Temporal Trends in Patient Choice of Outpatient Care Provider Among Vietnam's Insured Rural Residents, 2006-2020.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ardeshir Sepehri, Khac Nguyen Minh, Phuong Hung Vu, Thai Minh Pham
{"title":"Temporal Trends in Patient Choice of Outpatient Care Provider Among Vietnam's Insured Rural Residents, 2006-2020.","authors":"Ardeshir Sepehri, Khac Nguyen Minh, Phuong Hung Vu, Thai Minh Pham","doi":"10.1002/hpm.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Much of the existing empirical literature on patient choice of medical care provider in low- and middle-income countries is cross sectional in nature. Comparatively little is known about the dynamic shifts in patient choice of provider, particular under transitions to universal health coverage. Using eight biennial waves of Vietnam's Household Living Standard Survey covering the period 2006-2020 and a multilevel multinomial logit model, this study examined temporal trends in patient choice of provider among the insured rural residents. Patient choice of provider shifted steadily from commune health centres (CHCs) towards public hospitals and private health facilities over the study period. Patients were 3.9 and 8.3 times, respectively, as likely to use higher-level government hospitals and private hospitals over CHCs in 2018-2020 than in 2006-2008, and 2.8-3 times as likely to use district hospitals or private clinics. The shifts were more pronounced for economically better-off patients than the less better-off patients. Relative to 2006-2008, patients in the top three expenditure quintiles were 5.4 times as likely to use higher-level government hospitals over CHCs for a medical treatment in 2018-2020 than patients in the bottom two expenditure quintiles, and by as much as 11.5 times as likely to use private hospitals. These findings call for systemic policy measures that would relocate the entry point to the health system from hospital outpatient departments to grassroots primary care services and to improve public and private hospital accountability as a way of ensuring equitable access to high-quality essential health care for all.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Much of the existing empirical literature on patient choice of medical care provider in low- and middle-income countries is cross sectional in nature. Comparatively little is known about the dynamic shifts in patient choice of provider, particular under transitions to universal health coverage. Using eight biennial waves of Vietnam's Household Living Standard Survey covering the period 2006-2020 and a multilevel multinomial logit model, this study examined temporal trends in patient choice of provider among the insured rural residents. Patient choice of provider shifted steadily from commune health centres (CHCs) towards public hospitals and private health facilities over the study period. Patients were 3.9 and 8.3 times, respectively, as likely to use higher-level government hospitals and private hospitals over CHCs in 2018-2020 than in 2006-2008, and 2.8-3 times as likely to use district hospitals or private clinics. The shifts were more pronounced for economically better-off patients than the less better-off patients. Relative to 2006-2008, patients in the top three expenditure quintiles were 5.4 times as likely to use higher-level government hospitals over CHCs for a medical treatment in 2018-2020 than patients in the bottom two expenditure quintiles, and by as much as 11.5 times as likely to use private hospitals. These findings call for systemic policy measures that would relocate the entry point to the health system from hospital outpatient departments to grassroots primary care services and to improve public and private hospital accountability as a way of ensuring equitable access to high-quality essential health care for all.

2006-2020年越南参保农村居民门诊服务提供者选择的时间趋势
许多现有的关于低收入和中等收入国家患者选择医疗服务提供者的实证文献本质上是横断面的。相对而言,人们对患者选择提供者的动态变化知之甚少,特别是在向全民健康覆盖过渡的过程中。本研究利用越南家庭生活水平调查的八次两年一次的浪潮,涵盖2006-2020年,并采用多层次多项logit模型,研究了参保农村居民中患者选择提供者的时间趋势。在研究期间,患者对提供者的选择从社区卫生中心(CHCs)稳步转向公立医院和私立卫生设施。2018-2020年,患者使用上级政府医院和私立医院的可能性分别是2006-2008年的3.9倍和8.3倍,使用区级医院或私立诊所的可能性是2006-2008年的2.8-3倍。在经济条件较好的患者中,这种变化比经济条件较差的患者更为明显。与2006-2008年相比,2018-2020年,支出最高的三个五分之一的患者使用更高级别政府医院的可能性是支出最低的两个五分之一的患者的5.4倍,使用私立医院的可能性高达11.5倍。这些发现要求采取系统的政策措施,将卫生系统的切入点从医院门诊部转移到基层初级保健服务,并改善公立和私立医院的问责制,以确保所有人公平获得高质量的基本卫生保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信