Cognitive processes and pathways between social isolation, loneliness, and paranoia: findings from a cross-lagged network analysis of population-based data.

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Błażej Misiak
{"title":"Cognitive processes and pathways between social isolation, loneliness, and paranoia: findings from a cross-lagged network analysis of population-based data.","authors":"Błażej Misiak","doi":"10.1017/S003329172510130X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social disconnection, covering loneliness and social isolation, might be associated with the development of paranoid thoughts. Differential effects of loneliness and social isolation on the occurrence of paranoia have not been tested so far. Moreover, the role of cognitive mechanisms in these associations remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate differential associations of loneliness and social isolation with paranoid thoughts in the general population, considering the role of cognitive mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Altogether, 3,275 individuals, enrolled from the general population, completed baseline and follow-up assessments spanning 6-7 months. Cognitive biases (rejection sensitivity, attributional biases, and safety behaviors), social cognitive problems, and subjective cognitive problems were measured. The cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis was performed, controlling for the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric treatment, substance use, depressive, and anxiety symptoms. Additionally, mediation was tested for the CLPN paths linking social disconnection with paranoid ideation, with one intermediary node representing cognitive processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loneliness was the most important node in terms of predicting other network variables. It was bidirectionally associated with paranoid thoughts. Cognitive processes mediated these associations (partial mediation for ideas of reference and full mediation for ideas of persecution). In turn, social isolation predicted paranoid thoughts through the effects on loneliness. It was also predicted by paranoid thoughts through attributional biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social disconnection might be bidirectionally associated with paranoid thoughts. However, loneliness is more closely tied to paranoid thoughts compared to social isolation. Cognitive processes might mediate the association of social disconnection with paranoid thoughts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e215"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172510130X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social disconnection, covering loneliness and social isolation, might be associated with the development of paranoid thoughts. Differential effects of loneliness and social isolation on the occurrence of paranoia have not been tested so far. Moreover, the role of cognitive mechanisms in these associations remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate differential associations of loneliness and social isolation with paranoid thoughts in the general population, considering the role of cognitive mechanisms.

Methods: Altogether, 3,275 individuals, enrolled from the general population, completed baseline and follow-up assessments spanning 6-7 months. Cognitive biases (rejection sensitivity, attributional biases, and safety behaviors), social cognitive problems, and subjective cognitive problems were measured. The cross-lagged panel network (CLPN) analysis was performed, controlling for the effects of sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric treatment, substance use, depressive, and anxiety symptoms. Additionally, mediation was tested for the CLPN paths linking social disconnection with paranoid ideation, with one intermediary node representing cognitive processes.

Results: Loneliness was the most important node in terms of predicting other network variables. It was bidirectionally associated with paranoid thoughts. Cognitive processes mediated these associations (partial mediation for ideas of reference and full mediation for ideas of persecution). In turn, social isolation predicted paranoid thoughts through the effects on loneliness. It was also predicted by paranoid thoughts through attributional biases.

Conclusions: Social disconnection might be bidirectionally associated with paranoid thoughts. However, loneliness is more closely tied to paranoid thoughts compared to social isolation. Cognitive processes might mediate the association of social disconnection with paranoid thoughts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社会孤立、孤独和偏执之间的认知过程和途径:基于人口数据的交叉滞后网络分析的发现。
背景:社会脱节,包括孤独和社会孤立,可能与偏执思想的发展有关。到目前为止,孤独和社会隔离对偏执狂发生的不同影响尚未得到测试。此外,认知机制在这些关联中的作用仍然未知。本研究旨在探讨一般人群中孤独和社会隔离与偏执思想的不同关联,并考虑认知机制的作用。方法:总共从普通人群中招募了3275名个体,完成了6-7个月的基线和随访评估。测量了认知偏差(拒绝敏感性、归因偏差和安全行为)、社会认知问题和主观认知问题。进行交叉滞后面板网络(CLPN)分析,控制社会人口统计学特征、精神治疗、物质使用、抑郁和焦虑症状的影响。此外,通过一个代表认知过程的中间节点,对连接社会脱节与偏执观念的CLPN路径进行了中介测试。结果:孤独感是预测其他网络变量的最重要节点。它与偏执的想法是双向相关的。认知过程介导了这些关联(部分介导参照观念,完全介导迫害观念)。反过来,社会孤立通过对孤独的影响预测偏执思想。偏执思想也通过归因偏见预测了这一点。结论:社会脱节可能与偏执思想双向相关。然而,与社会孤立相比,孤独与偏执思想的关系更密切。认知过程可能调解社会脱节与偏执思想的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信