Kelly Kilburn, Martin I Meltzer, Seonghye Jeon, Bishwa B Adhikari, Nicole Lindsey, Susan L Hills, J Erin Staples
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of chikungunya vaccination with the live attenuated vaccine in U.S. territories.","authors":"Kelly Kilburn, Martin I Meltzer, Seonghye Jeon, Bishwa B Adhikari, Nicole Lindsey, Susan L Hills, J Erin Staples","doi":"10.1038/s41541-025-01194-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A live attenuated chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ, was approved in the United States in 2023 for use in adults. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of two different vaccination strategies, routine and outbreak vaccination, for persons aged ≥18 years living in U.S. territories with previous transmission. We included the entire population of impacted U.S. territories and assumed one chikungunya outbreak occurring during a 30-year time horizon. We estimated that routine vaccination would avert 90% of the disease burden and cost $498 million (16% savings compared with no vaccination) while outbreak vaccination would avert 67% of the disease burden and cost $552 million (6% savings). Both strategies were more costly than no vaccination from the healthcare payer perspective. Routine vaccination was cost-saving for all outcomes assessed from a societal perspective. Outbreak vaccination was cost-saving for averted symptomatic cases but cost from $5 [95% CI: cost savings, $191] per chronic joint pain case averted to $373,054 [95% CI: $172,643, $573,464] per death averted.</p>","PeriodicalId":19335,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Vaccines","volume":"10 1","pages":"172"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12304215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Vaccines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-025-01194-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A live attenuated chikungunya vaccine, IXCHIQ, was approved in the United States in 2023 for use in adults. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of two different vaccination strategies, routine and outbreak vaccination, for persons aged ≥18 years living in U.S. territories with previous transmission. We included the entire population of impacted U.S. territories and assumed one chikungunya outbreak occurring during a 30-year time horizon. We estimated that routine vaccination would avert 90% of the disease burden and cost $498 million (16% savings compared with no vaccination) while outbreak vaccination would avert 67% of the disease burden and cost $552 million (6% savings). Both strategies were more costly than no vaccination from the healthcare payer perspective. Routine vaccination was cost-saving for all outcomes assessed from a societal perspective. Outbreak vaccination was cost-saving for averted symptomatic cases but cost from $5 [95% CI: cost savings, $191] per chronic joint pain case averted to $373,054 [95% CI: $172,643, $573,464] per death averted.
NPJ VaccinesImmunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
146
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
Online-only and open access, npj Vaccines is dedicated to highlighting the most important scientific advances in vaccine research and development.