Cancer screening adherence among e-cigarette users in the United States.

IF 2.2 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/207098
Areesh Mevawalla, Mujtaba Khalil, Zayed Rashid, Abdullah Altaf, Azza Sarfraz, Timothy M Pawlik
{"title":"Cancer screening adherence among e-cigarette users in the United States.","authors":"Areesh Mevawalla, Mujtaba Khalil, Zayed Rashid, Abdullah Altaf, Azza Sarfraz, Timothy M Pawlik","doi":"10.18332/tpc/207098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tobacco use patterns have dramatically shifted, with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) rapidly increasing in popularity despite uncertainty about their health impacts. This study examines adherence to preventive cancer screening guidelines among cigarette smokers, e-cigarette users, and non-smokers, addressing a critical gap in understanding how tobacco use influences engagement in preventive healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 445132 adult respondents were queried from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Analytic samples were restricted to age- and sex-eligible sub-cohorts for each cancer type, therefore including adults 50-75 years, women 50-74 years, and women 21-65 years for colon, breast and cervical screening, respectively. Within these analytic samples, we assessed the association between socioeconomic characteristics, smoking status, and screening adherence using weighted logistic regression, adjusted for relevant factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening adherence was lowest among cigarette smokers, intermediate among e-cigarette users, and highest among non-smokers. Compared to non-smokers, cigarette smokers had significantly lower odds of adhering to colorectal (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.81), breast (AOR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.52-0.61), and cervical cancer screening (AOR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.62-0.72). E-cigarette users also showed reduced adherence to colorectal (AOR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-0.95) and breast cancer screening (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.81) but not cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-cigarette users exhibited suboptimal adherence to recommended cancer screenings, suggesting that perceptions of reduced risk associated with vaping do not translate into improved preventive healthcare behaviors. Targeted public health initiatives addressing risk misconceptions and healthcare access barriers are necessary to improve screening rates among all tobacco users.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290923/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/207098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco use patterns have dramatically shifted, with electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) rapidly increasing in popularity despite uncertainty about their health impacts. This study examines adherence to preventive cancer screening guidelines among cigarette smokers, e-cigarette users, and non-smokers, addressing a critical gap in understanding how tobacco use influences engagement in preventive healthcare.

Methods: A total of 445132 adult respondents were queried from the 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Analytic samples were restricted to age- and sex-eligible sub-cohorts for each cancer type, therefore including adults 50-75 years, women 50-74 years, and women 21-65 years for colon, breast and cervical screening, respectively. Within these analytic samples, we assessed the association between socioeconomic characteristics, smoking status, and screening adherence using weighted logistic regression, adjusted for relevant factors.

Results: Screening adherence was lowest among cigarette smokers, intermediate among e-cigarette users, and highest among non-smokers. Compared to non-smokers, cigarette smokers had significantly lower odds of adhering to colorectal (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.58-0.81), breast (AOR=0.57; 95% CI: 0.52-0.61), and cervical cancer screening (AOR=0.67; 95% CI: 0.62-0.72). E-cigarette users also showed reduced adherence to colorectal (AOR=0.90; 95% CI: 0.81-0.95) and breast cancer screening (AOR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.81) but not cervical cancer screening.

Conclusions: E-cigarette users exhibited suboptimal adherence to recommended cancer screenings, suggesting that perceptions of reduced risk associated with vaping do not translate into improved preventive healthcare behaviors. Targeted public health initiatives addressing risk misconceptions and healthcare access barriers are necessary to improve screening rates among all tobacco users.

美国电子烟使用者的癌症筛查依从性
导言:烟草使用模式发生了巨大变化,尽管对其健康影响尚不确定,但电子烟(电子烟)的普及程度迅速提高。本研究调查了吸烟者、电子烟使用者和非吸烟者对预防性癌症筛查指南的遵守情况,解决了在理解烟草使用如何影响预防性医疗保健参与方面的一个关键空白。方法:从2022年行为危险因素监测系统(Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System)数据中,对445132名成人进行问卷调查。分析样本仅限于每种癌症类型的年龄和性别符合条件的亚队列,因此分别包括50-75岁的成年人、50-74岁的女性和21-65岁的女性进行结肠、乳房和宫颈筛查。在这些分析样本中,我们使用加权逻辑回归评估了社会经济特征、吸烟状况和筛查依从性之间的关系,并对相关因素进行了调整。结果:筛查依从性在吸烟者中最低,在电子烟使用者中居中,在非吸烟者中最高。与不吸烟者相比,吸烟者坚持结肠直肠癌的几率明显较低(AOR=0.75;95% CI: 0.58-0.81),乳腺(AOR=0.57;95% CI: 0.52-0.61)和宫颈癌筛查(AOR=0.67;95% ci: 0.62-0.72)。电子烟使用者也显示结肠直肠癌的依从性降低(AOR=0.90;95% CI: 0.81-0.95)和乳腺癌筛查(AOR=0.75;95% CI: 0.70-0.81),但不包括宫颈癌筛查。结论:电子烟使用者对推荐的癌症筛查的依从性表现不佳,这表明与电子烟相关的风险降低的观念并没有转化为改善的预防性医疗保健行为。要提高所有烟草使用者的筛查率,必须采取有针对性的公共卫生举措,消除风险误解和获得保健服务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信