuses on people with chronic illnesses rather than on disease patterns.

Objective: To present the concept and its legitimacy concerning the care of people with chronic wounds.

Material and method: A narrative review, identification and analysis of review articles as well as conceptual foundations, practical examples and discussion of implementation.

Results: The PCC is based on the health needs, expectations, values and commitments of persons and not on diseases, symptoms and clinical data. Key components include providing the affected individuals with the support and education needed to make decisions and participate in their own care. Evaluations of PCC implementation primarily measure components, such as communication or shared decision making and use patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and patient-reported experience measures (PREM). The largest barriers to implementing the concept are a healthcare system focused on acute care, a lack of patient involvement in decision making, inadequate communication skills and disease-oriented attitudes. A successful implementation requires cultural, structural and organizational measures.

Conclusion: Implementing PCC into the clinical practice requires commitment and perseverance. Organizations must be willing to engage in this approach. The German-Austrian-Swiss Wound Healing Organization (WundD.A.CH) has identified the promotion of its implementation as a key priority.

[以人为本的伤口护理:正当性与理论概念]。
背景:国际协会提倡以人为中心的护理模式(PCC),重点关注慢性病患者,而不是疾病模式。目的:介绍慢性创伤患者护理的概念及其合法性。材料和方法:一个叙述性的评论,识别和分析的评论文章,以及概念基础,实际的例子和实施的讨论。结果:PCC是基于个人的健康需求、期望、价值观和承诺,而不是基于疾病、症状和临床数据。关键组成部分包括向受影响的个人提供必要的支持和教育,使他们能够作出决定并参与自己的护理。PCC实施的评估主要衡量要素,如沟通或共同决策,并使用患者报告的结果测量(PROM)和患者报告的经验测量(PREM)。实施这一概念的最大障碍是专注于急症护理的医疗保健系统,缺乏患者参与决策,缺乏沟通技巧和以疾病为导向的态度。成功的实施需要文化、结构和组织措施。结论:在临床实践中实施PCC需要有决心和毅力。组织必须愿意采用这种方法。德国-奥地利-瑞士伤口愈合组织(WundD.A.CH)已将促进其实施确定为关键优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信