The Impact of Self-Perceived Burden on Loneliness in Stroke Patients: The Mediating Role of Rumination.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2025-07-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S528307
Xinxin Zhou, Lina Guo, Yuanli Guo, Genoosha Namassevayam, Peng Zhao, Mengyu Zhang, Yuying Xie, Yanjin Liu
{"title":"The Impact of Self-Perceived Burden on Loneliness in Stroke Patients: The Mediating Role of Rumination.","authors":"Xinxin Zhou, Lina Guo, Yuanli Guo, Genoosha Namassevayam, Peng Zhao, Mengyu Zhang, Yuying Xie, Yanjin Liu","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S528307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke outcomes are often measured through objective scales, which may neglect subtle cognitive changes and fail to capture patients' subjective experiences of recovery and quality of life. This study aimed to examine the interrelations among self-perceived burden, loneliness, and rumination in stroke survivors through the patient-reported outcomes and to provide theoretical insights and intervention strategies for improving psychological well-being and quality of life in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data from 1024 stroke patients who aged 18 years and above were prospectively collected in September 2022 in Zhengzhou, China. PROs included Self-Perceived Burden Scale, UCLA-Loneliness Scale, and Event-Related Rumination Inventory. Statistical methods employed included correlation analysis and mediation effect analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1024 participants completed this survey (90.9%), with 56.2% males and a mean age of 62.22 (SD = 13.60) years. Approximately 84.28% of stroke patients felt moderate loneliness. Self-perceived burden was positively correlated with rumination (<i>r</i> = 0.516, 95% CI [0.460, 0.574]) and loneliness (<i>r</i> = 0.370, 95% CI [0.307, 0.431]). Rumination was also positively associated with loneliness (<i>r</i> = 0.493, 95% CI [0.443, 0.541]). Both intrusive and deliberate rumination served as mediators in the relationship between SPB and loneliness (<i>b</i> = 0.119, 55.09%, <i>b</i> = 0.031, 14.35%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intrusive and deliberate rumination mediated the relationship between self-perceived burden and loneliness in stroke patients. Rumination in stroke patients should be emphasized as a modifiable factor to reduce loneliness and improve quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"16 ","pages":"105-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S528307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke outcomes are often measured through objective scales, which may neglect subtle cognitive changes and fail to capture patients' subjective experiences of recovery and quality of life. This study aimed to examine the interrelations among self-perceived burden, loneliness, and rumination in stroke survivors through the patient-reported outcomes and to provide theoretical insights and intervention strategies for improving psychological well-being and quality of life in stroke patients.

Methodology: Data from 1024 stroke patients who aged 18 years and above were prospectively collected in September 2022 in Zhengzhou, China. PROs included Self-Perceived Burden Scale, UCLA-Loneliness Scale, and Event-Related Rumination Inventory. Statistical methods employed included correlation analysis and mediation effect analysis.

Results: A total of 1024 participants completed this survey (90.9%), with 56.2% males and a mean age of 62.22 (SD = 13.60) years. Approximately 84.28% of stroke patients felt moderate loneliness. Self-perceived burden was positively correlated with rumination (r = 0.516, 95% CI [0.460, 0.574]) and loneliness (r = 0.370, 95% CI [0.307, 0.431]). Rumination was also positively associated with loneliness (r = 0.493, 95% CI [0.443, 0.541]). Both intrusive and deliberate rumination served as mediators in the relationship between SPB and loneliness (b = 0.119, 55.09%, b = 0.031, 14.35%, respectively).

Conclusion: Intrusive and deliberate rumination mediated the relationship between self-perceived burden and loneliness in stroke patients. Rumination in stroke patients should be emphasized as a modifiable factor to reduce loneliness and improve quality of life.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自我知觉负担对脑卒中患者孤独感的影响:反刍的中介作用。
背景:卒中预后通常通过客观量表来衡量,这可能会忽略细微的认知变化,无法捕捉患者对康复和生活质量的主观体验。本研究旨在通过患者报告的结果,探讨脑卒中幸存者自我感知负担、孤独感和反思之间的相互关系,并为改善脑卒中患者的心理健康和生活质量提供理论见解和干预策略。方法:于2022年9月在中国郑州前瞻性收集1024例18岁及以上脑卒中患者的数据。支持量表包括自我感知负担量表、ucla孤独量表和事件相关反刍量表。统计方法包括相关分析和中介效应分析。结果:共1024人(90.9%)完成调查,其中男性56.2%,平均年龄62.22岁(SD = 13.60)岁。大约84.28%的中风患者感到中度孤独。自我感知负担与反刍(r = 0.516, 95% CI[0.460, 0.574])和孤独感(r = 0.370, 95% CI[0.307, 0.431])呈正相关。反刍与孤独感也呈正相关(r = 0.493, 95% CI[0.443, 0.541])。侵入性反刍和刻意反刍在自我行为行为与孤独感的关系中起中介作用(b = 0.119, 55.09%, b = 0.031, 14.35%)。结论:侵入性和刻意反刍在脑卒中患者自我感知负担与孤独感的关系中起中介作用。脑卒中患者应重视反思,将其作为减少孤独感和提高生活质量的一个可改变因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信