Effect of Bruxism on the Clinical Success of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Fatma Yilmaz, Ozgul Carti Dorterler
{"title":"Effect of Bruxism on the Clinical Success of Posterior Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study.","authors":"Fatma Yilmaz, Ozgul Carti Dorterler","doi":"10.1111/jerd.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the effect of bruxism on the success of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional, case-control study included 40 case patients (bruxists with PCR post-ETT) and 40 controls (non-bruxists). A matching case-control model was used based on sex, age, follow-up period, cavity classification, and caries risk group. Potential risk factors affecting restoration success, such as sociodemographic characteristics and clinical findings, were recorded. The PCRs were evaluated according to revised FDI criteria. Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression analysis were used for statistical evaluation (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considering caries at restoration margins (p = 0.007), color match (p = 0.039), dental hard tissue defects at restoration margins (p = 0.001), occlusion and wear (p = 0.001), and surface luster and texture (p = 0.035), bruxists achieved significantly lower success than non-bruxists. Cases had lower overall success than controls (p = 0.001). Bruxism (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.00-1.58), periodontal status (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-1.15), TMJ disorders (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-1.15), and presence of enamel cracks (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.00-1.68) significantly affected restoration success (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bruxism significantly affects functional, esthetic, and biological success of PCRs in ETT. In bruxists, PCRs in small/medium-sized cavities failed primarily because of wear, followed by color mismatching, roughness, caries, and dental hard tissue fractures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06881355.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the effect of bruxism on the success of posterior composite restorations (PCRs) in endodontically treated teeth (ETT).

Methods: This cross-sectional, case-control study included 40 case patients (bruxists with PCR post-ETT) and 40 controls (non-bruxists). A matching case-control model was used based on sex, age, follow-up period, cavity classification, and caries risk group. Potential risk factors affecting restoration success, such as sociodemographic characteristics and clinical findings, were recorded. The PCRs were evaluated according to revised FDI criteria. Fisher's exact test and binary logistic regression analysis were used for statistical evaluation (p < 0.05).

Results: Considering caries at restoration margins (p = 0.007), color match (p = 0.039), dental hard tissue defects at restoration margins (p = 0.001), occlusion and wear (p = 0.001), and surface luster and texture (p = 0.035), bruxists achieved significantly lower success than non-bruxists. Cases had lower overall success than controls (p = 0.001). Bruxism (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.00-1.58), periodontal status (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-1.15), TMJ disorders (OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-1.15), and presence of enamel cracks (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.00-1.68) significantly affected restoration success (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Bruxism significantly affects functional, esthetic, and biological success of PCRs in ETT. In bruxists, PCRs in small/medium-sized cavities failed primarily because of wear, followed by color mismatching, roughness, caries, and dental hard tissue fractures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06881355.

磨牙症对牙髓治疗后牙复合修复临床成功的影响:一项横断面病例对照研究。
目的:探讨磨牙对牙髓治疗后牙体复合修复成功的影响。方法:本横断面病例对照研究包括40例磨牙患者(ett术后PCR)和40例对照组(非磨牙患者)。根据性别、年龄、随访时间、龋齿分型和患龋危险人群采用匹配的病例-对照模型。记录影响修复成功的潜在危险因素,如社会人口学特征和临床表现。根据修订后的外国直接投资标准对这些国别报告进行了评价。结果:考虑修复体边缘龋(p = 0.007)、颜色匹配(p = 0.039)、修复体边缘牙硬组织缺损(p = 0.001)、咬合和磨损(p = 0.001)、表面光泽和质地(p = 0.035),磨牙患者的成功率明显低于非磨牙患者。病例的总体成功率低于对照组(p = 0.001)。磨牙症(OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.00-1.58)、牙周状况(OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-1.15)、颞下颌关节紊乱(OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.00-1.15)和牙釉质裂纹的存在(OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.00-1.68)显著影响ETT中pcr修复的功能、美学和生物学成功。在磨牙中,pcr在小/中型蛀牙中失败的主要原因是磨损,其次是颜色不匹配、粗糙、龋齿和牙硬组织断裂。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06881355。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信