The Value of Using Bedside Point of Care Testing for International Normalized Ratio in Patients on Warfarin Undergoing Dental Procedures and Bleeding Assessment; A Single Center Prospective Study.

IF 2.7 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Journal of Blood Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JBM.S514109
Abdullah Albarkheel, Hawazen Alshareef, Amal Albar, Sohayla Youssef Altbaili, Mohammed Ali Alminaqash, Amjad Alotibie, Aamir Sheikh, Abdullah Alahmadi, Badar Alaifan, Hani Tamim, Tarek Owaidah
{"title":"The Value of Using Bedside Point of Care Testing for International Normalized Ratio in Patients on Warfarin Undergoing Dental Procedures and Bleeding Assessment; A Single Center Prospective Study.","authors":"Abdullah Albarkheel, Hawazen Alshareef, Amal Albar, Sohayla Youssef Altbaili, Mohammed Ali Alminaqash, Amjad Alotibie, Aamir Sheikh, Abdullah Alahmadi, Badar Alaifan, Hani Tamim, Tarek Owaidah","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S514109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication in dental surgeries, especially for patients on anticoagulants. Risk stratification based on patient factors can help reduce these complications, but current tools lack accurate risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine point-of-care device accuracy for measuring International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to laboratory INR and evaluate risk factors for post-dental surgical bleeding in warfarin patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding following invasive dental procedures. INR measurements were performed using both point-of-care devices and laboratory methods. One-way ANOVA compared INR values across bleeding severity groups and procedure types. Independent samples <i>t</i>-test compared INR values between low (<5 mg) versus high (≥5 mg) warfarin doses. Levene's test assessed variance equality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 88 patients (61.4% female, mean age 49.7 ± 14.1 years). Bleeding outcomes were: no bleeding (33.0%, n = 29), minimal bleeding (34.1%, n = 30), moderate bleeding (20.5%, n = 18), and severe bleeding (11.4%, n = 10). No significant differences existed between <5 mg versus ≥5 mg warfarin groups in point-of-care INR (2.51 vs 2.70, p = 0.235) or laboratory INR (2.54 vs 2.63, p = 0.572). Significant associations were found between physician and procedure type (p < 0.001) and between point-of-care and laboratory INR measurements (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). No correlation existed between INR level and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bleeding risk in warfarin patients undergoing dental procedures depends on procedure complexity and duration rather than INR level alone. Point-of-care INR devices demonstrated accuracy comparable to laboratory measurements, offering valuable risk assessment that may help predict bleeding risk and provide reassurance for low-risk cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"337-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S514109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication in dental surgeries, especially for patients on anticoagulants. Risk stratification based on patient factors can help reduce these complications, but current tools lack accurate risk prediction.

Aim: To examine point-of-care device accuracy for measuring International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to laboratory INR and evaluate risk factors for post-dental surgical bleeding in warfarin patients.

Methods: The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding following invasive dental procedures. INR measurements were performed using both point-of-care devices and laboratory methods. One-way ANOVA compared INR values across bleeding severity groups and procedure types. Independent samples t-test compared INR values between low (<5 mg) versus high (≥5 mg) warfarin doses. Levene's test assessed variance equality.

Results: The study included 88 patients (61.4% female, mean age 49.7 ± 14.1 years). Bleeding outcomes were: no bleeding (33.0%, n = 29), minimal bleeding (34.1%, n = 30), moderate bleeding (20.5%, n = 18), and severe bleeding (11.4%, n = 10). No significant differences existed between <5 mg versus ≥5 mg warfarin groups in point-of-care INR (2.51 vs 2.70, p = 0.235) or laboratory INR (2.54 vs 2.63, p = 0.572). Significant associations were found between physician and procedure type (p < 0.001) and between point-of-care and laboratory INR measurements (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). No correlation existed between INR level and bleeding.

Conclusion: Bleeding risk in warfarin patients undergoing dental procedures depends on procedure complexity and duration rather than INR level alone. Point-of-care INR devices demonstrated accuracy comparable to laboratory measurements, offering valuable risk assessment that may help predict bleeding risk and provide reassurance for low-risk cases.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

床边护理点国际标准化比值测试在华法林牙科治疗及出血评估中的应用价值单中心前瞻性研究。
术后出血是牙科手术的一个重要并发症,特别是对使用抗凝剂的患者。基于患者因素的风险分层可以帮助减少这些并发症,但目前的工具缺乏准确的风险预测。目的:比较点护理设备测量国际标准化比率(INR)与实验室INR的准确性,并评估华法林患者术后出血的危险因素。方法:主要结局是侵入性牙科手术后出血。INR测量使用即时护理装置和实验室方法进行。单因素方差分析比较出血严重程度组和手术类型的INR值。结果:本研究纳入88例患者(女性61.4%,平均年龄49.7±14.1岁)。出血结局为:无出血(33.0%,n = 29),轻度出血(34.1%,n = 30),中度出血(20.5%,n = 18),重度出血(11.4%,n = 10)。结论:华法林患者接受牙科手术的出血风险与手术复杂性和持续时间有关,而不仅仅是INR水平。即时护理INR设备显示出与实验室测量相当的准确性,提供有价值的风险评估,可能有助于预测出血风险,并为低风险病例提供保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信