The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on maternal mortality: evidence from global, developed and developing countries.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicholas Ngepah, Charles S Saba, Ariane Ephemia Ndzignat Mouteyica, Abieyuwa Ohonba
{"title":"The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on maternal mortality: evidence from global, developed and developing countries.","authors":"Nicholas Ngepah, Charles S Saba, Ariane Ephemia Ndzignat Mouteyica, Abieyuwa Ohonba","doi":"10.1186/s12992-025-01135-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on maternal mortality in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1, which aims to reduce maternal mortality to below 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030. Despite advancements, maternal mortality remains disproportionately high in developing countries due to weaker healthcare infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using panel data from 70 countries (1990-2022), sourced from WHO's Global Burden of Disease (GBD), World Bank's World Development Indicators (WDI), UNCTAD, and the World Robotics database, we apply the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach to assess AI's impact over time and the Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine short- and long-term effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI adoption significantly reduces maternal mortality, particularly in developing countries, where post-2000 advancements have led to notable declines. ARDL results show that 27% of deviations from long-term maternal mortality trends are corrected annually, highlighting AI's sustained impact. The DiD analysis indicates AI's greatest benefits in resource-limited settings, including improving early diagnostics, personalized care, and remote monitoring. In developed countries, AI's effects are marginal due to existing advanced healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI presents a transformative solution for reducing maternal mortality, particularly in low-resource settings. Policymakers should prioritize AI-driven healthcare, expand digital infrastructure, and ensure equitable access to maximize its benefits. AI integration is crucial for addressing maternal health disparities and accelerating progress toward SDG 3.1.</p>","PeriodicalId":12747,"journal":{"name":"Globalization and Health","volume":"21 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Globalization and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01135-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examines the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on maternal mortality in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.1, which aims to reduce maternal mortality to below 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030. Despite advancements, maternal mortality remains disproportionately high in developing countries due to weaker healthcare infrastructure.

Methods: Using panel data from 70 countries (1990-2022), sourced from WHO's Global Burden of Disease (GBD), World Bank's World Development Indicators (WDI), UNCTAD, and the World Robotics database, we apply the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach to assess AI's impact over time and the Auto-Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model to examine short- and long-term effects.

Results: AI adoption significantly reduces maternal mortality, particularly in developing countries, where post-2000 advancements have led to notable declines. ARDL results show that 27% of deviations from long-term maternal mortality trends are corrected annually, highlighting AI's sustained impact. The DiD analysis indicates AI's greatest benefits in resource-limited settings, including improving early diagnostics, personalized care, and remote monitoring. In developed countries, AI's effects are marginal due to existing advanced healthcare systems.

Conclusion: AI presents a transformative solution for reducing maternal mortality, particularly in low-resource settings. Policymakers should prioritize AI-driven healthcare, expand digital infrastructure, and ensure equitable access to maximize its benefits. AI integration is crucial for addressing maternal health disparities and accelerating progress toward SDG 3.1.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能对孕产妇死亡率的影响:来自全球、发达国家和发展中国家的证据。
背景:本研究根据可持续发展目标3.1考察了人工智能(AI)对孕产妇死亡率的影响,该目标旨在到2030年将孕产妇死亡率降至每10万活产70人以下。尽管取得了进展,但由于医疗基础设施薄弱,发展中国家的孕产妇死亡率仍然高得不成比例。方法:使用来自70个国家(1990-2022年)的面板数据,这些数据来自世卫组织的全球疾病负担(GBD)、世界银行的世界发展指标(WDI)、联合国贸易和发展会议(UNCTAD)和世界机器人数据库,我们采用差分法(DiD)来评估人工智能随时间的影响,并采用自回归分布式滞后(ARDL)模型来检查短期和长期影响。结果:人工智能的采用显著降低了孕产妇死亡率,特别是在发展中国家,2000年后的进步导致孕产妇死亡率显著下降。ARDL的结果显示,每年有27%的长期孕产妇死亡率趋势偏差得到纠正,凸显了人工智能的持续影响。DiD分析表明,人工智能在资源有限的环境中最大的好处,包括改善早期诊断、个性化护理和远程监测。在发达国家,由于现有先进的医疗体系,人工智能的影响很小。结论:人工智能提供了降低孕产妇死亡率的变革性解决方案,特别是在资源匮乏的环境中。政策制定者应优先考虑人工智能驱动的医疗保健,扩大数字基础设施,并确保公平获取,以最大限度地发挥其效益。人工智能整合对于解决孕产妇健康差距和加速实现可持续发展目标3.1至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Globalization and Health
Globalization and Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: "Globalization and Health" is a pioneering transdisciplinary journal dedicated to situating public health and well-being within the dynamic forces of global development. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research that explores the impact of globalization processes on global public health. This includes examining how globalization influences health systems and the social, economic, commercial, and political determinants of health. The journal welcomes contributions from various disciplines, including policy, health systems, political economy, international relations, and community perspectives. While single-country studies are accepted, they must emphasize global/globalization mechanisms and their relevance to global-level policy discourse and decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信