Parental education and older workers' income : A comparison of social democratic and conservative welfare regimes.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Alina Schmitz
{"title":"Parental education and older workers' income : A comparison of social democratic and conservative welfare regimes.","authors":"Alina Schmitz","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02475-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines whether parental education is related to income among older workers and whether this association varies across welfare regimes. While education is often viewed as a social equalizer, family background may still influence economic outcomes in later life. The study explores how societal contexts moderate inequalities related to family origins.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>(1) Is parental education related to income among older workers, after accounting for job and sociodemographic characteristics? (2) Does this relationship differ between social democratic and conservative welfare regimes?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using wave 9 (2021/2022) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the analysis focuses on individuals aged 50-65 years from 8 countries, grouped into social democratic (Sweden, Denmark, Finland) and conservative (Austria, Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg) regimes. The outcome is annual earnings from (self-)employment and the key predictor is parental education. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were run separately by regime, controlling for job characteristics and sociodemographic covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Parental education was unrelated to income in social democratic regimes but middle and high parental education (compared to low parental education) was positively associated with income in conservative regimes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inequalities in financial well-being in later life cannot be fully understood without considering intergenerational dynamics and the broader institutional context in which they unfold. Income in later life is shaped by family origin at least in conservative welfare regimes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"458-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02475-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examines whether parental education is related to income among older workers and whether this association varies across welfare regimes. While education is often viewed as a social equalizer, family background may still influence economic outcomes in later life. The study explores how societal contexts moderate inequalities related to family origins.

Objective: (1) Is parental education related to income among older workers, after accounting for job and sociodemographic characteristics? (2) Does this relationship differ between social democratic and conservative welfare regimes?

Methods: Using wave 9 (2021/2022) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), the analysis focuses on individuals aged 50-65 years from 8 countries, grouped into social democratic (Sweden, Denmark, Finland) and conservative (Austria, Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg) regimes. The outcome is annual earnings from (self-)employment and the key predictor is parental education. Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were run separately by regime, controlling for job characteristics and sociodemographic covariates.

Results: Parental education was unrelated to income in social democratic regimes but middle and high parental education (compared to low parental education) was positively associated with income in conservative regimes.

Conclusion: Inequalities in financial well-being in later life cannot be fully understood without considering intergenerational dynamics and the broader institutional context in which they unfold. Income in later life is shaped by family origin at least in conservative welfare regimes.

父母教育与老年工人收入:社会民主与保守福利制度的比较。
背景:本研究考察了父母教育是否与老年工人的收入有关,以及这种联系是否因福利制度而异。虽然教育通常被视为社会均衡器,但家庭背景仍可能影响晚年的经济成果。该研究探讨了社会背景如何缓和与家庭出身相关的不平等。目的:(1)在考虑工作和社会人口特征后,父母教育程度是否与老年工人的收入有关?(2)这种关系在社会民主主义和保守主义福利制度之间是否有所不同?方法:利用欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查(SHARE)的第9波(2021/2022),分析了来自8个国家50-65岁的个人,分为社会民主(瑞典、丹麦、芬兰)和保守(奥地利、德国、法国、比利时、卢森堡)政权。结果是(自主)职业的年收入,而关键的预测因素是父母的教育。普通最小二乘(OLS)回归按制度单独运行,控制工作特征和社会人口统计协变量。结果:在社会民主政体中,父母受教育程度与收入无关,而在保守政体中,父母受教育程度中高与收入呈正相关(与父母受教育程度低相比)。结论:如果不考虑代际动态及其展开的更广泛的制度背景,就无法充分理解晚年经济福祉的不平等。至少在保守的福利制度中,晚年的收入是由家庭出身决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信