Revolutionizing Brain Research Using Portable MRI in Field Settings: Public Perspectives on the Ethical and Legal Challenges.

IF 3.8 4区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Neuroethics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4
Molly K Madzelan, Frances Lawrenz, Susan M Wolf, Francis X Shen
{"title":"Revolutionizing Brain Research Using Portable MRI in Field Settings: Public Perspectives on the Ethical and Legal Challenges.","authors":"Molly K Madzelan, Frances Lawrenz, Susan M Wolf, Francis X Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>New, highly portable MRI (pMRI) technology promises to revolutionize brain research by facilitating field-based studies that can expand research to new settings beyond the traditional MRI suite in a medical center. At this early stage of development, understanding public knowledge and attitudes about pMRI research is crucial.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this article we present the first empirical study of the general public's willingness to participate in pMRI research, and their perceptions of expected benefits and concerns.</p><p><strong>Methods & results: </strong>We conducted a nationally representative online survey (N = 2,001) administered Aug. 15-31, 2022. We found that respondents were overwhelmingly willing to participate in pMRI research, with no significant differences between five key demographic sub-groups: rural residents, older adults (65+), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks, and those economically disadvantaged. Respondents saw many potential benefits (e.g., follow-up information about the study's results) and few concerns (e.g., insufficient payment) associated with participating.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Such high public interest in participating confirms the importance of developing ethical guidance for pMRI research now, before that research rapidly expands. The results speak to the importance of minimizing the therapeutic misconception in pMRI research, as the survey reveals gaps in participant knowledge about the capabilities and limitations of pMRI devices to provide clinically informative scans. Our data showed that a lack of trust in scientists can reduce likelihood of participation, and thus researchers will need to engage participant communities to fully realize the potential of pMRI research to reach remote and historically underrepresented populations.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":49255,"journal":{"name":"Neuroethics","volume":"18 2","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: New, highly portable MRI (pMRI) technology promises to revolutionize brain research by facilitating field-based studies that can expand research to new settings beyond the traditional MRI suite in a medical center. At this early stage of development, understanding public knowledge and attitudes about pMRI research is crucial.

Objective: In this article we present the first empirical study of the general public's willingness to participate in pMRI research, and their perceptions of expected benefits and concerns.

Methods & results: We conducted a nationally representative online survey (N = 2,001) administered Aug. 15-31, 2022. We found that respondents were overwhelmingly willing to participate in pMRI research, with no significant differences between five key demographic sub-groups: rural residents, older adults (65+), Hispanics, non-Hispanic Blacks, and those economically disadvantaged. Respondents saw many potential benefits (e.g., follow-up information about the study's results) and few concerns (e.g., insufficient payment) associated with participating.

Conclusion: Such high public interest in participating confirms the importance of developing ethical guidance for pMRI research now, before that research rapidly expands. The results speak to the importance of minimizing the therapeutic misconception in pMRI research, as the survey reveals gaps in participant knowledge about the capabilities and limitations of pMRI devices to provide clinically informative scans. Our data showed that a lack of trust in scientists can reduce likelihood of participation, and thus researchers will need to engage participant communities to fully realize the potential of pMRI research to reach remote and historically underrepresented populations.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

革命性的大脑研究使用便携式核磁共振成像在现场设置:对伦理和法律挑战的公众观点。
简介:新的、高度便携的MRI (pMRI)技术有望通过促进基于现场的研究,将研究扩展到医疗中心传统MRI套件之外的新环境,从而彻底改变大脑研究。在发展的早期阶段,了解公众对pMRI研究的认识和态度至关重要。目的:在本文中,我们首次对公众参与pMRI研究的意愿进行实证研究,以及他们对预期收益和关注点的看法。方法与结果:我们于2022年8月15日至31日进行了一项具有全国代表性的在线调查(N = 2001)。我们发现受访者绝大多数愿意参与pMRI研究,五个关键人口亚组之间没有显著差异:农村居民、老年人(65岁以上)、西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人和经济弱势群体。受访者看到了许多潜在的好处(例如,关于研究结果的后续信息),以及与参与相关的一些问题(例如,支付不足)。结论:如此高的公众参与兴趣证实了在pMRI研究迅速扩大之前,现在制定pMRI研究伦理指导的重要性。调查结果显示,参与者对pMRI设备提供临床信息扫描的能力和局限性的认识存在差距,因此,将pMRI研究中的治疗误解最小化是非常重要的。我们的数据表明,对科学家缺乏信任会降低参与的可能性,因此研究人员需要让参与者社区充分认识到pMRI研究的潜力,以达到偏远和历史上代表性不足的人群。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s12152-025-09606-4获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroethics
Neuroethics MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroethics is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to academic articles on the ethical, legal, political, social and philosophical questions provoked by research in the contemporary sciences of the mind and brain; especially, but not only, neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal publishes articles on questions raised by the sciences of the brain and mind, and on the ways in which the sciences of the brain and mind illuminate longstanding debates in ethics and philosophy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信