Prevalence and pattern of cognitive dysfunction in young adults and middle-aged patients with type-2 diabetes.

IF 1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Subhankar Chatterjee, Rana Bhattacharjee, Anirban Sinha, Animesh Maiti, Anustup Mukherjee, Ritwik Ghosh, Souvik Dubey
{"title":"Prevalence and pattern of cognitive dysfunction in young adults and middle-aged patients with type-2 diabetes.","authors":"Subhankar Chatterjee, Rana Bhattacharjee, Anirban Sinha, Animesh Maiti, Anustup Mukherjee, Ritwik Ghosh, Souvik Dubey","doi":"10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1900_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>With the world's aging population, twin epidemics of type-2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia take a great toll on the healthcare burden. T2D carries a 2-3 times greater risk of developing cognitive impairment than controls. Early identification of cognitive impairment is important as it impairs diabetes self-management, making patients prone to complications. However, data about the assessment of cognitive impairment in T2D using a comprehensive cognitive battery is sparse in India. This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence and pattern of cognitive impairment among young and middle-aged patients with T2D.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kolkata (2022-2024) among 125 Bengali-speaking T2D patients with formal education > class IV, aged between 20 and 60 years. The cognitive evaluation was done using the clinical dementia rating scale, mini-mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), and Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE)-III. Statistical analyses were done by Jeffrey's Amazing Statistics Program version 0.19 with appropriate tests (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation statistics, and logistic regression). <i>P</i> value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>T2D patients reported a more subjective sensation of forgetfulness compared to the control group (<i>P</i> = 0.001). MMSE was an insufficient screening tool to distinguish between these two groups. On MoCA and ACE-III, there was a significant difference in total scores between case and control groups (MoCA, <i>P</i> = 0.012 and ACE-III, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Based on ACE-III, 59.20% of T2D patients had cognitive impairment (<i>P</i> < 0.001). The odds of having cognitive impairment in T2D were 3.72 times higher than in the control group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was significant impairment of memory (<i>P</i> < 0.001), fluency (<i>P</i> = 0.020), and visuospatial ability (<i>P</i> = 0.032). Females (<i>P</i> = 0.010), less education (<i>P</i> < 0.001), lower socioeconomic status (<i>P</i> < 0.001), BMI < 23 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (<i>P</i> = 0.049), peripheral neuropathy (<i>P</i> = 0.001), hypothyroidism (<i>P</i> = 0.007), anxiety (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and depression (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were significantly associated with cognitive impairment in diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first study from Eastern India to use a comprehensive cognitive scale validated in the local vernacular. Cognitive impairment is prevalent among a significant portion of middle-aged, educated individuals with T2D. Cognitive evaluation should be incorporated into diabetes management from the onset, with a focus on addressing modifiable factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":15856,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"14 6","pages":"2527-2537"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12296403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1900_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: With the world's aging population, twin epidemics of type-2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia take a great toll on the healthcare burden. T2D carries a 2-3 times greater risk of developing cognitive impairment than controls. Early identification of cognitive impairment is important as it impairs diabetes self-management, making patients prone to complications. However, data about the assessment of cognitive impairment in T2D using a comprehensive cognitive battery is sparse in India. This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence and pattern of cognitive impairment among young and middle-aged patients with T2D.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kolkata (2022-2024) among 125 Bengali-speaking T2D patients with formal education > class IV, aged between 20 and 60 years. The cognitive evaluation was done using the clinical dementia rating scale, mini-mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), and Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE)-III. Statistical analyses were done by Jeffrey's Amazing Statistics Program version 0.19 with appropriate tests (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation statistics, and logistic regression). P value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: T2D patients reported a more subjective sensation of forgetfulness compared to the control group (P = 0.001). MMSE was an insufficient screening tool to distinguish between these two groups. On MoCA and ACE-III, there was a significant difference in total scores between case and control groups (MoCA, P = 0.012 and ACE-III, P < 0.001). Based on ACE-III, 59.20% of T2D patients had cognitive impairment (P < 0.001). The odds of having cognitive impairment in T2D were 3.72 times higher than in the control group (P < 0.001). There was significant impairment of memory (P < 0.001), fluency (P = 0.020), and visuospatial ability (P = 0.032). Females (P = 0.010), less education (P < 0.001), lower socioeconomic status (P < 0.001), BMI < 23 kg/m2 (P = 0.049), peripheral neuropathy (P = 0.001), hypothyroidism (P = 0.007), anxiety (P < 0.001), and depression (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with cognitive impairment in diabetes.

Conclusion: This is the first study from Eastern India to use a comprehensive cognitive scale validated in the local vernacular. Cognitive impairment is prevalent among a significant portion of middle-aged, educated individuals with T2D. Cognitive evaluation should be incorporated into diabetes management from the onset, with a focus on addressing modifiable factors.

青壮年和中年2型糖尿病患者认知功能障碍的患病率和模式
背景和目的:随着世界人口老龄化,2型糖尿病(T2D)和痴呆症的双重流行给医疗负担带来了巨大的代价。T2D患者发生认知障碍的风险是对照组的2-3倍。早期识别认知障碍很重要,因为它会损害糖尿病患者的自我管理,使患者容易出现并发症。然而,在印度,使用综合认知电池评估T2D认知障碍的数据很少。本研究旨在评估中青年T2D患者认知障碍的患病率和模式。材料和方法:在加尔各答的一家三级护理教学医院(2022-2024)对125名受过正规教育b> IV级的孟加拉语T2D患者进行了横断面观察研究,年龄在20至60岁之间。认知评估采用临床痴呆评定量表、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和阿登布鲁克认知检查(ACE)-III进行。统计分析采用Jeffrey's Amazing Statistics Program 0.19版本进行,并进行适当的检验(卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Spearman相关统计和逻辑回归)。P值< 0.05被认为是显著的。结果:与对照组相比,T2D患者报告了更多的主观遗忘感(P = 0.001)。MMSE不足以作为一种筛查工具来区分这两组。在MoCA和ACE-III方面,病例组与对照组的总分差异有统计学意义(MoCA, P = 0.012, ACE-III, P < 0.001)。基于ACE-III, 59.20%的T2D患者存在认知功能障碍(P < 0.001)。T2D患者发生认知障碍的几率是对照组的3.72倍(P < 0.001)。记忆力(P < 0.001)、流畅性(P = 0.020)和视觉空间能力(P = 0.032)均有显著损害。女性(P = 0.010)、受教育程度低(P < 0.001)、社会经济地位低(P < 0.001)、BMI < 23 kg/m2 (P = 0.049)、周围神经病变(P = 0.001)、甲状腺功能减退(P = 0.007)、焦虑(P < 0.001)和抑郁(P < 0.001)与糖尿病患者认知功能障碍显著相关。结论:这是东印度首次使用当地方言验证的综合认知量表的研究。认知障碍在相当一部分受过教育的中年T2D患者中普遍存在。认知评估应该从发病开始就纳入糖尿病管理,重点是解决可改变的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
7.10%
发文量
884
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信