Paradoxical interaction between dalbavancin and β-lactams against endocarditis-associated Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
David Luque Paz, Adrien Turban, François Guérin, Malo Penven, Matthieu Revest, Cristina García-de-la-Mària, José M Miró, Pierre Tattevin, Vincent Cattoir
{"title":"Paradoxical interaction between dalbavancin and β-lactams against endocarditis-associated Enterococcus faecalis clinical isolates.","authors":"David Luque Paz, Adrien Turban, François Guérin, Malo Penven, Matthieu Revest, Cristina García-de-la-Mària, José M Miró, Pierre Tattevin, Vincent Cattoir","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are limited in vitro synergistic studies on dalbavancin against enterococci. We aimed to assess the in vitro activity of dalbavancin against Enterococcus faecalis strains, and to explore the interaction between dalbavancin and β-lactams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MIC and MBC values were determined against a panel of 10 clinical isolates and two reference strains of E. faecalis. Checkerboard assays were conducted for the initial screening for additive, synergistic or antagonistic effect between dalbavancin and different classes of antibiotics. Thereafter, time-kill (TK) assays with β-lactams were performed to confirm the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All strains were tolerant to dalbavancin (MBC/MIC ratios >32). For 11 of the 12 strains tested, a synergy was found in TK assays between dalbavancin (0.5 × MIC) and each β-lactam (0.25 × MIC), namely amoxicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftobiprole, ertapenem and meropenem. Paradoxically, we systematically found reduced efficacy of β-lactams in combination with dalbavancin at concentrations greater than or equal to MIC. At these concentrations, TK assays demonstrated that a combination with dalbavancin resulted in an antagonism of amoxicillin (8/12 strains), ceftobiprole (10/12 strains) and ertapenem (5/12 strains) activities. Dalbavancin alone at 32 mg/L or in combination with amoxicillin at 2 mg/L induced a slow bacterial reduction (median decrease of 0.4 log10 at 24 h for both regimens), whereas amoxicillin alone at 2 mg/L reduced the E. faecalis inoculum by 3.2 log10 (IQR, 3.1-3.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dalbavancin exhibits poor activity against E. faecalis, and impairs the activity of β-lactams, especially amoxicillin. Dalbavancin should be used with caution in the treatment of E. faecalis infective endocarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"2524-2529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are limited in vitro synergistic studies on dalbavancin against enterococci. We aimed to assess the in vitro activity of dalbavancin against Enterococcus faecalis strains, and to explore the interaction between dalbavancin and β-lactams.

Methods: MIC and MBC values were determined against a panel of 10 clinical isolates and two reference strains of E. faecalis. Checkerboard assays were conducted for the initial screening for additive, synergistic or antagonistic effect between dalbavancin and different classes of antibiotics. Thereafter, time-kill (TK) assays with β-lactams were performed to confirm the results.

Results: All strains were tolerant to dalbavancin (MBC/MIC ratios >32). For 11 of the 12 strains tested, a synergy was found in TK assays between dalbavancin (0.5 × MIC) and each β-lactam (0.25 × MIC), namely amoxicillin, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefepime, ceftobiprole, ertapenem and meropenem. Paradoxically, we systematically found reduced efficacy of β-lactams in combination with dalbavancin at concentrations greater than or equal to MIC. At these concentrations, TK assays demonstrated that a combination with dalbavancin resulted in an antagonism of amoxicillin (8/12 strains), ceftobiprole (10/12 strains) and ertapenem (5/12 strains) activities. Dalbavancin alone at 32 mg/L or in combination with amoxicillin at 2 mg/L induced a slow bacterial reduction (median decrease of 0.4 log10 at 24 h for both regimens), whereas amoxicillin alone at 2 mg/L reduced the E. faecalis inoculum by 3.2 log10 (IQR, 3.1-3.4).

Conclusions: Dalbavancin exhibits poor activity against E. faecalis, and impairs the activity of β-lactams, especially amoxicillin. Dalbavancin should be used with caution in the treatment of E. faecalis infective endocarditis.

dalbavancin和β-内酰胺对抗心内膜炎相关粪肠球菌临床分离株的矛盾相互作用。
背景:黄芩苷抗肠球菌的体外增效研究有限。本实验旨在评价达尔巴万素体外抗粪肠球菌的活性,并探讨达尔巴万素与β-内酰胺的相互作用。方法:对10株临床分离株和2株参考菌株进行MIC和MBC测定。采用棋盘法初步筛选达巴文星与不同种类抗生素的加性、增效或拮抗作用。然后,用β-内酰胺进行时间杀伤(TK)试验来证实结果。结果:所有菌株对达尔巴万辛均有耐受性(MBC/MIC比bb0.32)。在12株菌株中,有11株达巴文星(0.5 × MIC)与阿莫西林、头孢唑林、头孢曲松、头孢吡肟、头孢双prole、厄他培南、美罗培南等β-内酰胺(0.25 × MIC)具有协同作用。矛盾的是,我们系统地发现β-内酰胺与达巴文星在浓度大于或等于MIC时的疗效降低。在这些浓度下,TK试验表明,与达巴文星联用可拮抗阿莫西林(8/12株)、头孢双prole(10/12株)和埃他培南(5/12株)的活性。单独使用32 mg/L的达尔巴万辛或联合使用2 mg/L的阿莫西林诱导细菌缓慢减少(两种方案在24小时内平均减少0.4 log10),而单独使用2 mg/L的阿莫西林使粪肠球菌接种量减少3.2 log10 (IQR, 3.1-3.4)。结论:Dalbavancin对粪肠球菌的活性较差,并损害β-内酰胺类,尤其是阿莫西林的活性。在治疗粪肠杆菌感染性心内膜炎时应谨慎使用达巴文星。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信