COVID-19 and Anticoagulant Use: Did the Pandemic Push DOACs Ahead of Warfarin?

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Bingwen Eugene Fan, Jia Hui Melissa Tan, Doreen Su-Yin Tan
{"title":"COVID-19 and Anticoagulant Use: Did the Pandemic Push DOACs Ahead of Warfarin?","authors":"Bingwen Eugene Fan, Jia Hui Melissa Tan, Doreen Su-Yin Tan","doi":"10.1055/a-2667-6770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unprecedented disruptions to health care delivery, compelling rapid adaptations in anticoagulation management. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), already displacing warfarin due to their convenience and reduced monitoring requirements, appeared well-positioned for broader adoption during pandemic-induced lockdowns. This commentary examines whether the pandemic catalyzed a meaningful shift in anticoagulant prescribing patterns from vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to DOACs, drawing on data from the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States, Europe, and Asia. In the United Kingdom, national guidance led to an abrupt and large-scale switch to DOACs, with sustained changes postpandemic. In contrast, Australia and the United States exhibited continuity in preexisting trends, with modest, transient shifts that did not persist. Asian and European data revealed a gradual trajectory toward DOACs, likely driven by long-term policy and infrastructure rather than acute pandemic pressures. While no universal transformation occurred, the pandemic accentuated existing preferences and exposed system-level vulnerabilities in warfarin monitoring. The global experience suggests that the COVID-19 crisis served as a selective accelerant of DOACs adoption, where health care systems and policies facilitated change. As health systems prepare for future disruptions, equitable access to DOACs and investment in remote care infrastructure will be essential to ensuring continuity and safety in anticoagulation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21673,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2667-6770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic introduced unprecedented disruptions to health care delivery, compelling rapid adaptations in anticoagulation management. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), already displacing warfarin due to their convenience and reduced monitoring requirements, appeared well-positioned for broader adoption during pandemic-induced lockdowns. This commentary examines whether the pandemic catalyzed a meaningful shift in anticoagulant prescribing patterns from vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to DOACs, drawing on data from the United Kingdom, Australia, the United States, Europe, and Asia. In the United Kingdom, national guidance led to an abrupt and large-scale switch to DOACs, with sustained changes postpandemic. In contrast, Australia and the United States exhibited continuity in preexisting trends, with modest, transient shifts that did not persist. Asian and European data revealed a gradual trajectory toward DOACs, likely driven by long-term policy and infrastructure rather than acute pandemic pressures. While no universal transformation occurred, the pandemic accentuated existing preferences and exposed system-level vulnerabilities in warfarin monitoring. The global experience suggests that the COVID-19 crisis served as a selective accelerant of DOACs adoption, where health care systems and policies facilitated change. As health systems prepare for future disruptions, equitable access to DOACs and investment in remote care infrastructure will be essential to ensuring continuity and safety in anticoagulation therapy.

COVID-19和抗凝血剂的使用:大流行是否使DOACs领先于华法林?
2019冠状病毒病大流行给医疗保健服务带来了前所未有的中断,迫使抗凝管理快速适应。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)由于其便利性和降低监测要求,已经取代了华法林,在大流行引起的封锁期间似乎可以更广泛地采用。本文利用来自英国、澳大利亚、美国、欧洲和亚洲的数据,探讨了大流行是否促进了抗凝血剂处方模式从维生素K拮抗剂(vka)到doac的有意义转变。在英国,国家指导导致突然大规模转向doac,并在大流行后持续变化。相比之下,澳大利亚和美国表现出原有趋势的连续性,只是出现了适度的、短暂的变化,但并未持续下去。亚洲和欧洲的数据显示,可能是由长期政策和基础设施推动的,而不是由严重的大流行压力推动的,逐步走向doac。虽然没有发生普遍的转变,但大流行加剧了现有的偏好,并暴露了华法林监测系统层面的脆弱性。全球经验表明,2019冠状病毒病危机是采用《行动纲领》的选择性加速器,其中卫生保健系统和政策促进了变革。随着卫生系统为未来的中断做好准备,公平获得doac和投资远程保健基础设施对于确保抗凝治疗的连续性和安全性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis
Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
21.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis is a topic driven review journal that focuses on all issues relating to hemostatic and thrombotic disorders. As one of the premiere review journals in the field, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis serves as a comprehensive forum for important advances in clinical and laboratory diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. The journal also publishes peer reviewed original research papers. Seminars offers an informed perspective on today''s pivotal issues, including hemophilia A & B, thrombophilia, gene therapy, venous and arterial thrombosis, von Willebrand disease, vascular disorders and thromboembolic diseases. Attention is also given to the latest developments in pharmaceutical drugs along with treatment and current management techniques. The journal also frequently publishes sponsored supplements to further highlight emerging trends in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信