Comparative efficacy of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy on pain intensity after elastomeric separator placement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shasha Gao, Peipei Wu, Yang Cheng
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy on pain intensity after elastomeric separator placement: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Shasha Gao, Peipei Wu, Yang Cheng","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000043559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This research aimed to assess the efficacy of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in pain reduction following the placement of elastomeric separators, utilizing a network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our objective was to determine the most effective method for pain management in orthodontic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42025640519). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases up to January 19, 2025, to identify RCTs evaluating the impact of ibuprofen and LLLT on pain intensity following orthodontic separator placement. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A NMA was performed to combine direct and indirect comparisons, ranking the interventions based on their effectiveness in alleviating pain at 6 hours and 24 hours after orthodontic separator placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies with 1007 participants were included in the NMA. Both ibuprofen and LLLT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain intensity compared to control or placebo groups at all assessed time points. For ibuprofen, pain reduction was observed at 6-hour with a mean difference (MD) of -1.93 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -2.93 to -0.93, and at 24-hour with an MD of -1.63 (95% CI: -2.58 to -0.68). For LLLT, the MD at 6-hour was -1.46 (95% CI: -2.28 to -0.64), and at 24-hour, the MD was -1.84 (95% CI: -2.52 to -1.16). Ibuprofen showed greater effectiveness in reducing pain intensity at 6-hour, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 88.4, whereas LLLT demonstrated more sustained reduction at 24-hour, with a SUCRA of 81.8.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This NMA provides evidence that both ibuprofen and LLLT are effective in reducing pain following elastomeric separator placement. Ibuprofen offers more immediate pain reduction, whereas LLLT offers more sustained effects over 24-hour. These findings suggest that a time-dependent, multimodal approach may be beneficial for optimizing orthodontic pain management. To further validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols, more high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed, particularly those involving direct, head-to-head comparisons between ibuprofen and LLLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"104 30","pages":"e43559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303510/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000043559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This research aimed to assess the efficacy of ibuprofen and low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in pain reduction following the placement of elastomeric separators, utilizing a network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our objective was to determine the most effective method for pain management in orthodontic patients.

Methods: This study was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42025640519). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across various databases up to January 19, 2025, to identify RCTs evaluating the impact of ibuprofen and LLLT on pain intensity following orthodontic separator placement. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. A NMA was performed to combine direct and indirect comparisons, ranking the interventions based on their effectiveness in alleviating pain at 6 hours and 24 hours after orthodontic separator placement.

Results: Twenty-three studies with 1007 participants were included in the NMA. Both ibuprofen and LLLT demonstrated significantly greater reductions in pain intensity compared to control or placebo groups at all assessed time points. For ibuprofen, pain reduction was observed at 6-hour with a mean difference (MD) of -1.93 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of -2.93 to -0.93, and at 24-hour with an MD of -1.63 (95% CI: -2.58 to -0.68). For LLLT, the MD at 6-hour was -1.46 (95% CI: -2.28 to -0.64), and at 24-hour, the MD was -1.84 (95% CI: -2.52 to -1.16). Ibuprofen showed greater effectiveness in reducing pain intensity at 6-hour, with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 88.4, whereas LLLT demonstrated more sustained reduction at 24-hour, with a SUCRA of 81.8.

Conclusion: This NMA provides evidence that both ibuprofen and LLLT are effective in reducing pain following elastomeric separator placement. Ibuprofen offers more immediate pain reduction, whereas LLLT offers more sustained effects over 24-hour. These findings suggest that a time-dependent, multimodal approach may be beneficial for optimizing orthodontic pain management. To further validate these findings and establish standardized clinical protocols, more high-quality randomized clinical trials are needed, particularly those involving direct, head-to-head comparisons between ibuprofen and LLLT.

布洛芬与低水平激光治疗对弹性体隔片置入后疼痛强度的比较疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:本研究旨在利用网络meta分析(NMA)综合相关随机对照试验(rct)的数据,评估布洛芬和低水平激光治疗(LLLT)在放置弹性分离器后疼痛减轻的疗效。我们的目的是确定治疗正畸患者疼痛的最有效方法。方法:本研究已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42025640519)。在截至2025年1月19日的各种数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,以确定评估布洛芬和LLLT对正畸隔离器放置后疼痛强度影响的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估纳入研究的质量。采用NMA结合直接和间接比较,根据正畸隔离器放置后6小时和24小时缓解疼痛的有效性对干预措施进行排名。结果:23项研究共1007名参与者被纳入NMA。在所有评估时间点,与对照组或安慰剂组相比,布洛芬和LLLT均显示疼痛强度的显著降低。对于布洛芬,6小时疼痛减轻,平均差值(MD)为-1.93,95%可信区间(CI)为-2.93至-0.93,24小时疼痛减轻,MD为-1.63 (95% CI: -2.58至-0.68)。对于LLLT, 6小时的MD为-1.46 (95% CI: -2.28至-0.64),24小时的MD为-1.84 (95% CI: -2.52至-1.16)。布洛芬在6小时时表现出更大的减轻疼痛强度的效果,其累积排名曲线下的表面(SUCRA)为88.4,而LLLT在24小时时表现出更持续的减轻,SUCRA为81.8。结论:该NMA提供了证据,表明布洛芬和LLLT都能有效减轻弹性分离器放置后的疼痛。布洛芬能更直接地减轻疼痛,而LLLT能在24小时内提供更持久的效果。这些发现表明,时间依赖性,多模式的方法可能有利于优化正畸疼痛管理。为了进一步验证这些发现并建立标准化的临床方案,需要更多高质量的随机临床试验,特别是那些涉及布洛芬和LLLT之间直接、正面比较的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信