Comparing Clinical Practice to Calculated Risks: A Retrospective Study on Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis in a Level-1 Hospital.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000004899
Erick F Mayer, Liborio Paz, Ariadna Rubio, Edgar Eslava, Maria Ribes, Anna Miralles, Laura Gerones, Jose M Inoriza
{"title":"Comparing Clinical Practice to Calculated Risks: A Retrospective Study on Early-onset Neonatal Sepsis in a Level-1 Hospital.","authors":"Erick F Mayer, Liborio Paz, Ariadna Rubio, Edgar Eslava, Maria Ribes, Anna Miralles, Laura Gerones, Jose M Inoriza","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000004899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, traditionally assessed through categorical risk factors. We explore the current incidence of EONS and evaluate the Kaiser Permanente neonatal sepsis calculator's impact on newborn management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study (2017-2022) at Hospital de Palamós involved 4782 live births. High-risk newborns were identified through International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes and blood culture results. Clinical and cost data were collected, and the Kaiser Permanente calculator's recommendations were compared with clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1533 high-risk newborns, 4 had confirmed clinical sepsis (0.84/1000 live births). The calculator recommended routine care for 2. Lowering the screening threshold improved sepsis case identification without a significant increase in interventions. Based on the modified recommendations, clinical observation would have been indicated in 763 (89.7%) of newborns who had a blood culture, in 57 (57%) of newborns who had a lumbar puncture done, and in 69 (56.1%) of newborns who received empiric antibiotics. Compliance correlated with shorter hospital stays [2.5 days (SD, 1.3) vs. 2.9 days (SD, 1.6), P < 0.001] and lower costs [884.1€ (SD, 307.4) vs. 1075.1€ (SD 521.8), P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Kaiser Permanente calculator, while effective for asymptomatic newborns, required adjustments for those with suggestive clinical signs. Adherence to modified recommendations showed potential benefits, including optimized resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19858,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1114-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004899","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, traditionally assessed through categorical risk factors. We explore the current incidence of EONS and evaluate the Kaiser Permanente neonatal sepsis calculator's impact on newborn management.

Methods: A retrospective study (2017-2022) at Hospital de Palamós involved 4782 live births. High-risk newborns were identified through International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes and blood culture results. Clinical and cost data were collected, and the Kaiser Permanente calculator's recommendations were compared with clinical practice.

Results: Of 1533 high-risk newborns, 4 had confirmed clinical sepsis (0.84/1000 live births). The calculator recommended routine care for 2. Lowering the screening threshold improved sepsis case identification without a significant increase in interventions. Based on the modified recommendations, clinical observation would have been indicated in 763 (89.7%) of newborns who had a blood culture, in 57 (57%) of newborns who had a lumbar puncture done, and in 69 (56.1%) of newborns who received empiric antibiotics. Compliance correlated with shorter hospital stays [2.5 days (SD, 1.3) vs. 2.9 days (SD, 1.6), P < 0.001] and lower costs [884.1€ (SD, 307.4) vs. 1075.1€ (SD 521.8), P < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Kaiser Permanente calculator, while effective for asymptomatic newborns, required adjustments for those with suggestive clinical signs. Adherence to modified recommendations showed potential benefits, including optimized resource allocation.

比较临床实践与计算风险:对某一级医院早发新生儿脓毒症的回顾性研究
背景:早发型新生儿脓毒症(EONS)是发病率和死亡率的重要原因,传统上通过分类危险因素进行评估。我们探讨了目前EONS的发病率,并评估了Kaiser Permanente新生儿脓毒症计算器对新生儿管理的影响。方法:在Palamós医院进行回顾性研究(2017-2022),涉及4782例活产婴儿。通过《国际疾病分类》第9次修订代码和血培养结果确定高危新生儿。收集临床和成本数据,并将Kaiser Permanente计算器的建议与临床实践进行比较。结果:1533例高危新生儿中,4例确诊临床败血症(0.84/1000活产)。计算器建议例行护理2年。降低筛查阈值可在不显著增加干预措施的情况下改善败血症病例的识别。根据修改后的建议,763例(89.7%)进行血培养的新生儿需要临床观察,57例(57%)进行腰椎穿刺的新生儿需要临床观察,69例(56.1%)接受经验性抗生素治疗的新生儿需要临床观察。依从性与较短的住院时间相关[2.5天(SD, 1.3)对2.9天(SD, 1.6), P < 0.001]和较低的费用[884.1欧元(SD, 307.4)对1075.1欧元(SD, 521.8), P < 0.001)。结论:Kaiser Permanente计算器对无症状新生儿有效,但对有提示临床体征的新生儿需要调整。坚持修改后的建议显示出潜在的好处,包括优化资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal® (PIDJ) is a complete, up-to-the-minute resource on infectious diseases in children. Through a mix of original studies, informative review articles, and unique case reports, PIDJ delivers the latest insights on combating disease in children — from state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques to the most effective drug therapies and other treatment protocols. It is a resource that can improve patient care and stimulate your personal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信