{"title":"Temporal Trends in Patient Choice of Outpatient Care Provider Among Vietnam's Insured Rural Residents, 2006-2020.","authors":"Ardeshir Sepehri, Khac Nguyen Minh, Phuong Hung Vu, Thai Minh Pham","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much of the existing empirical literature on patient choice of medical care provider in low- and middle-income countries is cross sectional in nature. Comparatively little is known about the dynamic shifts in patient choice of provider, particular under transitions to universal health coverage. Using eight biennial waves of Vietnam's Household Living Standard Survey covering the period 2006-2020 and a multilevel multinomial logit model, this study examined temporal trends in patient choice of provider among the insured rural residents. Patient choice of provider shifted steadily from commune health centres (CHCs) towards public hospitals and private health facilities over the study period. Patients were 3.9 and 8.3 times, respectively, as likely to use higher-level government hospitals and private hospitals over CHCs in 2018-2020 than in 2006-2008, and 2.8-3 times as likely to use district hospitals or private clinics. The shifts were more pronounced for economically better-off patients than the less better-off patients. Relative to 2006-2008, patients in the top three expenditure quintiles were 5.4 times as likely to use higher-level government hospitals over CHCs for a medical treatment in 2018-2020 than patients in the bottom two expenditure quintiles, and by as much as 11.5 times as likely to use private hospitals. These findings call for systemic policy measures that would relocate the entry point to the health system from hospital outpatient departments to grassroots primary care services and to improve public and private hospital accountability as a way of ensuring equitable access to high-quality essential health care for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Much of the existing empirical literature on patient choice of medical care provider in low- and middle-income countries is cross sectional in nature. Comparatively little is known about the dynamic shifts in patient choice of provider, particular under transitions to universal health coverage. Using eight biennial waves of Vietnam's Household Living Standard Survey covering the period 2006-2020 and a multilevel multinomial logit model, this study examined temporal trends in patient choice of provider among the insured rural residents. Patient choice of provider shifted steadily from commune health centres (CHCs) towards public hospitals and private health facilities over the study period. Patients were 3.9 and 8.3 times, respectively, as likely to use higher-level government hospitals and private hospitals over CHCs in 2018-2020 than in 2006-2008, and 2.8-3 times as likely to use district hospitals or private clinics. The shifts were more pronounced for economically better-off patients than the less better-off patients. Relative to 2006-2008, patients in the top three expenditure quintiles were 5.4 times as likely to use higher-level government hospitals over CHCs for a medical treatment in 2018-2020 than patients in the bottom two expenditure quintiles, and by as much as 11.5 times as likely to use private hospitals. These findings call for systemic policy measures that would relocate the entry point to the health system from hospital outpatient departments to grassroots primary care services and to improve public and private hospital accountability as a way of ensuring equitable access to high-quality essential health care for all.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.