Risk factors for delayed wound healing after anal fistula surgery: Protocol of a meta-analytic study.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0329030
Zubing Mei, Peixin Du, Ye Han, Yin Qu, Huili Tang, Yan Li, Huiyan Gao, Qingming Wang, De Zheng
{"title":"Risk factors for delayed wound healing after anal fistula surgery: Protocol of a meta-analytic study.","authors":"Zubing Mei, Peixin Du, Ye Han, Yin Qu, Huili Tang, Yan Li, Huiyan Gao, Qingming Wang, De Zheng","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0329030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Delayed wound healing (DWH) following anal fistula surgery is a common complication that prolongs recovery, increases patient morbidity, and imposes significant healthcare costs. Potential risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, fistula complexity, and surgical techniques have been suggested in individual studies, yet no comprehensive synthesis exists to guide clinical practice. This study aims to identify and evaluate risk factors associated with DWH after anal fistula surgery by combining existing evidence and grading the evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This study will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will search PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature databases from inception to March 2025, with no language restrictions. Observational studies (cohort and case-control) reporting risk factors for DWH, defined as incomplete healing beyond 6-12 weeks post-surgery, will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts, perform full-text reviews, extract data regarding study design, sample size, risk factors and outcomes, and assess risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Primary outcomes will include odds ratios (OR) or relative risks (RR) for factors such as comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and operative approaches. A random-effects meta-analysis will pool effect estimates if heterogeneity (I² < 50%) permits; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Subgroup analyses will explore differences by study design and patient characteristics, with publication bias assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study's strengths include its comprehensive search strategy and rigorous methodology, providing a robust synthesis of risk factors. Clinically, identifying modifiable risk factors could enhance preoperative optimization and postoperative care, reducing delayed healing rates. Future studies should standardize definitions of delayed healing and explore under-investigated factors like wound care techniques or microbiome influences to refine risk prediction models.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420251013602.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0329030"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Delayed wound healing (DWH) following anal fistula surgery is a common complication that prolongs recovery, increases patient morbidity, and imposes significant healthcare costs. Potential risk factors such as diabetes, smoking, fistula complexity, and surgical techniques have been suggested in individual studies, yet no comprehensive synthesis exists to guide clinical practice. This study aims to identify and evaluate risk factors associated with DWH after anal fistula surgery by combining existing evidence and grading the evidence.

Methods and analysis: This study will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will search PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and grey literature databases from inception to March 2025, with no language restrictions. Observational studies (cohort and case-control) reporting risk factors for DWH, defined as incomplete healing beyond 6-12 weeks post-surgery, will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen titles/abstracts, perform full-text reviews, extract data regarding study design, sample size, risk factors and outcomes, and assess risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Primary outcomes will include odds ratios (OR) or relative risks (RR) for factors such as comorbidities, lifestyle factors, and operative approaches. A random-effects meta-analysis will pool effect estimates if heterogeneity (I² < 50%) permits; otherwise, a narrative synthesis will be conducted. Subgroup analyses will explore differences by study design and patient characteristics, with publication bias assessed using funnel plots and Egger's test. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Discussion: This study's strengths include its comprehensive search strategy and rigorous methodology, providing a robust synthesis of risk factors. Clinically, identifying modifiable risk factors could enhance preoperative optimization and postoperative care, reducing delayed healing rates. Future studies should standardize definitions of delayed healing and explore under-investigated factors like wound care techniques or microbiome influences to refine risk prediction models.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD420251013602.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肛瘘术后伤口延迟愈合的危险因素:一项荟萃分析研究的方案。
肛瘘手术后伤口愈合延迟(DWH)是一种常见的并发症,它延长了恢复时间,增加了患者的发病率,并增加了大量的医疗费用。潜在的危险因素如糖尿病、吸烟、瘘管复杂性和手术技术已在个别研究中提出,但尚未有全面的综合来指导临床实践。本研究旨在通过结合现有证据并对证据进行分级,识别和评价肛瘘术后DWH的相关危险因素。方法和分析:本研究将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)指南。我们将检索PubMed, Embase, Cochrane图书馆,Web of Science和灰色文献数据库,从成立到2025年3月,没有语言限制。将纳入报告DWH危险因素的观察性研究(队列和病例对照),定义为术后6-12周不完全愈合。两名独立审稿人将筛选标题/摘要,进行全文审查,提取有关研究设计、样本量、风险因素和结果的数据,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估偏倚风险。主要结局将包括合并症、生活方式因素和手术方式等因素的优势比(OR)或相对风险(RR)。讨论:本研究的优势包括其全面的搜索策略和严格的方法,提供了一个强大的综合风险因素。在临床上,识别可改变的危险因素可以加强术前优化和术后护理,减少延迟愈合率。未来的研究应该标准化延迟愈合的定义,并探索未被研究的因素,如伤口护理技术或微生物组的影响,以完善风险预测模型。注册号:PROSPERO CRD420251013602。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信