Screening of the thoracolumbar spine is almost completely absent in trials evaluating conservative management for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review of 43 randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Matthew R Schumacher, Dillan T Kovash, Keith T Forkin, Dylann B Bylund
{"title":"Screening of the thoracolumbar spine is almost completely absent in trials evaluating conservative management for sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review of 43 randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Matthew R Schumacher, Dillan T Kovash, Keith T Forkin, Dylann B Bylund","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2025.2539783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common diagnosed lumbosacral condition with historical diagnostic uncertainty. Recent literature suggests that effective diagnosis of SIJ pain should begin with screening the thoracolumbar spine, as SIJ regional pain is often linked to referral patterns originating from this area.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the screening methods of the thoracolumbar spine in randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the evaluation and treatment of SIJ pain or dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL was conducted for RCTs published from inception up to 31 March 2024. RCTs focusing on SIJ pain as the primary diagnosis, treated with conservative interventions such as manual therapy, exercise, or modalities in adult patients, were included. Data on thoracolumbar spine screening methods were extracted, categorized, and reported with means, standard deviations, and frequency counts. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess each RCT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,719 articles were retrieved. After removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 43 RCTs were included for data extraction. Two trials (4.7%) performed a reasonable thoracolumbar spine screening process, nine (20.9%) partially completed, and 32 (74.4%) did not perform a thoracolumbar screening process prior to formulating an SIJ diagnosis. Every RCT had at least some of risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>More than 95% of RCT's reported minimal-to-no thoracolumbar screening process prior to developing an SIJ diagnosis, highlighting significant variability and scarcity. The role of screening the thoracolumbar spine prior to diagnosing SIJ pain is notably underrepresented in RCTs providing treatment recommendations for this condition, undermining the strength of the conclusions derived from these studies. This finding highlights the need for further research to establish a standardized clinical thoracolumbar screening process for SIJ pain to ultimately improve patient outcomes for this condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2025.2539783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is a common diagnosed lumbosacral condition with historical diagnostic uncertainty. Recent literature suggests that effective diagnosis of SIJ pain should begin with screening the thoracolumbar spine, as SIJ regional pain is often linked to referral patterns originating from this area.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the screening methods of the thoracolumbar spine in randomized controlled trials (RCT) for the evaluation and treatment of SIJ pain or dysfunction.

Methods: A search of PubMed, CINAHL, and CENTRAL was conducted for RCTs published from inception up to 31 March 2024. RCTs focusing on SIJ pain as the primary diagnosis, treated with conservative interventions such as manual therapy, exercise, or modalities in adult patients, were included. Data on thoracolumbar spine screening methods were extracted, categorized, and reported with means, standard deviations, and frequency counts. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess each RCT.

Results: A total of 2,719 articles were retrieved. After removing duplicates and screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 43 RCTs were included for data extraction. Two trials (4.7%) performed a reasonable thoracolumbar spine screening process, nine (20.9%) partially completed, and 32 (74.4%) did not perform a thoracolumbar screening process prior to formulating an SIJ diagnosis. Every RCT had at least some of risk of bias.

Discussion/conclusion: More than 95% of RCT's reported minimal-to-no thoracolumbar screening process prior to developing an SIJ diagnosis, highlighting significant variability and scarcity. The role of screening the thoracolumbar spine prior to diagnosing SIJ pain is notably underrepresented in RCTs providing treatment recommendations for this condition, undermining the strength of the conclusions derived from these studies. This finding highlights the need for further research to establish a standardized clinical thoracolumbar screening process for SIJ pain to ultimately improve patient outcomes for this condition.

在评估骶髂关节疼痛保守治疗的试验中,胸腰椎的筛查几乎完全缺失:一项对43项随机对照试验的系统回顾。
背景:骶髂关节(SIJ)疼痛是一种常见的腰骶疾病,历史诊断不确定。最近的文献表明,SIJ疼痛的有效诊断应该从筛查胸腰椎开始,因为SIJ区域性疼痛通常与起源于该区域的转诊模式有关。目的:本系统综述的目的是评价随机对照试验(RCT)中评估和治疗SIJ疼痛或功能障碍的胸腰椎筛查方法。方法:检索PubMed、CINAHL和CENTRAL,检索从开始到2024年3月31日发表的rct。纳入了以SIJ疼痛为主要诊断的随机对照试验,成年患者采用保守干预措施,如手工治疗、运动或模式治疗。对胸腰椎筛查方法的数据进行提取、分类,并以平均值、标准差和频率计数进行报告。采用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具对每个RCT进行评估。结果:共检索到2719篇文献。在去除重复、筛选标题、摘要和全文后,纳入43项随机对照试验进行数据提取。2项试验(4.7%)进行了合理的胸腰椎筛查,9项试验(20.9%)部分完成,32项试验(74.4%)在制定SIJ诊断之前没有进行胸腰椎筛查。每个随机对照试验都至少有一定的偏倚风险。讨论/结论:超过95%的RCT报告在诊断SIJ之前很少或没有进行胸腰椎筛查,突出了显著的可变性和稀缺性。在为SIJ疼痛提供治疗建议的随机对照试验中,在诊断前筛查胸腰椎的作用明显不足,这削弱了这些研究得出的结论的强度。这一发现强调需要进一步研究建立一个标准化的SIJ疼痛临床胸腰椎筛查过程,以最终改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信