A Group Concept Mapping Study to Define Humanizing Health Care.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sean Tackett, Gayle Adams, Belinda Chen, Scott M Wright
{"title":"A Group Concept Mapping Study to Define Humanizing Health Care.","authors":"Sean Tackett, Gayle Adams, Belinda Chen, Scott M Wright","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically define humanizing health care to guide systems improvements that better meet patient and health care workers' needs.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>We conducted group concept mapping at Johns Hopkins Medicine, a large academic health system with five hospitals in Maryland and Washington, DC, outpatient practices, telemedicine, and homecare services. From October 2023 to May 2024, we recruited participants who brainstormed to the focus prompt: \"One thing that can be done to more fully humanize healthcare experiences is:\" The study team synthesized ideas for participants to sort them. Group concept mapping software generated cluster maps, which were interpreted by the study team to generate the concept map.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In brainstorming, 63 individuals participated, including those with the perspectives of patients (n=40, 63%), caregivers (n=25, 40%), physicians (n=23, 37%), other types of health care professionals (n=14, 22%), health professions educators (n=28, 44%), and health care researchers (n=25, 40%). The 395 statements from brainstorming were synthesized into 207 ideas for sorting, which was completed by 13 participants. The final concept map included eight domains and 32 subdomains. Domains addressed: (1) effective communication, (2) health care worker attitudes, (3) health care culture, (4) health care worker community, (5) institutional policies and health care value, (6) physical and digital systems and access to care, (7) time and attention for patients, and (8) embedding patient perspectives throughout health care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health care is fundamentally about human experiences. This concept map, generated by individuals representing the perspectives of a variety of individuals involved in health care, offers guidance for interventions and measures to make health care more humanizing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18334,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2025.04.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To systematically define humanizing health care to guide systems improvements that better meet patient and health care workers' needs.

Participants and methods: We conducted group concept mapping at Johns Hopkins Medicine, a large academic health system with five hospitals in Maryland and Washington, DC, outpatient practices, telemedicine, and homecare services. From October 2023 to May 2024, we recruited participants who brainstormed to the focus prompt: "One thing that can be done to more fully humanize healthcare experiences is:" The study team synthesized ideas for participants to sort them. Group concept mapping software generated cluster maps, which were interpreted by the study team to generate the concept map.

Results: In brainstorming, 63 individuals participated, including those with the perspectives of patients (n=40, 63%), caregivers (n=25, 40%), physicians (n=23, 37%), other types of health care professionals (n=14, 22%), health professions educators (n=28, 44%), and health care researchers (n=25, 40%). The 395 statements from brainstorming were synthesized into 207 ideas for sorting, which was completed by 13 participants. The final concept map included eight domains and 32 subdomains. Domains addressed: (1) effective communication, (2) health care worker attitudes, (3) health care culture, (4) health care worker community, (5) institutional policies and health care value, (6) physical and digital systems and access to care, (7) time and attention for patients, and (8) embedding patient perspectives throughout health care.

Conclusion: Health care is fundamentally about human experiences. This concept map, generated by individuals representing the perspectives of a variety of individuals involved in health care, offers guidance for interventions and measures to make health care more humanizing.

定义人性化医疗保健的群体概念映射研究。
目的:系统地定义人性化卫生保健,以指导系统改进,更好地满足患者和卫生保健工作者的需求。参与者和方法:我们在约翰霍普金斯医学院进行了群体概念映射,这是一个大型学术卫生系统,在马里兰州和华盛顿特区拥有五家医院,门诊实践,远程医疗和家庭护理服务。从2023年10月到2024年5月,我们招募了一些参与者,他们对焦点提示进行了头脑风暴:“为了更充分地使医疗保健体验人性化,可以做的一件事是:”研究团队综合了参与者的想法,让他们对它们进行分类。组概念图软件生成聚类图,研究小组对聚类图进行解释,生成概念图。结果:在头脑风暴中,63个人参与,包括患者(n=40, 63%),护理人员(n=25, 40%),医生(n=23, 37%),其他类型的卫生保健专业人员(n=14, 22%),卫生专业教育者(n=28, 44%)和卫生保健研究人员(n=25, 40%)的观点。头脑风暴的395个陈述被综合成207个想法进行分类,由13名参与者完成。最终的概念图包括8个域和32个子域。涉及的领域:(1)有效沟通,(2)医护人员态度,(3)医护人员文化,(4)医护人员社区,(5)机构政策和医疗保健价值,(6)物理和数字系统以及获得护理的途径,(7)患者的时间和注意力,以及(8)在整个医疗保健中嵌入患者的观点。结论:卫生保健从根本上讲是关于人的体验。这张概念图由个人绘制,代表了参与卫生保健的各种个人的观点,为使卫生保健更加人性化的干预措施和措施提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings
Mayo Clinic proceedings 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Mayo Clinic Proceedings is a premier peer-reviewed clinical journal in general medicine. Sponsored by Mayo Clinic, it is one of the most widely read and highly cited scientific publications for physicians. Since 1926, Mayo Clinic Proceedings has continuously published articles that focus on clinical medicine and support the professional and educational needs of its readers. The journal welcomes submissions from authors worldwide and includes Nobel-prize-winning research in its content. With an Impact Factor of 8.9, Mayo Clinic Proceedings is ranked #20 out of 167 journals in the Medicine, General and Internal category, placing it in the top 12% of these journals. It invites manuscripts on clinical and laboratory medicine, health care policy and economics, medical education and ethics, and related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信