Kaitlin A Moorhead, Dylan M Burke, Laura A Adamovicz, Gretchen C Anchor, William Graser, Gary Glowacki, Matthew C Allender
{"title":"Characterizing the Performance of Multiple Testing Modalities to Detect Emydomyces testavorans in Blanding's Turtles (Emydoidea blandingii).","authors":"Kaitlin A Moorhead, Dylan M Burke, Laura A Adamovicz, Gretchen C Anchor, William Graser, Gary Glowacki, Matthew C Allender","doi":"10.7589/JWD-D-25-00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Emydomyces testavorans is a recently described fungus associated with significant shell disease in chelonians, including Illinois state-endangered Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Characterizing the epidemiology of this pathogen requires accurate detection; however, E. testavorans is challenging to detect and optimal antemortem sampling strategies have not been identified. In total, 90 juvenile Blanding's turtles from two populations naturally infected with E. testavorans were used to determine the detection performance of different testing approaches and establish optimal sampling strategies in the context of commonly encountered clinical and management scenarios. Turtles received comprehensive physical examinations and computed tomography scans to document grossly apparent and/or radiographic shell lesions. Multiple sample types were tested for E. testavorans via quantitative PCR (qPCR), including shell swabs, combined cloacal-oral swabs, combined cloacal-oral-shell swabs (COSSs) swabs, and tank water samples. Latent class modeling was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each detection method in the absence of a gold standard test. Using multiple tests often increases information available to decision-makers; therefore, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for two E. testavorans detection methods interpreted either in series or in parallel. Latent class modeling demonstrated that COSS and water qPCRs were highly sensitive (98.0 and 94.0%, respectively) and adequately specific (74.9 and 88.3%, respectively) for E. testavorans; thus, these testing methods are recommended for routine surveillance where use of multiple methods is not possible. In wild and head-started Blanding's turtle populations where false negatives are costly, qPCR testing of two COSS samples interpreted in parallel maximized sensitivity (sensitivity=100%, specificity=56.1%) and is recommended for E. testavorans surveillance when multiple tests are available. This study provides objective measures to guide effective E. testavorans testing and inform future epidemiologic studies, support chelonian medicine, and empower conservation managers, ultimately safeguarding turtle health in managed care and wild settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/JWD-D-25-00001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Emydomyces testavorans is a recently described fungus associated with significant shell disease in chelonians, including Illinois state-endangered Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingii). Characterizing the epidemiology of this pathogen requires accurate detection; however, E. testavorans is challenging to detect and optimal antemortem sampling strategies have not been identified. In total, 90 juvenile Blanding's turtles from two populations naturally infected with E. testavorans were used to determine the detection performance of different testing approaches and establish optimal sampling strategies in the context of commonly encountered clinical and management scenarios. Turtles received comprehensive physical examinations and computed tomography scans to document grossly apparent and/or radiographic shell lesions. Multiple sample types were tested for E. testavorans via quantitative PCR (qPCR), including shell swabs, combined cloacal-oral swabs, combined cloacal-oral-shell swabs (COSSs) swabs, and tank water samples. Latent class modeling was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of each detection method in the absence of a gold standard test. Using multiple tests often increases information available to decision-makers; therefore, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for two E. testavorans detection methods interpreted either in series or in parallel. Latent class modeling demonstrated that COSS and water qPCRs were highly sensitive (98.0 and 94.0%, respectively) and adequately specific (74.9 and 88.3%, respectively) for E. testavorans; thus, these testing methods are recommended for routine surveillance where use of multiple methods is not possible. In wild and head-started Blanding's turtle populations where false negatives are costly, qPCR testing of two COSS samples interpreted in parallel maximized sensitivity (sensitivity=100%, specificity=56.1%) and is recommended for E. testavorans surveillance when multiple tests are available. This study provides objective measures to guide effective E. testavorans testing and inform future epidemiologic studies, support chelonian medicine, and empower conservation managers, ultimately safeguarding turtle health in managed care and wild settings.
期刊介绍:
The JWD publishes reports of wildlife disease investigations, research papers, brief research notes, case and epizootic reports, review articles, and book reviews. The JWD publishes the results of original research and observations dealing with all aspects of infectious, parasitic, toxic, nutritional, physiologic, developmental and neoplastic diseases, environmental contamination, and other factors impinging on the health and survival of free-living or occasionally captive populations of wild animals, including fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals. Papers on zoonoses involving wildlife and on chemical immobilization of wild animals are also published. Manuscripts dealing with surveys and case reports may be published in the Journal provided that they contain significant new information or have significance for better understanding health and disease in wild populations. Authors are encouraged to address the wildlife management implications of their studies, where appropriate.