{"title":"Second Trimester LGA as a Predictor of Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Does Timing of Fetal Overgrowth Matters?","authors":"Dilara Duygulu Bulan, Zeynep Seyhanli, Ruken Dayanan, Merve Ayas Ozkan, Muradiye Yildirim, Ali Turhan Caglar","doi":"10.1002/jum.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses diagnosed ultrasonographically in the second trimester with adverse perinatal outcomes and to determine the impact of the timing of fetal overgrowth on neonatal outcomes. Accordingly, we investigated whether pregnancies with LGA diagnosed in the second trimester differed in terms of perinatal complications compared to those diagnosed in the third trimester.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted with pregnant women who presented to the Perinatology Department of Ankara Etlik City Hospital and gave birth to macrosomic fetuses. Patients were grouped as those who were not diagnosed with LGA antenatally and those who were diagnosed with LGA on ultrasound examination in the second and third trimesters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pregnant women diagnosed with LGA in the second trimester had a higher mean age compared to the AGA group, and the LGA group showed the highest mean age in the third trimester (P = .010). The rate of newborns with APGAR score <7 at 1 minute was significantly higher in the second trimester LGA group compared to the AGA group (P = .029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that LGA cases diagnosed in the second trimester were associated with significantly higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes compared to those diagnosed in the third trimester. The findings suggest that the timing of fetal growth may be a determinant not only for birth weight but also for neonatal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of large for gestational age (LGA) fetuses diagnosed ultrasonographically in the second trimester with adverse perinatal outcomes and to determine the impact of the timing of fetal overgrowth on neonatal outcomes. Accordingly, we investigated whether pregnancies with LGA diagnosed in the second trimester differed in terms of perinatal complications compared to those diagnosed in the third trimester.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted with pregnant women who presented to the Perinatology Department of Ankara Etlik City Hospital and gave birth to macrosomic fetuses. Patients were grouped as those who were not diagnosed with LGA antenatally and those who were diagnosed with LGA on ultrasound examination in the second and third trimesters.
Results: The pregnant women diagnosed with LGA in the second trimester had a higher mean age compared to the AGA group, and the LGA group showed the highest mean age in the third trimester (P = .010). The rate of newborns with APGAR score <7 at 1 minute was significantly higher in the second trimester LGA group compared to the AGA group (P = .029).
Conclusion: This study found that LGA cases diagnosed in the second trimester were associated with significantly higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes compared to those diagnosed in the third trimester. The findings suggest that the timing of fetal growth may be a determinant not only for birth weight but also for neonatal morbidity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound