Effects of interventions with resistance exercises on muscle strength, physical disability, and quality of life in systemic sclerosis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
André Luiz Silveira Mallmann, Daniel Nóbrega de Moraes, Lucas Denardi Dória, Leonardo Peterson Dos Santos, Stephanie Pilotti, Mayra Angélica de Souza Antunes, Laura Fontana Steinmetz, Thauan Júnior Santos de Souza, Vanessa Hax, Jerri Luiz Ribeiro, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Rafael Mendonça da Silva Chakr
{"title":"Effects of interventions with resistance exercises on muscle strength, physical disability, and quality of life in systemic sclerosis patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.","authors":"André Luiz Silveira Mallmann, Daniel Nóbrega de Moraes, Lucas Denardi Dória, Leonardo Peterson Dos Santos, Stephanie Pilotti, Mayra Angélica de Souza Antunes, Laura Fontana Steinmetz, Thauan Júnior Santos de Souza, Vanessa Hax, Jerri Luiz Ribeiro, Ricardo Machado Xavier, Rafael Mendonça da Silva Chakr","doi":"10.1186/s42358-025-00468-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Systemic sclerosis (SSc) often leads to decreased muscle strength and mass, impairing physical performance and causing disability. Interventions with resistance exercise (RE) is an effective non-pharmacological approach to mitigate these issues. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of interventions with RE on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical performance, physical disability, and quality of life (QOL) in SSc patients, as well as to assess its adherence and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on a PICOS framework: Patient = Systemic Sclerosis; Intervention = Resistance exercise; Study design = Randomized clinical trials. Searches were performed across MEDLINE (PubMed), PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE up to January 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized clinical trials, including 422 participants (~85% female), were eligible for analysis. Participants' ages ranged from 42 to 64 years, with body mass indices between 22.5 and 28.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. The intervention period was standardized to 12 weeks. Interventions with RE significantly improved muscle strength (SMD = 2.76 kg; 95% CI, 1.32 to 4.20; p = 0.0002) and functional disability (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.00; p = 0.05) compared to controls. Interventions with RE also showed superiority in the physical component of QOL (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.81; p = 0.03). Although enhanced physical performance was observed, statistical pooling was not possible due to limited data. Interventions with RE had a low incidence of adverse events, but data on disease progression and adherence were insufficient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions with RE benefits muscle strength, physical function, and QOL in SSc patients, though optimal protocols and adherence strategies need further investigation. More robust studies are required to refine training methods and enhance clinical trial designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":"65 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00468-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) often leads to decreased muscle strength and mass, impairing physical performance and causing disability. Interventions with resistance exercise (RE) is an effective non-pharmacological approach to mitigate these issues. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of interventions with RE on muscle strength, muscle mass, physical performance, physical disability, and quality of life (QOL) in SSc patients, as well as to assess its adherence and safety.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted based on a PICOS framework: Patient = Systemic Sclerosis; Intervention = Resistance exercise; Study design = Randomized clinical trials. Searches were performed across MEDLINE (PubMed), PMC, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and EMBASE up to January 2025.

Results: Ten randomized clinical trials, including 422 participants (~85% female), were eligible for analysis. Participants' ages ranged from 42 to 64 years, with body mass indices between 22.5 and 28.0 kg/m2. The intervention period was standardized to 12 weeks. Interventions with RE significantly improved muscle strength (SMD = 2.76 kg; 95% CI, 1.32 to 4.20; p = 0.0002) and functional disability (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.00; p = 0.05) compared to controls. Interventions with RE also showed superiority in the physical component of QOL (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.81; p = 0.03). Although enhanced physical performance was observed, statistical pooling was not possible due to limited data. Interventions with RE had a low incidence of adverse events, but data on disease progression and adherence were insufficient.

Conclusion: Interventions with RE benefits muscle strength, physical function, and QOL in SSc patients, though optimal protocols and adherence strategies need further investigation. More robust studies are required to refine training methods and enhance clinical trial designs.

抗阻运动干预对系统性硬化症患者肌肉力量、身体残疾和生活质量的影响:一项荟萃分析的系统综述
系统性硬化症(SSc)经常导致肌肉力量和质量下降,损害身体机能并导致残疾。抗阻运动(RE)干预是缓解这些问题的有效的非药物方法。本系统综述旨在评估RE干预对SSc患者肌肉力量、肌肉质量、身体表现、身体残疾和生活质量(QOL)的影响,并评估其依从性和安全性。方法:基于PICOS框架进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:患者=系统性硬化症;干预=抗阻运动;研究设计=随机临床试验。检索通过MEDLINE (PubMed)、PMC、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、LILACS和EMBASE进行,截止到2025年1月。结果:10项随机临床试验纳入分析,包括422名受试者(女性约85%)。参与者年龄在42 - 64岁之间,体重指数在22.5 - 28.0 kg/m2之间。干预期标准化为12周。RE干预显著改善肌力(SMD = 2.76 kg;95% CI, 1.32 ~ 4.20;p = 0.0002)和功能障碍(SMD = -0.47;95% CI, -0.93 ~ -0.00;P = 0.05)。RE干预在生活质量的物理成分方面也有优势(SMD = 0.42;95% CI, 0.04 ~ 0.81;p = 0.03)。虽然观察到物理性能的提高,但由于数据有限,无法进行统计池化。RE干预的不良事件发生率较低,但关于疾病进展和依从性的数据不足。结论:RE干预有利于SSc患者的肌肉力量、身体功能和生活质量,但最佳方案和依从性策略有待进一步研究。需要更有力的研究来完善训练方法和加强临床试验设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信