Cost-effectiveness of chikungunya vaccination with the live attenuated vaccine in U.S. territories.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Kelly Kilburn, Martin I Meltzer, Seonghye Jeon, Bishwa B Adhikari, Nicole Lindsey, Susan L Hills, J Erin Staples
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of chikungunya vaccination with the live attenuated vaccine in U.S. territories.","authors":"Kelly Kilburn, Martin I Meltzer, Seonghye Jeon, Bishwa B Adhikari, Nicole Lindsey, Susan L Hills, J Erin Staples","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01194-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A live attenuated chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ, was approved in the United States in 2023 for use in adults. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of two different vaccination strategies, routine and outbreak vaccination, for persons aged ≥18 years living in U.S. territories with previous transmission. We included the entire population of impacted U.S. territories and assumed one chikungunya outbreak occurring during a 30-year time horizon. We estimated that routine vaccination would avert 90% of the disease burden and cost $498 million (16% savings compared with no vaccination) while outbreak vaccination would avert 67% of the disease burden and cost $552 million (6% savings). Both strategies were more costly than no vaccination from the healthcare payer perspective. Routine vaccination was cost-saving for all outcomes assessed from a societal perspective. Outbreak vaccination was cost-saving for averted symptomatic cases but cost from $5 [95% CI: cost savings, $191] per chronic joint pain case averted to $373,054 [95% CI: $172,643, $573,464] per death averted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01194-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A live attenuated chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ, was approved in the United States in 2023 for use in adults. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of two different vaccination strategies, routine and outbreak vaccination, for persons aged ≥18 years living in U.S. territories with previous transmission. We included the entire population of impacted U.S. territories and assumed one chikungunya outbreak occurring during a 30-year time horizon. We estimated that routine vaccination would avert 90% of the disease burden and cost $498 million (16% savings compared with no vaccination) while outbreak vaccination would avert 67% of the disease burden and cost $552 million (6% savings). Both strategies were more costly than no vaccination from the healthcare payer perspective. Routine vaccination was cost-saving for all outcomes assessed from a societal perspective. Outbreak vaccination was cost-saving for averted symptomatic cases but cost from $5 [95% CI: cost savings, $191] per chronic joint pain case averted to $373,054 [95% CI: $172,643, $573,464] per death averted.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基孔肯雅病毒减毒活疫苗在美国境内接种的成本效益。
一种基孔肯雅减毒活疫苗IXCHIQ于2023年在美国被批准用于成人。我们评估了两种不同疫苗接种策略的成本效益,常规和暴发疫苗接种,对于居住在美国领土上既往有传播的年龄≥18岁的人。我们纳入了受影响的美国领土的全部人口,并假设在30年的时间范围内发生一次基孔肯雅热爆发。我们估计,常规疫苗接种将避免90%的疾病负担,费用为4.98亿美元(与不接种相比节省16%),而爆发疫苗接种将避免67%的疾病负担,费用为5.52亿美元(节省6%)。从医疗保健付款人的角度来看,这两种策略都比不接种疫苗成本更高。从社会角度评估的所有结果来看,常规疫苗接种都节省了成本。暴发疫苗接种可为避免出现症状的病例节省成本,但成本从每个避免慢性关节疼痛病例的5美元[95% CI:节省成本,191美元]到每个避免死亡的373,054美元[95% CI: 172,643美元,573,464美元]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NPJ Vaccines
NPJ Vaccines Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信