Clinical Evaluation and Epidemiologic Application of an Adenoviral Species-Typing Model, based on Syndromic PCR Melt-Curve Data.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jay D Jones, Benjamin W Galvin, Brooklyn A Noble, Varvara Probst, James D Chappell, Andrew J Spieker, Natasha B Halasa, Thomas C Robbins, Jonathan E Schmitz
{"title":"Clinical Evaluation and Epidemiologic Application of an Adenoviral Species-Typing Model, based on Syndromic PCR Melt-Curve Data.","authors":"Jay D Jones, Benjamin W Galvin, Brooklyn A Noble, Varvara Probst, James D Chappell, Andrew J Spieker, Natasha B Halasa, Thomas C Robbins, Jonathan E Schmitz","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human adenoviruses (HAdV) elicit diverse infections, most notably within the respiratory tract. While HAdV is a target in clinical-use PCR assays to diagnose respiratory infections, techniques are not widely available to determine individual HAdV species within clinical specimens. An initial model was previously developed to predict HAdV species from BIOFIRE® Respiratory Pathogen Panels (RPP), evaluated in silico and through contrived specimens. This model was based on melt-curve data of 5 individual amplification reactions underlying the adenoviral result.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, the initial model is updated to better reflect prior knowledge of HAdV respiratory epidemiology and applied to a dataset of clinical HAdV-detected RPP samples independently subtyped via PCR. Revised model performance was further assessed through application to clinical proficiency testing events in the BIOFIRE Syndromic Trends database (Trends), a near-real-time network of clinical-use BIOFIRE testing results. The revised model was applied to >100 000 HAdV-detected results in Trends from the United States since 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the independently typed specimens, the revised model accuracy was 95.2% (180/189): 79/82 for HAdV-B, 97/102 for HAdV-C, and 4/5 for HAdV-E. In the Trends dataset, these analyses indicated dynamic epidemiology for HAdV species, including a shift of B-vs-C prevalence at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has more recently returned to prepandemic ratios, along with low-level prediction of species less typically associated with respiratory infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In silico modeling of melt-curve data from the BIOFIRE RPP can enhance HAdV species surveillance efforts and define viral epidemiology at local, regional, and national levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1176-1187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human adenoviruses (HAdV) elicit diverse infections, most notably within the respiratory tract. While HAdV is a target in clinical-use PCR assays to diagnose respiratory infections, techniques are not widely available to determine individual HAdV species within clinical specimens. An initial model was previously developed to predict HAdV species from BIOFIRE® Respiratory Pathogen Panels (RPP), evaluated in silico and through contrived specimens. This model was based on melt-curve data of 5 individual amplification reactions underlying the adenoviral result.

Methods: In this study, the initial model is updated to better reflect prior knowledge of HAdV respiratory epidemiology and applied to a dataset of clinical HAdV-detected RPP samples independently subtyped via PCR. Revised model performance was further assessed through application to clinical proficiency testing events in the BIOFIRE Syndromic Trends database (Trends), a near-real-time network of clinical-use BIOFIRE testing results. The revised model was applied to >100 000 HAdV-detected results in Trends from the United States since 2019.

Results: Among the independently typed specimens, the revised model accuracy was 95.2% (180/189): 79/82 for HAdV-B, 97/102 for HAdV-C, and 4/5 for HAdV-E. In the Trends dataset, these analyses indicated dynamic epidemiology for HAdV species, including a shift of B-vs-C prevalence at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has more recently returned to prepandemic ratios, along with low-level prediction of species less typically associated with respiratory infection.

Conclusion: In silico modeling of melt-curve data from the BIOFIRE RPP can enhance HAdV species surveillance efforts and define viral epidemiology at local, regional, and national levels.

基于证候PCR熔融曲线数据的腺病毒分型模型的临床评价及流行病学应用。
背景:人类腺病毒(hav)引起多种感染,最明显的是呼吸道感染。虽然hav是临床应用PCR检测诊断呼吸道感染的靶标,但在临床标本中确定单个hav种类的技术并不广泛。先前开发了一个初始模型,用于预测来自BIOFIRE®呼吸道病原体面板(RPP)的hav物种,并通过计算机和人造标本进行评估。该模型基于腺病毒结果下5个单独扩增反应的熔融曲线数据。方法:在本研究中,为了更好地反映hav呼吸道流行病学的先验知识,对初始模型进行了更新,并将其应用于通过PCR独立分型的临床hav检测RPP样本数据集。修订后的模型性能通过应用于BIOFIRE综合征趋势数据库(Trends)中的临床熟练度测试事件进一步评估,该数据库是临床使用BIOFIRE测试结果的近实时网络。自2019年以来,修订后的模型应用于美国趋势中100万hadv检测结果。结果:在独立分型标本中,修正模型准确率为95.2% (180/189):HAdV-B为79/82,HAdV-C为97/102,HAdV-E为4/5。在Trends数据集中,这些分析表明了hav物种的动态流行病学,包括在COVID-19大流行开始时B-vs-C流行率的转变,最近已恢复到大流行前的比例,以及与呼吸道感染不太相关的物种的低水平预测。结论:利用BIOFIRE RPP的融化曲线数据进行计算机建模可以加强hav物种监测工作,并在地方、区域和国家层面定义病毒流行病学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信