Andreas Aust, Christoph Ahlgrim, Kaywan Izadpanah, Peter Deibert, Philipp Breitbart
{"title":"Injury epidemiology in male professional German football: a long-term comparison between the two highest national leagues.","authors":"Andreas Aust, Christoph Ahlgrim, Kaywan Izadpanah, Peter Deibert, Philipp Breitbart","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16895-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Football injuries pose substantial risks to player health, team performance, and club finances. Although injury prevention is a key priority, most epidemiological studies focus on short-term data from international tournaments or clubs outside Germany. This study aimed to examine the injury epidemiology in German elite men's football through a long-term analysis of a single club competing in both top national leagues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A professional German football team was prospectively observed over eight consecutive seasons, with four seasons played in the first division and four in the second. Injury incidence and associated time loss were analyzed using Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 357 match injuries and 625 training injuries were recorded. Injury incidence did not significantly differ between the first and second division, either for match play (79.0 vs. 80.8 injuries per 1000 match hours, P=0.83) or training (8.7 vs. 9.2 injuries per 1000 training hours, P=0.49). However, average time loss was significantly greater in the first division for both training injuries (70 vs. 49 days per 1000 training hours, P<0.01) and match injuries (653 vs. 596 days per 1000 match hours, P=0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although injury incidence was comparable between the two top German divisions, injuries sustained in the first division led to significantly greater time loss. These findings highlight the importance of addressing not only the frequency but also the severity of injuries in elite football injury prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.25.16895-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Football injuries pose substantial risks to player health, team performance, and club finances. Although injury prevention is a key priority, most epidemiological studies focus on short-term data from international tournaments or clubs outside Germany. This study aimed to examine the injury epidemiology in German elite men's football through a long-term analysis of a single club competing in both top national leagues.
Methods: A professional German football team was prospectively observed over eight consecutive seasons, with four seasons played in the first division and four in the second. Injury incidence and associated time loss were analyzed using Poisson regression.
Results: A total of 357 match injuries and 625 training injuries were recorded. Injury incidence did not significantly differ between the first and second division, either for match play (79.0 vs. 80.8 injuries per 1000 match hours, P=0.83) or training (8.7 vs. 9.2 injuries per 1000 training hours, P=0.49). However, average time loss was significantly greater in the first division for both training injuries (70 vs. 49 days per 1000 training hours, P<0.01) and match injuries (653 vs. 596 days per 1000 match hours, P=0.017).
Conclusions: Although injury incidence was comparable between the two top German divisions, injuries sustained in the first division led to significantly greater time loss. These findings highlight the importance of addressing not only the frequency but also the severity of injuries in elite football injury prevention strategies.
背景:足球伤病给球员健康、球队表现和俱乐部财政带来了巨大的风险。尽管伤害预防是重中之重,但大多数流行病学研究关注的是来自德国以外的国际锦标赛或俱乐部的短期数据。本研究旨在通过对参加两个顶级国家联赛的单个俱乐部的长期分析,研究德国精英男子足球的伤病流行病学。方法:对一支德国职业足球队进行连续8个赛季的前瞻性观察,其中4个赛季在甲级联赛,4个赛季在乙级联赛。使用泊松回归分析损伤发生率和相关时间损失。结果:共记录比赛损伤357例,训练损伤625例。无论是比赛(79.0 vs. 80.8 / 1000比赛小时,P=0.83)还是训练(8.7 vs. 9.2 / 1000训练小时,P=0.49),一级和二级联赛的受伤发生率均无显著差异。然而,在第一级联赛中,两种训练损伤的平均时间损失明显更大(70天和49天/ 1000训练小时)。结论:尽管德国两个顶级联赛的损伤发生率相当,但第一级联赛的损伤导致的时间损失明显更大。这些发现强调了在精英足球损伤预防策略中,不仅要解决损伤的频率,还要解决损伤的严重程度。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.