Facilitators and Barriers to Mental Health Leaves and Return to Work Among Canadian Teachers.

IF 1.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kristen Ferguson, Melissa Corrente, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Mental Health Leaves and Return to Work Among Canadian Teachers.","authors":"Kristen Ferguson, Melissa Corrente, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault","doi":"10.1177/10482911251362471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In our qualitative study, we interviewed 45 Canadian teachers about mental health issues, taking a leave of absence, and their subsequent return to work. We found that doctors, supportive principals, supportive colleagues, supportive human resource departments, supportive school boards, and the teaching unions were facilitators for taking a leave, while stigma, unsupportive administration, preparation, and the process of taking a leave were barriers. In returning to work, principals and administrators, and preparation to return were cited as barriers, while colleagues, principals and administrators, doctors, unions and a change in work were facilitators. We interpret these findings through a synthesized framework combining Allegro and Veerman's theory of sickness absence and D'Amato and Zijsrtra's theory of work resumption, highlighting individual, organizational, and societal factors shaping leave and return decisions. With the high cost of teacher absences and critical staffing shortages, we discuss the impacts of these facilitators and barriers and make recommendations for practice for a healthy teaching workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":45586,"journal":{"name":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","volume":" ","pages":"316-325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441210/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Solutions-A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10482911251362471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our qualitative study, we interviewed 45 Canadian teachers about mental health issues, taking a leave of absence, and their subsequent return to work. We found that doctors, supportive principals, supportive colleagues, supportive human resource departments, supportive school boards, and the teaching unions were facilitators for taking a leave, while stigma, unsupportive administration, preparation, and the process of taking a leave were barriers. In returning to work, principals and administrators, and preparation to return were cited as barriers, while colleagues, principals and administrators, doctors, unions and a change in work were facilitators. We interpret these findings through a synthesized framework combining Allegro and Veerman's theory of sickness absence and D'Amato and Zijsrtra's theory of work resumption, highlighting individual, organizational, and societal factors shaping leave and return decisions. With the high cost of teacher absences and critical staffing shortages, we discuss the impacts of these facilitators and barriers and make recommendations for practice for a healthy teaching workforce.

加拿大教师中心理健康休假和重返工作岗位的促进因素和障碍。
在我们的定性研究中,我们采访了45名加拿大教师关于心理健康问题、休假以及随后重返工作岗位的问题。我们发现医生、支持的校长、支持的同事、支持的人力资源部门、支持的学校董事会和教师工会是休假的推手,而污名、不支持的管理、准备和休假的过程是障碍。在重返工作中,校长和管理人员以及重返工作的准备被认为是障碍,而同事、校长和管理人员、医生、工会和工作变化是促进因素。我们将Allegro和Veerman的病假缺勤理论与D’amato和Zijsrtra的复工理论结合起来,通过一个综合框架来解释这些发现,强调了影响休假和回归决策的个人、组织和社会因素。由于教师缺勤的高成本和严重的人员短缺,我们讨论了这些促进因素和障碍的影响,并为健康的教师队伍提出了实践建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: New Solutions delivers authoritative responses to perplexing problems, with a worker’s voice, an activist’s commitment, a scientist’s approach, and a policy-maker’s experience. New Solutions explores the growing, changing common ground at the intersection of health, work, and the environment. The Journal makes plain how the issues in each area are interrelated and sets forth progressive, thoughtfully crafted public policy choices. It seeks a conversation on the issues between the grassroots labor and environmental activists and the professionals and researchers involved in charting society’s way forward with the understanding that lack of scientific knowledge is no excuse for doing nothing and that inaction is itself a choice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信