Peer-Led Neonatal Resuscitation Training: Experience of Kairuki University.

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Raidah R Gangji, Leonard Malasa, Gambuna D Koya, Aliasgar Khaki, Felician Rutachunzibwa, Maulidi Fataki, Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Esther M Johnston, Esther Mwaikambo
{"title":"Peer-Led Neonatal Resuscitation Training: Experience of Kairuki University.","authors":"Raidah R Gangji, Leonard Malasa, Gambuna D Koya, Aliasgar Khaki, Felician Rutachunzibwa, Maulidi Fataki, Florence Salvatory Kalabamu, Esther M Johnston, Esther Mwaikambo","doi":"10.1177/23821205251358037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neonatal mortality remains a significant public health concern in Tanzania, with birth asphyxia being one of the leading causes. The Helping Babies Breathe program aims to equip providers with essential neonatal resuscitation skills, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess and document the effectiveness of a peer-led training program on knowledge and confidence in neonatal resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Helping Babies Breathe-Kairuki University (HBB-KU) initiative; a student-led program including both theoretical and practical components attended by future and current healthcare professionals (HCPs). Pre- and post-training knowledge tests assessing knowledge and understanding, and self-evaluation tests reporting self-confidence were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Test results of participants from 2016 to 2023 were analyzed using the paired <i>t</i>-test. HBB-KU initiative successfully trained 1389 trainees. A total of 1243 (93.11%) included medical, nursing, and other health-allied science students. Pre (10.63 ± 2.53) and post (14.71 ± 1.60) training knowledge test scores demonstrated statistically significant (<i>P</i> < .01) improvements. Confidence prior to training, 213 (15.97%) participants reported feeling \"very confident\"; however, following training, an increase was noted, reaching 784 (58.72%) participants feeling \"very confident,\" demonstrating a difference of 42.75%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate HBB-KU peer-led training initiative is effective in mitigating knowledge gaps and developing confidence around neonatal resuscitation among participants. Given the resource-limited setting, this accomplishment provides a context for a replicable model where students can teach and train peers, and practicing HCPs may be an efficient method to expand neonatal care in similar circumstances, globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251358037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290356/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251358037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality remains a significant public health concern in Tanzania, with birth asphyxia being one of the leading causes. The Helping Babies Breathe program aims to equip providers with essential neonatal resuscitation skills, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Objective: To assess and document the effectiveness of a peer-led training program on knowledge and confidence in neonatal resuscitation.

Methods: Helping Babies Breathe-Kairuki University (HBB-KU) initiative; a student-led program including both theoretical and practical components attended by future and current healthcare professionals (HCPs). Pre- and post-training knowledge tests assessing knowledge and understanding, and self-evaluation tests reporting self-confidence were administered.

Results: Test results of participants from 2016 to 2023 were analyzed using the paired t-test. HBB-KU initiative successfully trained 1389 trainees. A total of 1243 (93.11%) included medical, nursing, and other health-allied science students. Pre (10.63 ± 2.53) and post (14.71 ± 1.60) training knowledge test scores demonstrated statistically significant (P < .01) improvements. Confidence prior to training, 213 (15.97%) participants reported feeling "very confident"; however, following training, an increase was noted, reaching 784 (58.72%) participants feeling "very confident," demonstrating a difference of 42.75%.

Conclusion: The results indicate HBB-KU peer-led training initiative is effective in mitigating knowledge gaps and developing confidence around neonatal resuscitation among participants. Given the resource-limited setting, this accomplishment provides a context for a replicable model where students can teach and train peers, and practicing HCPs may be an efficient method to expand neonatal care in similar circumstances, globally.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

同行领导的新生儿复苏训练:航空大学的经验。
背景:在坦桑尼亚,新生儿死亡率仍然是一个重大的公共卫生问题,出生窒息是主要原因之一。“帮助婴儿呼吸”项目旨在为医疗服务提供者提供必要的新生儿复苏技能,特别是在资源有限的情况下。目的:评估和记录同行领导的新生儿复苏知识和信心培训计划的有效性。方法:“帮助宝宝呼吸”-启路大学(HBB-KU)倡议;一个以学生为主导的项目,包括理论和实践部分,由未来和现在的医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)参加。训练前和训练后的知识测试评估知识和理解,自我评价测试报告自信。结果:2016 - 2023年参与者的检验结果采用配对t检验进行分析。哈佛大学-堪萨斯大学合作计划成功培训学员1389人。共有1243名(93.11%)包括医学、护理和其他与健康相关的理科学生。培训前(10.63±2.53)分和培训后(14.71±1.60)分具有统计学意义(P)。结论:HBB-KU同伴主导的培训计划可有效缓解参与者对新生儿复苏的知识差距和建立信心。鉴于资源有限的环境,这一成就为学生可以教授和培训同行的可复制模式提供了背景,并且实践hcp可能是在全球类似情况下扩大新生儿护理的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信