The impact of microcatheter-to-vessel size ratio on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy-an in vitro quantitative study: Comparative study of different microcatheter sizes in different neurovascular models.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Riccardo Tiberi, Jiahui Li, Magda Jablonska, Joan Daniel Vargas, Alejandro Tomasello, Marc Ribo
{"title":"The impact of microcatheter-to-vessel size ratio on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy-an in vitro quantitative study: Comparative study of different microcatheter sizes in different neurovascular models.","authors":"Riccardo Tiberi, Jiahui Li, Magda Jablonska, Joan Daniel Vargas, Alejandro Tomasello, Marc Ribo","doi":"10.1177/15910199251359359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background and purposeMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard for treating large vessel occlusions. Given the variability in vessel anatomy among patients and the sometimes arbitrary selection of devices by neurointerventionalists, the choice of microcatheter size requires thorough evaluation. We aim to evaluate the impact of device-to-vessel size ratio on periprocedural distal embolization.Materials and methodsFragment-prone clot analogs (length = 9.86±0.07 mm) were used to embolize three different vessels (lumen = 2.0, 2.5, 3.5 mm) in a three-dimensional-printed neurovascular model. Three different microcatheter sizes (0.017″, 0.021″, 0.027″) were used to cross the lesion and subsequently, migrated clot fragments were collected in an outflow filter for image analysis. Experiments were conducted both with and without a microguidewire. A total of 180 experiments were performed: 60 for each M1 segment of middle cerebral artery size, including 20 for each microcatheter-10 with J-shaped microguidewire and 10 without.ResultsAcross all vessels, the 0.027″ microcatheter caused more distal embolizations compared to 0.017″ (p = 0.04) and 0.021″ (p = 0.01). In the 2 mm M1-MCA, 0.017″ microcatheter reduced emboli compared to 0.021″ (p = 0.062) and 0.027″ (p = 0.017). Procedures in the 2 mm vessel are significantly more prone to embolization compared to larger M1 segments (p < 0.05). Microcatheter-to-vessel ratio ≥0.38 significantly increases risk of distal embolization. The use of microguidewire in the procedures did not have any impact on distal embolization (p = 0.871).ConclusionA larger device-to-vessel size ratio induces an increase in distal embolization. Neurointerventionalists should carefully consider vessel anatomy for appropriate microcatheter size selection to minimize the risk of distal embolization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199251359359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199251359359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purposeMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the gold standard for treating large vessel occlusions. Given the variability in vessel anatomy among patients and the sometimes arbitrary selection of devices by neurointerventionalists, the choice of microcatheter size requires thorough evaluation. We aim to evaluate the impact of device-to-vessel size ratio on periprocedural distal embolization.Materials and methodsFragment-prone clot analogs (length = 9.86±0.07 mm) were used to embolize three different vessels (lumen = 2.0, 2.5, 3.5 mm) in a three-dimensional-printed neurovascular model. Three different microcatheter sizes (0.017″, 0.021″, 0.027″) were used to cross the lesion and subsequently, migrated clot fragments were collected in an outflow filter for image analysis. Experiments were conducted both with and without a microguidewire. A total of 180 experiments were performed: 60 for each M1 segment of middle cerebral artery size, including 20 for each microcatheter-10 with J-shaped microguidewire and 10 without.ResultsAcross all vessels, the 0.027″ microcatheter caused more distal embolizations compared to 0.017″ (p = 0.04) and 0.021″ (p = 0.01). In the 2 mm M1-MCA, 0.017″ microcatheter reduced emboli compared to 0.021″ (p = 0.062) and 0.027″ (p = 0.017). Procedures in the 2 mm vessel are significantly more prone to embolization compared to larger M1 segments (p < 0.05). Microcatheter-to-vessel ratio ≥0.38 significantly increases risk of distal embolization. The use of microguidewire in the procedures did not have any impact on distal embolization (p = 0.871).ConclusionA larger device-to-vessel size ratio induces an increase in distal embolization. Neurointerventionalists should carefully consider vessel anatomy for appropriate microcatheter size selection to minimize the risk of distal embolization.

机械取栓过程中微导管与血管尺寸比对远端栓塞的影响——体外定量研究:不同微导管尺寸在不同神经血管模型中的比较研究。
背景与目的机械取栓是治疗大血管闭塞的金标准。考虑到患者血管解剖的可变性和神经介入医师有时随意选择的设备,微导管尺寸的选择需要彻底的评估。我们的目的是评估装置与血管的大小比对手术期远端栓塞的影响。材料与方法采用易碎血栓类似物(长度= 9.86±0.07 mm)栓塞三维打印神经血管模型的三条不同血管(管腔= 2.0,2.5,3.5 mm)。使用三种不同尺寸的微导管(0.017″,0.021″,0.027″)穿过病变,随后在流出过滤器中收集迁移的凝块碎片进行图像分析。实验在有微导丝和没有微导丝的情况下进行。共进行180次实验,每条大脑中动脉M1段60次,每条微导管20次,其中有j型微导丝10次,无j型微导丝10次。结果在所有血管中,与0.017″(p = 0.04)和0.021″(p = 0.01)相比,0.027″微导管引起的远端栓塞更多。在2mm M1-MCA中,与0.021″(p = 0.062)和0.027″(p = 0.017)相比,0.017″微导管减少栓塞。与较大的M1段相比,2mm血管的手术更容易发生栓塞
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信