Genetic inference of on-target and off-target side-effects of antipsychotic medications.

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Andrew R Elmore, Aws Sadik, Lavinia Paternoster, Golam M Khandaker, Tom R Gaunt, Gibran Hemani
{"title":"Genetic inference of on-target and off-target side-effects of antipsychotic medications.","authors":"Andrew R Elmore, Aws Sadik, Lavinia Paternoster, Golam M Khandaker, Tom R Gaunt, Gibran Hemani","doi":"10.1371/journal.pgen.1011793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is often difficult to ascertain whether patient-reported side-effects are caused by a drug, and if so, through which mechanism. Adverse side-effects are the primary cause of antipsychotic drug discontinuation rather than poor efficacy. Using a novel method combining genetic and drug binding affinity data, we investigated evidence of causal mechanisms for 80 reported side-effects of 6 commonly prescribed antipsychotic drugs which together target 68 receptors. We analysed publicly available drug binding affinity data and genetic association data using Mendelian randomization and genetic colocalization to devise a representative 'score' for each combination of drug, side-effect, and receptor. We show that 36 side-effects are likely caused by drug action through 30 receptors, which are mainly attributable to off-target effects (26 off-target receptors underlying 39 side-effects). This method allowed us to distinguish which reported side-effects have evidence of causality. Of individual drugs, clozapine has the largest cumulative side-effect profile (Score = 57.5, SE = 11.2), and the largest number of side-effects (n = 36). We show that two well-known side-effects for clozapine, neutropenia and weight change, are underpinned by the action of GABA and CHRM3 receptors respectively. Our novel genetic approach can map side-effects to drugs and elucidate underlying mechanisms, which could potentially inform clinical practice, drug repurposing, and pharmacological development. Further, this method can be generalized to infer the on-target and off-target effects of drugs at any stage of the drug development pipeline.</p>","PeriodicalId":49007,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Genetics","volume":"21 7","pages":"e1011793"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often difficult to ascertain whether patient-reported side-effects are caused by a drug, and if so, through which mechanism. Adverse side-effects are the primary cause of antipsychotic drug discontinuation rather than poor efficacy. Using a novel method combining genetic and drug binding affinity data, we investigated evidence of causal mechanisms for 80 reported side-effects of 6 commonly prescribed antipsychotic drugs which together target 68 receptors. We analysed publicly available drug binding affinity data and genetic association data using Mendelian randomization and genetic colocalization to devise a representative 'score' for each combination of drug, side-effect, and receptor. We show that 36 side-effects are likely caused by drug action through 30 receptors, which are mainly attributable to off-target effects (26 off-target receptors underlying 39 side-effects). This method allowed us to distinguish which reported side-effects have evidence of causality. Of individual drugs, clozapine has the largest cumulative side-effect profile (Score = 57.5, SE = 11.2), and the largest number of side-effects (n = 36). We show that two well-known side-effects for clozapine, neutropenia and weight change, are underpinned by the action of GABA and CHRM3 receptors respectively. Our novel genetic approach can map side-effects to drugs and elucidate underlying mechanisms, which could potentially inform clinical practice, drug repurposing, and pharmacological development. Further, this method can be generalized to infer the on-target and off-target effects of drugs at any stage of the drug development pipeline.

抗精神病药物靶和脱靶副作用的遗传推断。
通常很难确定患者报告的副作用是否是由药物引起的,如果是,通过哪种机制引起的。不良副作用是导致抗精神病药物停药的主要原因,而不是疗效差。采用一种结合遗传和药物结合亲和力数据的新方法,我们研究了6种常用抗精神病药物80种副作用的因果机制证据,这些药物共同靶向68种受体。我们使用孟德尔随机化和基因共定位分析了公开可用的药物结合亲和力数据和遗传关联数据,为每种药物、副作用和受体组合设计了一个具有代表性的“评分”。我们发现36种副作用可能是由药物通过30种受体作用引起的,这主要归因于脱靶效应(26种脱靶受体导致39种副作用)。这种方法使我们能够区分哪些报告的副作用有因果关系的证据。在单个药物中,氯氮平具有最大的累积副作用(Score = 57.5, SE = 11.2)和最多的副作用(n = 36)。我们发现氯氮平的两个众所周知的副作用,中性粒细胞减少和体重变化,分别是由GABA和CHRM3受体的作用所支撑的。我们的新基因方法可以绘制药物的副作用并阐明潜在的机制,这可能为临床实践、药物再利用和药理学发展提供潜在的信息。此外,该方法可以推广到在药物开发管道的任何阶段推断药物的靶标和脱靶效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Genetics
PLoS Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
自引率
2.20%
发文量
438
期刊介绍: PLOS Genetics is run by an international Editorial Board, headed by the Editors-in-Chief, Greg Barsh (HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, and Stanford University School of Medicine) and Greg Copenhaver (The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). Articles published in PLOS Genetics are archived in PubMed Central and cited in PubMed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信