Markers of Suicide Risk on the MMPI-3 Among Post-9/11 Veterans.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Alec H Rothman, Jaime L Anderson, Dustin B Wygant
{"title":"Markers of Suicide Risk on the MMPI-3 Among Post-9/11 Veterans.","authors":"Alec H Rothman, Jaime L Anderson, Dustin B Wygant","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2531179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide among post-9/11 U.S. military veterans has increased dramatically, with effective identification of veteran suicide risk remaining a national priority. We investigated the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in assessing suicide risk within this population. Participants were 189 post-9/11 veterans, predominantly male (75.1%) and White/Caucasian (77.8%), who completed the MMPI-3 and self-report measures of suicidality. In this cross-sectional study, we compared MMPI-3 profiles of veterans reporting a lifetime history of suicidal ideation only or suicide attempts to those who did not, with a focus on the Suicidal/Death Ideation (SUI) scale and markers of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. One-way ANOVAs revealed large effect sizes for SUI in differentiating veterans who reported no suicidal ideation from those with suicide attempts (<i>d</i> = 3.33) and those with suicidal ideation only (<i>d</i> = 1.81), as well as veterans who reported suicidal ideation only from those who also reported past suicide attempts (<i>d</i> = .88). With a few exceptions, markers of internalizing (e.g., Demoralization [RCd]) significantly differentiated the no suicidal ideation group from the suicidal ideation only (<i>d</i>s = .52-1.12) and suicide attempt groups (<i>d</i>s = .48-1.59), while markers of externalizing (e.g., DISC) differentiated the suicidal ideation only and suicide attempt groups (<i>d</i>s = .50-.60). Analyses also revealed very large correlations between SUI and the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) Suicidality scale (<i>r</i> = .74), and Self-Harm Inventory (<i>r</i> = .51). The SUI scale incremented the RC scales and other SP scales in predicting IDAS-II Suicidality scores (11%-16% additional variance) and SHI scores (2%-4% additional variance). These findings underscore the clinical utility of the MMPI-3, particularly the SUI scale, in comprehensive suicide risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2531179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide among post-9/11 U.S. military veterans has increased dramatically, with effective identification of veteran suicide risk remaining a national priority. We investigated the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) in assessing suicide risk within this population. Participants were 189 post-9/11 veterans, predominantly male (75.1%) and White/Caucasian (77.8%), who completed the MMPI-3 and self-report measures of suicidality. In this cross-sectional study, we compared MMPI-3 profiles of veterans reporting a lifetime history of suicidal ideation only or suicide attempts to those who did not, with a focus on the Suicidal/Death Ideation (SUI) scale and markers of internalizing and externalizing psychopathology. One-way ANOVAs revealed large effect sizes for SUI in differentiating veterans who reported no suicidal ideation from those with suicide attempts (d = 3.33) and those with suicidal ideation only (d = 1.81), as well as veterans who reported suicidal ideation only from those who also reported past suicide attempts (d = .88). With a few exceptions, markers of internalizing (e.g., Demoralization [RCd]) significantly differentiated the no suicidal ideation group from the suicidal ideation only (ds = .52-1.12) and suicide attempt groups (ds = .48-1.59), while markers of externalizing (e.g., DISC) differentiated the suicidal ideation only and suicide attempt groups (ds = .50-.60). Analyses also revealed very large correlations between SUI and the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms-II (IDAS-II) Suicidality scale (r = .74), and Self-Harm Inventory (r = .51). The SUI scale incremented the RC scales and other SP scales in predicting IDAS-II Suicidality scores (11%-16% additional variance) and SHI scores (2%-4% additional variance). These findings underscore the clinical utility of the MMPI-3, particularly the SUI scale, in comprehensive suicide risk assessments.

9/11后退伍军人MMPI-3的自杀风险标记
9/11后美国的自杀率退伍军人急剧增加,有效识别退伍军人自杀风险仍然是国家的优先事项。我们调查了明尼苏达多相人格量表-3 (MMPI-3)在评估该人群自杀风险中的效用。参与者为189名9/11后退伍军人,主要为男性(75.1%)和白人/高加索人(77.8%),他们完成了MMPI-3和自杀自我报告测量。在这项横断面研究中,我们比较了报告一生中只有自杀意念或有自杀企图的退伍军人的MMPI-3谱,重点关注自杀/死亡意念(SUI)量表和内化和外化精神病理学标记。单因素方差分析显示,SUI在区分无自杀意念的退伍军人与有自杀企图的退伍军人(d = 3.33)、有自杀意念的退伍军人(d = 1.81)以及有自杀意念的退伍军人与有自杀企图的退伍军人(d = 0.88)方面具有很大的效应值。除少数例外,内化标记(如士气消沉[RCd])显著区分无自杀意念组、有自杀意念组(ds = 0.52 -1.12)和有自杀企图组(ds = 0.48 -1.59),而外化标记(如DISC)显著区分有自杀意念组和有自杀企图组(ds = 0.50 - 0.60)。分析还显示SUI与抑郁和焦虑症状量表- ii (IDAS-II)自杀量表(r = 0.74)和自残量表(r = 0.51)之间存在非常大的相关性。SUI量表增加了RC量表和其他SP量表在预测IDAS-II自杀倾向得分(11%-16%的额外方差)和SHI得分(2%-4%的额外方差)方面的作用。这些发现强调了MMPI-3,特别是SUI量表在综合自杀风险评估中的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信