Lactose Breath Test and Genotyping Showed Higher Concordance Than the Urine Gaxilose Test for the Diagnosis of Lactose Malabsorption in Adults.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
V Martín-Dominguez, M C López-Vega, T Álvarez-Malé, I Pérez-Lucendo, R Ferreiros-Martínez, I Granero-Cremades, A Ezquerra-Durán, M I Berlanga-Gómez, J Fernández-Pacheco, V Mancheño-Del Real, C Santander, E J Laserna-Mendieta
{"title":"Lactose Breath Test and Genotyping Showed Higher Concordance Than the Urine Gaxilose Test for the Diagnosis of Lactose Malabsorption in Adults.","authors":"V Martín-Dominguez, M C López-Vega, T Álvarez-Malé, I Pérez-Lucendo, R Ferreiros-Martínez, I Granero-Cremades, A Ezquerra-Durán, M I Berlanga-Gómez, J Fernández-Pacheco, V Mancheño-Del Real, C Santander, E J Laserna-Mendieta","doi":"10.1111/nmo.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lactose malabsorption (LM) is a common condition that occurs when undigested lactose reaches the colon, often causing symptoms such as diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pain. Diagnosis can be obtained by performing several tests, each with advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare three of the five available methods-the genetic, the urine gaxilose, and the lactose breath tests (LBT) - to evaluate their concordance and assess patient preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an observational and prospective study from two Spanish hospitals, including 73 adult patients with digestive symptoms and LM suspicion. Alongside the three evaluated methods, the lactose intolerance quick test was performed on duodenal samples in a subgroup of patients. Interpretation of LM was determined based on test concordance. Patient questionnaires were completed once all the tests had been performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 71% of female patients, the mean age was 37.6 years, and 52% showed LM. The patients with LM more commonly displayed nausea or vomiting (p = 0.039), avoidance of dairy products (p = 0.023), and use of analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory drugs (p = 0.016). Higher concordance among tests was found in patients without LM (83%), compared to 53% in patients with LM, due to false negatives (32%) for the gaxilose test. All tests showed over 90% sensitivity, with LBT displaying the highest (97%). Genetic testing showed the highest specificity (95%) and the gaxilose test the lowest (68%). Among the three tests, 72% of patients preferred the genetic test.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LBT and genetic tests showed higher concordance than gaxilose for detecting LM.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"e70130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.70130","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lactose malabsorption (LM) is a common condition that occurs when undigested lactose reaches the colon, often causing symptoms such as diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pain. Diagnosis can be obtained by performing several tests, each with advantages and disadvantages. This study aims to compare three of the five available methods-the genetic, the urine gaxilose, and the lactose breath tests (LBT) - to evaluate their concordance and assess patient preferences.

Methods: This is an observational and prospective study from two Spanish hospitals, including 73 adult patients with digestive symptoms and LM suspicion. Alongside the three evaluated methods, the lactose intolerance quick test was performed on duodenal samples in a subgroup of patients. Interpretation of LM was determined based on test concordance. Patient questionnaires were completed once all the tests had been performed.

Results: There were 71% of female patients, the mean age was 37.6 years, and 52% showed LM. The patients with LM more commonly displayed nausea or vomiting (p = 0.039), avoidance of dairy products (p = 0.023), and use of analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory drugs (p = 0.016). Higher concordance among tests was found in patients without LM (83%), compared to 53% in patients with LM, due to false negatives (32%) for the gaxilose test. All tests showed over 90% sensitivity, with LBT displaying the highest (97%). Genetic testing showed the highest specificity (95%) and the gaxilose test the lowest (68%). Among the three tests, 72% of patients preferred the genetic test.

Conclusions: The LBT and genetic tests showed higher concordance than gaxilose for detecting LM.

乳糖呼气试验和基因分型诊断成人乳糖吸收不良的一致性高于尿葡萄糖试验。
背景:乳糖吸收不良(LM)是一种常见病,当未消化的乳糖到达结肠时,通常会引起腹泻、胀气和腹痛等症状。诊断可以通过进行几种测试来获得,每种测试都有优点和缺点。这项研究的目的是比较五种可用方法中的三种——基因测试、尿葡萄糖测试和乳糖呼吸测试(LBT)——以评估它们的一致性和评估患者的偏好。方法:这是一项来自西班牙两家医院的观察性和前瞻性研究,包括73名有消化症状和LM怀疑的成年患者。除了这三种评估方法外,还对一组患者的十二指肠样本进行了乳糖不耐受快速试验。根据测试一致性确定LM的解释。在完成所有测试后,完成患者调查表。结果:女性占71%,平均年龄37.6岁,其中52%为LM。LM患者更常见的表现为恶心或呕吐(p = 0.039),避免乳制品(p = 0.023),使用镇痛和/或抗炎药物(p = 0.016)。由于盖西洛糖检测的假阴性(32%),无LM患者的检测结果一致性较高(83%),而LM患者的检测结果一致性为53%。所有测试显示灵敏度超过90%,其中LBT显示最高(97%)。基因检测显示最高特异性(95%),葡萄糖检测最低特异性(68%)。在三种检测中,72%的患者更倾向于基因检测。结论:LBT与基因检测在LM检测上的一致性高于甘露糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信