The Value of Using Bedside Point of Care Testing for International Normalized Ratio in Patients on Warfarin Undergoing Dental Procedures and Bleeding Assessment; A Single Center Prospective Study.
Abdullah Albarkheel, Hawazen Alshareef, Amal Albar, Sohayla Youssef Altbaili, Mohammed Ali Alminaqash, Amjad Alotibie, Aamir Sheikh, Abdullah Alahmadi, Badar Alaifan, Hani Tamim, Tarek Owaidah
{"title":"The Value of Using Bedside Point of Care Testing for International Normalized Ratio in Patients on Warfarin Undergoing Dental Procedures and Bleeding Assessment; A Single Center Prospective Study.","authors":"Abdullah Albarkheel, Hawazen Alshareef, Amal Albar, Sohayla Youssef Altbaili, Mohammed Ali Alminaqash, Amjad Alotibie, Aamir Sheikh, Abdullah Alahmadi, Badar Alaifan, Hani Tamim, Tarek Owaidah","doi":"10.2147/JBM.S514109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication in dental surgeries, especially for patients on anticoagulants. Risk stratification based on patient factors can help reduce these complications, but current tools lack accurate risk prediction.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine point-of-care device accuracy for measuring International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to laboratory INR and evaluate risk factors for post-dental surgical bleeding in warfarin patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding following invasive dental procedures. INR measurements were performed using both point-of-care devices and laboratory methods. One-way ANOVA compared INR values across bleeding severity groups and procedure types. Independent samples <i>t</i>-test compared INR values between low (<5 mg) versus high (≥5 mg) warfarin doses. Levene's test assessed variance equality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 88 patients (61.4% female, mean age 49.7 ± 14.1 years). Bleeding outcomes were: no bleeding (33.0%, n = 29), minimal bleeding (34.1%, n = 30), moderate bleeding (20.5%, n = 18), and severe bleeding (11.4%, n = 10). No significant differences existed between <5 mg versus ≥5 mg warfarin groups in point-of-care INR (2.51 vs 2.70, p = 0.235) or laboratory INR (2.54 vs 2.63, p = 0.572). Significant associations were found between physician and procedure type (p < 0.001) and between point-of-care and laboratory INR measurements (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). No correlation existed between INR level and bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bleeding risk in warfarin patients undergoing dental procedures depends on procedure complexity and duration rather than INR level alone. Point-of-care INR devices demonstrated accuracy comparable to laboratory measurements, offering valuable risk assessment that may help predict bleeding risk and provide reassurance for low-risk cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Blood Medicine","volume":"16 ","pages":"337-348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12301139/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Blood Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S514109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative bleeding is a significant complication in dental surgeries, especially for patients on anticoagulants. Risk stratification based on patient factors can help reduce these complications, but current tools lack accurate risk prediction.
Aim: To examine point-of-care device accuracy for measuring International Normalized Ratio (INR) compared to laboratory INR and evaluate risk factors for post-dental surgical bleeding in warfarin patients.
Methods: The primary outcome was post-operative bleeding following invasive dental procedures. INR measurements were performed using both point-of-care devices and laboratory methods. One-way ANOVA compared INR values across bleeding severity groups and procedure types. Independent samples t-test compared INR values between low (<5 mg) versus high (≥5 mg) warfarin doses. Levene's test assessed variance equality.
Results: The study included 88 patients (61.4% female, mean age 49.7 ± 14.1 years). Bleeding outcomes were: no bleeding (33.0%, n = 29), minimal bleeding (34.1%, n = 30), moderate bleeding (20.5%, n = 18), and severe bleeding (11.4%, n = 10). No significant differences existed between <5 mg versus ≥5 mg warfarin groups in point-of-care INR (2.51 vs 2.70, p = 0.235) or laboratory INR (2.54 vs 2.63, p = 0.572). Significant associations were found between physician and procedure type (p < 0.001) and between point-of-care and laboratory INR measurements (r = 0.717, p < 0.001). No correlation existed between INR level and bleeding.
Conclusion: Bleeding risk in warfarin patients undergoing dental procedures depends on procedure complexity and duration rather than INR level alone. Point-of-care INR devices demonstrated accuracy comparable to laboratory measurements, offering valuable risk assessment that may help predict bleeding risk and provide reassurance for low-risk cases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Blood Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal publishing laboratory, experimental and clinical aspects of all topics pertaining to blood based medicine including but not limited to: Transfusion Medicine (blood components, stem cell transplantation, apheresis, gene based therapeutics), Blood collection, Donor issues, Transmittable diseases, and Blood banking logistics, Immunohematology, Artificial and alternative blood based therapeutics, Hematology including disorders/pathology related to leukocytes/immunology, red cells, platelets and hemostasis, Biotechnology/nanotechnology of blood related medicine, Legal aspects of blood medicine, Historical perspectives. Original research, short reports, reviews, case reports and commentaries are invited.