Association of low knowledge about cardiovascular disease and lack of lifestyle changes after the COVID-19 pandemic with higher cardiovascular risk in Peruvian residents.
IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Arfaxad M Barreto-Vega, Brandon M Gaytán-Caycho, Edda E Newball-Noriega, Salomon Huancahuire-Vega
{"title":"Association of low knowledge about cardiovascular disease and lack of lifestyle changes after the COVID-19 pandemic with higher cardiovascular risk in Peruvian residents.","authors":"Arfaxad M Barreto-Vega, Brandon M Gaytán-Caycho, Edda E Newball-Noriega, Salomon Huancahuire-Vega","doi":"10.1177/22799036251358296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the association between low knowledge about cardiovascular disease, the absence of lifestyle changes after the COVID-19 pandemic, and cardiovascular risk among Peruvian resident.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Analytical and cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 371 participants. The Knowledge about Cardiovascular Diseases questionnaire, the Pocket Guide for estimating and managing cardiovascular risk, and the Changes in lifestyle during the quarantine period scale were used. Moreover, to establish independent associations of the variables of interest, the PRc and PRa of each factor were determined through Poisson regression models with robust variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 60.4% of participants had changes in lifestyle after the pandemic, 69.8% had a low level of knowledge about the risk of cardiovascular disease, and 18.6% had a moderate-high cardiovascular risk. The bivariate analysis found that the population that did not change their lifestyles after the pandemic had a significantly higher cardiovascular risk than those who did make changes. Likewise, low knowledge about cardiovascular risk and disease was associated with a higher level of cardiovascular risk. The multivariate model showed that participants who did not have changes in lifestyle after the pandemic were 3.34 times more likely to have a higher level of cardiovascular risk (95% CI 2.09-5.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents who did not have changes in lifestyle after the COVID-19 pandemic and expressed low knowledge about cardiovascular disease have a higher cardiovascular risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"22799036251358296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036251358296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the association between low knowledge about cardiovascular disease, the absence of lifestyle changes after the COVID-19 pandemic, and cardiovascular risk among Peruvian resident.
Design and methods: Analytical and cross-sectional study. The sample consisted of 371 participants. The Knowledge about Cardiovascular Diseases questionnaire, the Pocket Guide for estimating and managing cardiovascular risk, and the Changes in lifestyle during the quarantine period scale were used. Moreover, to establish independent associations of the variables of interest, the PRc and PRa of each factor were determined through Poisson regression models with robust variance.
Results: About 60.4% of participants had changes in lifestyle after the pandemic, 69.8% had a low level of knowledge about the risk of cardiovascular disease, and 18.6% had a moderate-high cardiovascular risk. The bivariate analysis found that the population that did not change their lifestyles after the pandemic had a significantly higher cardiovascular risk than those who did make changes. Likewise, low knowledge about cardiovascular risk and disease was associated with a higher level of cardiovascular risk. The multivariate model showed that participants who did not have changes in lifestyle after the pandemic were 3.34 times more likely to have a higher level of cardiovascular risk (95% CI 2.09-5.34).
Conclusions: Residents who did not have changes in lifestyle after the COVID-19 pandemic and expressed low knowledge about cardiovascular disease have a higher cardiovascular risk.
背景:心血管疾病(CVD)是世界范围内死亡率和伤残调整生命年(DALYs)的主要原因。本研究旨在评估秘鲁居民心血管疾病知识不足、COVID-19大流行后没有改变生活方式与心血管风险之间的关系。设计和方法:分析和横断面研究。样本包括371名参与者。采用《心血管疾病知识调查表》、《心血管风险评估与管理袖珍指南》和《隔离期生活方式变化量表》。此外,为了建立感兴趣变量的独立关联,通过具有稳健方差的泊松回归模型确定每个因素的PRc和PRa。结果:约60.4%的参与者在大流行后生活方式发生了变化,69.8%的参与者对心血管疾病风险的认识水平较低,18.6%的参与者对心血管疾病的风险有中高认识。双变量分析发现,大流行后没有改变生活方式的人群患心血管疾病的风险明显高于改变生活方式的人群。同样,对心血管风险和疾病的了解不足与心血管风险水平较高有关。多变量模型显示,大流行后没有改变生活方式的参与者患心血管疾病的风险是其他参与者的3.34倍(95% CI 2.09-5.34)。结论:新冠肺炎大流行后生活方式未发生改变、心血管疾病知识水平较低的居民发生心血管疾病的风险较高。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.