Clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and their association with reported suicide prevention practices.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alexandra L Morena, Larissa M Gaias, Celine Larkin, Yan Wang, Catarina Kiefe, Edwin D Boudreaux
{"title":"Clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and their association with reported suicide prevention practices.","authors":"Alexandra L Morena, Larissa M Gaias, Celine Larkin, Yan Wang, Catarina Kiefe, Edwin D Boudreaux","doi":"10.1037/ser0000981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many who die by suicide seek care in general health care settings within a year before death, but only recently has suicide prevention become a core responsibility in these settings. Implementing suicide prevention practices is challenging, and common barriers to adoption include clinician attitudes and self-efficacy. Identifying clinician profiles can further illuminate patterns of suicide prevention practice attitudes and self-efficacy within clinician subgroups to inform implementation strategy selection and development. This study identified distinct clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and examines their associations with suicide prevention practice delivery to patients. This study also investigated variables that help explain an individual's likelihood of belonging to latent profiles. Clinicians (<i>N</i> = 1,570) from one health care system completed a survey assessing attitudes, confidence in using suicide prevention practices, and current practice use. Latent profile analysis was conducted, followed by outcome and predictor analyses. Four unique profiles characterized by varying levels of attitudes and self-efficacy were identified. The profile characterized by poor attitudes toward the universal screening practice but high self-efficacy to utilize suicide prevention practices reported higher practice use with patients. Clinician characteristics (e.g., role) and contextual factors (e.g., leadership support) predicted profile membership. Results highlight meaningful variations in clinicians' suicide prevention attitudes and self-efficacy, identifying four distinct profiles. These findings highlight the need for further tailoring suicide prevention training and implementation strategy selection. Profiles characterized by neutral or low self-efficacy may benefit from implementation strategies that provide interactive assistance, while high confidence profiles may benefit from strategies targeting sustainment. Specific approaches to leverage these profiles for improved practice adoption are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many who die by suicide seek care in general health care settings within a year before death, but only recently has suicide prevention become a core responsibility in these settings. Implementing suicide prevention practices is challenging, and common barriers to adoption include clinician attitudes and self-efficacy. Identifying clinician profiles can further illuminate patterns of suicide prevention practice attitudes and self-efficacy within clinician subgroups to inform implementation strategy selection and development. This study identified distinct clinician profiles of suicide prevention attitudes and confidence and examines their associations with suicide prevention practice delivery to patients. This study also investigated variables that help explain an individual's likelihood of belonging to latent profiles. Clinicians (N = 1,570) from one health care system completed a survey assessing attitudes, confidence in using suicide prevention practices, and current practice use. Latent profile analysis was conducted, followed by outcome and predictor analyses. Four unique profiles characterized by varying levels of attitudes and self-efficacy were identified. The profile characterized by poor attitudes toward the universal screening practice but high self-efficacy to utilize suicide prevention practices reported higher practice use with patients. Clinician characteristics (e.g., role) and contextual factors (e.g., leadership support) predicted profile membership. Results highlight meaningful variations in clinicians' suicide prevention attitudes and self-efficacy, identifying four distinct profiles. These findings highlight the need for further tailoring suicide prevention training and implementation strategy selection. Profiles characterized by neutral or low self-efficacy may benefit from implementation strategies that provide interactive assistance, while high confidence profiles may benefit from strategies targeting sustainment. Specific approaches to leverage these profiles for improved practice adoption are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

自杀预防态度和信心的临床医生简介及其与报告的自杀预防实践的联系。
许多死于自杀的人在死前一年内到一般卫生保健机构寻求治疗,但直到最近,预防自杀才成为这些机构的核心责任。实施自杀预防措施是具有挑战性的,常见的障碍包括临床医生的态度和自我效能。确定临床医生的个人资料可以进一步阐明临床医生亚组中自杀预防实践态度和自我效能的模式,从而为实施策略的选择和发展提供信息。本研究确定了不同的临床医生对自杀预防态度和信心的概况,并检查了他们与向患者提供自杀预防实践的联系。这项研究还调查了有助于解释个人属于潜在概况的可能性的变量。来自一个医疗保健系统的临床医生(N = 1570)完成了一项调查,评估了使用自杀预防措施的态度、信心和目前的做法使用情况。进行潜在剖面分析,然后进行结果分析和预测因子分析。确定了四种独特的概况,其特征是不同程度的态度和自我效能。对普遍筛查的态度较差,但对自杀预防措施的自我效能感较高的患者报告了较高的自杀预防措施使用率。临床医生特征(例如,角色)和情境因素(例如,领导支持)预测档案成员。结果突出了临床医生自杀预防态度和自我效能感的有意义的变化,确定了四种不同的概况。这些发现强调了进一步定制自杀预防培训和实施策略选择的必要性。自我效能中性或低的档案可能受益于提供互动协助的实施策略,而高自信档案可能受益于以维持为目标的策略。讨论了利用这些概要文件来改进实践采用的具体方法。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信