Treatment effectiveness for comorbid anorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Madison Massmann, Kirsten Gilbert
{"title":"Treatment effectiveness for comorbid anorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a systematic review.","authors":"Molly Fennig Steinhoff, Madison Massmann, Kirsten Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2537660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Anorexia nervosa (AN) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are severe, commonly co-occurring disorders. AN and OCD comorbidity is associated with worsened prognosis and treatment responses, so better understanding treatment efficacy across both disorders could improve outcomes. We conducted the first known systematic review of non-pharmacological treatment efficacy for comorbid AN and OCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of PubMed, PsycNet, Scopus, ProQuest and Google Scholar, up to and including January 2024, yielded 14 studies. PRISMA methodology was used. The study was preregistered (PROSPERO CRD42024507762).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AN symptoms tended to improve while OCD symptoms did not. Most studies looked at treatments developed for AN. Studies examined a range of treatment types (e.g., deep brain stimulation and family-based therapy), study types (e.g., case study, single-arm and randomised controlled trial) and spanned all levels of care. Participants were mostly patients with AN, and many also had OCD symptoms. Risk-of-bias was variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current treatments may be effective for AN but not for comorbid OCD symptoms. More research is needed examining comorbid AN and OCD treatment, particularly with more severe OCD. Future efforts should investigate transdiagnostic treatments, utilisation of OCD treatments for AN and longitudinal designs to examine relapse in addition to remission.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"97-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2537660","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are severe, commonly co-occurring disorders. AN and OCD comorbidity is associated with worsened prognosis and treatment responses, so better understanding treatment efficacy across both disorders could improve outcomes. We conducted the first known systematic review of non-pharmacological treatment efficacy for comorbid AN and OCD.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, PsycNet, Scopus, ProQuest and Google Scholar, up to and including January 2024, yielded 14 studies. PRISMA methodology was used. The study was preregistered (PROSPERO CRD42024507762).

Results: AN symptoms tended to improve while OCD symptoms did not. Most studies looked at treatments developed for AN. Studies examined a range of treatment types (e.g., deep brain stimulation and family-based therapy), study types (e.g., case study, single-arm and randomised controlled trial) and spanned all levels of care. Participants were mostly patients with AN, and many also had OCD symptoms. Risk-of-bias was variable.

Conclusion: Current treatments may be effective for AN but not for comorbid OCD symptoms. More research is needed examining comorbid AN and OCD treatment, particularly with more severe OCD. Future efforts should investigate transdiagnostic treatments, utilisation of OCD treatments for AN and longitudinal designs to examine relapse in addition to remission.

神经性厌食症合并强迫症的治疗效果:系统综述。
目的:神经性厌食症(Anorexia neurosa, AN)与强迫症(obsessive compulsive disorder, OCD)是两种严重且常见的共发性疾病。AN和OCD合并症与预后和治疗反应恶化有关,因此更好地了解两种疾病的治疗效果可以改善结果。我们对AN和OCD共病的非药物治疗效果进行了首次系统评价。方法:系统回顾PubMed、PsycNet、Scopus、ProQuest和谷歌Scholar,截至2024年1月,共收录14篇研究。采用PRISMA方法学。该研究已预注册(PROSPERO CRD42024507762)。结果:AN症状有改善的趋势,而OCD症状无改善趋势。大多数研究着眼于AN的治疗方法。研究检查了一系列治疗类型(例如,深部脑刺激和家庭治疗),研究类型(例如,案例研究,单臂和随机对照试验),涵盖了所有级别的护理。参与者大多是AN患者,许多人也有强迫症症状。偏倚风险是可变的。结论:目前的治疗方法可能对AN有效,但对合并症的强迫症症状无效。需要更多的研究来检查AN和强迫症的共病治疗,特别是对更严重的强迫症。未来的努力应该研究跨诊断治疗,使用强迫症治疗AN和纵向设计来检查复发和缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信