{"title":"Effect of Bruxism on the Clinical Success of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study.","authors":"Fatma Yilmaz, Ozgul Carti Dorterler","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effect of bruxism on the success of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, case-control study included 40 case patients (bruxists with PCR post-ETT) and 40 controls (non-bruxists). A matching case-control model was used based on sex, age, follow-up period, cavity classification, and caries risk group. Potential risk factors affecting restoration success, such as sociodemographic characteristics and clinical findings, were recorded. The PCRs were evaluated according to revised FDI criteria. Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression analysis were used for statistical evaluation (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering caries at restoration margins (p = 0.007), color match (p = 0.039), dental hard tissue defects at restoration margins (p = 0.001), occlusion and wear (p = 0.001), and surface luster and texture (p = 0.035), bruxists achieved significantly lower success than non-bruxists. Cases had lower overall success than controls (p = 0.001). Bruxism (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.00-1.58), periodontal status (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-1.15), TMJ disorders (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-1.15), and presence of enamel cracks (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.00-1.68) significantly affected restoration success (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bruxism significantly affects functional, esthetic, and biological success of PCRs in ETT. In bruxists, PCRs in small/medium-sized cavities failed primarily because of wear, followed by color mismatching, roughness, caries, and dental hard tissue fractures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06881355.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To determine the effect of bruxism on the success of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).
Methods: This cross-sectional, case-control study included 40 case patients (bruxists with PCR post-ETT) and 40 controls (non-bruxists). A matching case-control model was used based on sex, age, follow-up period, cavity classification, and caries risk group. Potential risk factors affecting restoration success, such as sociodemographic characteristics and clinical findings, were recorded. The PCRs were evaluated according to revised FDI criteria. Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression analysis were used for statistical evaluation (p < 0.05).
Results: Considering caries at restoration margins (p = 0.007), color match (p = 0.039), dental hard tissue defects at restoration margins (p = 0.001), occlusion and wear (p = 0.001), and surface luster and texture (p = 0.035), bruxists achieved significantly lower success than non-bruxists. Cases had lower overall success than controls (p = 0.001). Bruxism (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.00-1.58), periodontal status (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-1.15), TMJ disorders (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-1.15), and presence of enamel cracks (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.00-1.68) significantly affected restoration success (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Bruxism significantly affects functional, esthetic, and biological success of PCRs in ETT. In bruxists, PCRs in small/medium-sized cavities failed primarily because of wear, followed by color mismatching, roughness, caries, and dental hard tissue fractures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics