Exploring Factors That Drive Nonurgent Emergency Department Use.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251362529
Carina Mireles-Romo, Eddie Hernandez, Isabella Choi, Jennifer Roh, Soheil Saadat, Shannon Toohey
{"title":"Exploring Factors That Drive Nonurgent Emergency Department Use.","authors":"Carina Mireles-Romo, Eddie Hernandez, Isabella Choi, Jennifer Roh, Soheil Saadat, Shannon Toohey","doi":"10.1177/23743735251362529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits continue to rise despite efforts to reduce ED overcrowding. This study aimed to explore factors influencing ED utilization and perceptions of alternative healthcare services among patients of nonurgent ED visits. Conducted at an academic, level-1 trauma center, the study identified nonurgent visits using the emergency severity index 5-level triage acuity scale and utilized a 3-part qualitative survey to gather data on demographics, reasons for ED visits, and perceptions of the ED, primary care physicians (PCPs), and urgent care centers (UCCs). Survey responses from 586 patients were analyzed, demonstrating common themes such as ED accessibility, physician qualifications, and the need for diagnostic testing. Although participants generally expressed satisfaction with PCPs and UCCs, the frequency of nonurgent ED visits remained high. The study suggests that many nonurgent cases could have been managed using alternative healthcare services; additionally, the findings align with existing literature and support the need for enhanced patient education on appropriate ED use and the benefits of utilizing alternative healthcare options.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251362529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251362529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonurgent emergency department (ED) visits continue to rise despite efforts to reduce ED overcrowding. This study aimed to explore factors influencing ED utilization and perceptions of alternative healthcare services among patients of nonurgent ED visits. Conducted at an academic, level-1 trauma center, the study identified nonurgent visits using the emergency severity index 5-level triage acuity scale and utilized a 3-part qualitative survey to gather data on demographics, reasons for ED visits, and perceptions of the ED, primary care physicians (PCPs), and urgent care centers (UCCs). Survey responses from 586 patients were analyzed, demonstrating common themes such as ED accessibility, physician qualifications, and the need for diagnostic testing. Although participants generally expressed satisfaction with PCPs and UCCs, the frequency of nonurgent ED visits remained high. The study suggests that many nonurgent cases could have been managed using alternative healthcare services; additionally, the findings align with existing literature and support the need for enhanced patient education on appropriate ED use and the benefits of utilizing alternative healthcare options.

探索推动非紧急急诊科使用的因素。
非紧急急诊科(ED)的访问量继续上升,尽管努力减少ED过度拥挤。本研究旨在探讨非紧急急诊科患者使用急诊科及对替代医疗服务的认知的影响因素。该研究在一个学术一级创伤中心进行,使用紧急严重程度指数5级分诊灵敏度量表确定非紧急就诊,并利用3部分定性调查收集人口统计数据,急诊科就诊原因,以及对急诊科、初级保健医生(pcp)和紧急护理中心(UCCs)的看法。对586名患者的调查反馈进行了分析,展示了诸如急诊科无障碍、医生资格和诊断测试需求等共同主题。虽然参与者普遍对pcp和UCCs表示满意,但非紧急急诊科就诊的频率仍然很高。该研究表明,许多非紧急病例本可以通过其他医疗服务进行管理;此外,研究结果与现有文献一致,并支持加强患者关于适当使用ED的教育和利用替代医疗选择的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信