Estimating Bone Metastasis Risk in Prostate Cancer: A Three-Parameter Model Using Bone Sialoprotein, ISUP Grading, and Tumor Progression.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Christos Philippou, Simon Gloger, Burkhard Ubrig, Norman Bitterlich, Emilia Krassimirova Naseva, Hans-Joerg Sommerfeld, Andreas Wiedemann, Dirk Theegarten, Haji Abdulla, Stathis Philippou
{"title":"Estimating Bone Metastasis Risk in Prostate Cancer: A Three-Parameter Model Using Bone Sialoprotein, ISUP Grading, and Tumor Progression.","authors":"Christos Philippou, Simon Gloger, Burkhard Ubrig, Norman Bitterlich, Emilia Krassimirova Naseva, Hans-Joerg Sommerfeld, Andreas Wiedemann, Dirk Theegarten, Haji Abdulla, Stathis Philippou","doi":"10.1159/000547556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osseous metastasis is the most common site of distant spread in prostate cancer. Several factors contribute to predicting bone metastasis, including elevated PSA levels, short PSA doubling time, advanced ISUP grading, local tumor progression, and novel biomarkers. However, no clinical scoring system currently exists to assess bone metastasis risk at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, no study has investigated the correlation between predictive factors and bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression in the primary tumor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate BSP expression in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Data from 673 patients were analyzed over a 7-9 year follow-up period to assess the development of bone metastases. BSP expression was also evaluated in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, BSP expression was analyzed alongside established risk factors using multivariate logistic regression to determine their combined predictive value for bone metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bone metastases developed in 12.5% (84/673) of patients. BSP expression was negative (0-5%) in 23.8% of cases, while 22.2% exhibited high expression (>40%). Patients with bone metastases had significantly higher BSP expression than those without (55.5 ± 19.7% vs. 25.7 ± 24.9%; p < 0.001). In contrast, 97% of patients without prostate carcinoma had BSP values below 5%. Among metastatic patients: 82.9% had BSP expression of at least 40%, and none had values below 20%. As a single predictive parameter, BSP showed a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 81.6%. However, using multivariate analysis, a three-parameter scoring model integrating BSP expression, ISUP grading, and the number of affected core needle biopsies achieved 88.6% sensitivity and 81.1% specificity for predicting bone metastases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BSP expression serves as a potential indicator for bone metastasis development but lacks sufficient sensitivity as a standalone clinical marker. Similarly, local tumor progression and histopathologic grading (ISUP) fail as single predictors. However, integrating BSP expression with established risk factors significantly enhances predictive accuracy. Given that all three parameters are derived from routine histopathological analysis, BSP immunohistochemistry should be considered for integration into clinical practice for early risk stratification in prostate cancer patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Osseous metastasis is the most common site of distant spread in prostate cancer. Several factors contribute to predicting bone metastasis, including elevated PSA levels, short PSA doubling time, advanced ISUP grading, local tumor progression, and novel biomarkers. However, no clinical scoring system currently exists to assess bone metastasis risk at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, no study has investigated the correlation between predictive factors and bone sialoprotein (BSP) expression in the primary tumor.

Methods: Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate BSP expression in transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies from prostate cancer patients. Data from 673 patients were analyzed over a 7-9 year follow-up period to assess the development of bone metastases. BSP expression was also evaluated in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Additionally, BSP expression was analyzed alongside established risk factors using multivariate logistic regression to determine their combined predictive value for bone metastasis.

Results: Bone metastases developed in 12.5% (84/673) of patients. BSP expression was negative (0-5%) in 23.8% of cases, while 22.2% exhibited high expression (>40%). Patients with bone metastases had significantly higher BSP expression than those without (55.5 ± 19.7% vs. 25.7 ± 24.9%; p < 0.001). In contrast, 97% of patients without prostate carcinoma had BSP values below 5%. Among metastatic patients: 82.9% had BSP expression of at least 40%, and none had values below 20%. As a single predictive parameter, BSP showed a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 81.6%. However, using multivariate analysis, a three-parameter scoring model integrating BSP expression, ISUP grading, and the number of affected core needle biopsies achieved 88.6% sensitivity and 81.1% specificity for predicting bone metastases.

Conclusion: BSP expression serves as a potential indicator for bone metastasis development but lacks sufficient sensitivity as a standalone clinical marker. Similarly, local tumor progression and histopathologic grading (ISUP) fail as single predictors. However, integrating BSP expression with established risk factors significantly enhances predictive accuracy. Given that all three parameters are derived from routine histopathological analysis, BSP immunohistochemistry should be considered for integration into clinical practice for early risk stratification in prostate cancer patients.

评估前列腺癌骨转移风险:使用BSP、ISUP分级和肿瘤进展的三参数模型。
骨转移是前列腺癌最常见的远处转移部位。有几个因素有助于预测骨转移,包括PSA水平升高,PSA倍增时间短,ISUP分级,局部肿瘤进展和新的生物标志物。然而,目前尚无临床评分系统来评估前列腺癌诊断时骨转移的风险。此外,尚未有研究探讨骨涎蛋白(bone saloprotein, BSP)在原发肿瘤中的表达与预测因素的相关性。方法:应用免疫组织化学方法评价前列腺癌患者经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下活检中BSP的表达。在7-9年的随访期间,分析了673名患者的数据,以评估骨转移的发展。BSP在良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者中的表达也被评估。此外,使用多元逻辑回归分析BSP表达与已确定的危险因素,以确定它们对骨转移的综合预测价值。结果:12.5%(84/673)的患者发生骨转移。23.8%的病例BSP表达为阴性(0 ~ 5%),22.2%的病例BSP表达为高表达(0 ~ 40%)。骨转移患者BSP表达明显高于无骨转移患者(55.5±19.7% vs. 25.7±24.9%;P < 0.001)。相比之下,97%的非前列腺癌患者BSP值低于5%。在转移性患者中:82.9%的BSP表达量至少为40%,没有低于20%的。作为单一预测参数,BSP的敏感性为50%,特异性为81.6%。然而,通过多变量分析,结合BSP表达、ISUP分级和受影响的核心针活检次数的三参数评分模型在预测骨转移方面的敏感性为88.6%,特异性为81.1%。结论:BSP表达可作为骨转移发生的潜在指标,但作为独立临床指标缺乏足够的敏感性。同样,局部肿瘤进展和组织病理学分级(ISUP)不能作为单一的预测指标。然而,将BSP表达与已确定的危险因素相结合可显著提高预测准确性。鉴于这三个参数均来自常规组织病理学分析,BSP免疫组织化学应被考虑纳入前列腺癌患者早期风险分层的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信